WRAP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

GoPro has a net margin of -24.48% compared to Wrap Technologies's net margin of -3.17%. Wrap Technologies's return on equity of -216.81% beat GoPro's return on equity of -116.34%.

Wrap Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 62.34%. On the other hand GoPro has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 23.85%. Given that Wrap Technologies has higher upside potential than GoPro, analysts believe Wrap Technologies is more attractive than GoPro.

Wrap Technologies has a beta of 1.476, which suggesting that the stock is 47.576% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GoPro has a beta of 1.524, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.372%.

Wrap Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GoPro offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Wrap Technologies pays -0.19% of its earnings as a dividend. GoPro pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Wrap Technologies quarterly revenues are $593K, which are smaller than GoPro quarterly revenues of $258.9M. Wrap Technologies's net income of $2M is higher than GoPro's net income of -$8.2M. Notably, Wrap Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while GoPro's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Wrap Technologies is 16.28x versus 0.19x for GoPro. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intel has a net margin of -24.48% compared to Wrap Technologies's net margin of -125.26%. Wrap Technologies's return on equity of -216.81% beat Intel's return on equity of -14.47%.

Wrap Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 62.34%. On the other hand Intel has an analysts' consensus of $24.33 which suggests that it could grow by 20.44%. Given that Wrap Technologies has higher upside potential than Intel, analysts believe Wrap Technologies is more attractive than Intel.

Wrap Technologies has a beta of 1.476, which suggesting that the stock is 47.576% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intel has a beta of 1.052, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.181%.

Wrap Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intel offers a yield of 2.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Wrap Technologies pays -0.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Intel pays out 182.83% of its earnings as a dividend.

Wrap Technologies quarterly revenues are $593K, which are smaller than Intel quarterly revenues of $13.3B. Wrap Technologies's net income of $2M is higher than Intel's net income of -$16.6B. Notably, Wrap Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Intel's PE ratio is 91.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Wrap Technologies is 16.28x versus 1.59x for Intel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lattice Semiconductor has a net margin of -24.48% compared to Wrap Technologies's net margin of 5.66%. Wrap Technologies's return on equity of -216.81% beat Lattice Semiconductor's return on equity of 21.06%.

Wrap Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 62.34%. On the other hand Lattice Semiconductor has an analysts' consensus of $76.06 which suggests that it could grow by 2.17%. Given that Wrap Technologies has higher upside potential than Lattice Semiconductor, analysts believe Wrap Technologies is more attractive than Lattice Semiconductor.

Wrap Technologies has a beta of 1.476, which suggesting that the stock is 47.576% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lattice Semiconductor has a beta of 1.415, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.537%.

Wrap Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lattice Semiconductor offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Wrap Technologies pays -0.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Lattice Semiconductor pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Wrap Technologies quarterly revenues are $593K, which are smaller than Lattice Semiconductor quarterly revenues of $127.1M. Wrap Technologies's net income of $2M is lower than Lattice Semiconductor's net income of $7.2M. Notably, Wrap Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lattice Semiconductor's PE ratio is 58.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Wrap Technologies is 16.28x versus 14.81x for Lattice Semiconductor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WidePoint has a net margin of -24.48% compared to Wrap Technologies's net margin of -1.23%. Wrap Technologies's return on equity of -216.81% beat WidePoint's return on equity of -20.12%.

Wrap Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 62.34%. On the other hand WidePoint has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 48.06%. Given that Wrap Technologies has higher upside potential than WidePoint, analysts believe Wrap Technologies is more attractive than WidePoint.

Wrap Technologies has a beta of 1.476, which suggesting that the stock is 47.576% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WidePoint has a beta of 1.716, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.645%.

Wrap Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. WidePoint offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Wrap Technologies pays -0.19% of its earnings as a dividend. WidePoint pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Wrap Technologies quarterly revenues are $593K, which are smaller than WidePoint quarterly revenues of $34.6M. Wrap Technologies's net income of $2M is higher than WidePoint's net income of -$425.2K. Notably, Wrap Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while WidePoint's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Wrap Technologies is 16.28x versus 0.30x for WidePoint. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.