WIMI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

ZW Data Action Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to WiMi Hologram Cloud, Inc.'s net margin of -6.29%. WiMi Hologram Cloud, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat ZW Data Action Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -54.79%.

WiMi Hologram Cloud, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 139.73%. On the other hand ZW Data Action Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that WiMi Hologram Cloud, Inc. has higher upside potential than ZW Data Action Technologies, Inc., analysts believe WiMi Hologram Cloud, Inc. is more attractive than ZW Data Action Technologies, Inc..

WiMi Hologram Cloud, Inc. has a beta of 0.308, which suggesting that the stock is 69.183% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ZW Data Action Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 0.675, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.488%.

WiMi Hologram Cloud, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ZW Data Action Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. WiMi Hologram Cloud, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ZW Data Action Technologies, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

WiMi Hologram Cloud, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ZW Data Action Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.7M. WiMi Hologram Cloud, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than ZW Data Action Technologies, Inc.'s net income of -$108K. Notably, WiMi Hologram Cloud, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 2.70x while ZW Data Action Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WiMi Hologram Cloud, Inc. is 1.03x versus 0.49x for ZW Data Action Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

36Kr Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to WiMi Hologram Cloud, Inc.'s net margin of --. WiMi Hologram Cloud, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat 36Kr Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -75%.

WiMi Hologram Cloud, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 139.73%. On the other hand 36Kr Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2895.21%. Given that 36Kr Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than WiMi Hologram Cloud, Inc., analysts believe 36Kr Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than WiMi Hologram Cloud, Inc..

WiMi Hologram Cloud, Inc. has a beta of 0.308, which suggesting that the stock is 69.183% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison 36Kr Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.581, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.888%.

WiMi Hologram Cloud, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. 36Kr Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. WiMi Hologram Cloud, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. 36Kr Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

WiMi Hologram Cloud, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than 36Kr Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. WiMi Hologram Cloud, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than 36Kr Holdings, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, WiMi Hologram Cloud, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 2.70x while 36Kr Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WiMi Hologram Cloud, Inc. is 1.03x versus 0.27x for 36Kr Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Token Cat Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to WiMi Hologram Cloud, Inc.'s net margin of --. WiMi Hologram Cloud, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Token Cat Ltd.'s return on equity of -350.08%.

WiMi Hologram Cloud, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 139.73%. On the other hand Token Cat Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 36257.08%. Given that Token Cat Ltd. has higher upside potential than WiMi Hologram Cloud, Inc., analysts believe Token Cat Ltd. is more attractive than WiMi Hologram Cloud, Inc..

WiMi Hologram Cloud, Inc. has a beta of 0.308, which suggesting that the stock is 69.183% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Token Cat Ltd. has a beta of 0.656, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.393%.

WiMi Hologram Cloud, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Token Cat Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. WiMi Hologram Cloud, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Token Cat Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

WiMi Hologram Cloud, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Token Cat Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. WiMi Hologram Cloud, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Token Cat Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, WiMi Hologram Cloud, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 2.70x while Token Cat Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WiMi Hologram Cloud, Inc. is 1.03x versus 0.23x for Token Cat Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.