VSEC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Conrad Industries has a net margin of -3.51% compared to VSE's net margin of --. VSE's return on equity of 1.56% beat Conrad Industries's return on equity of --.

VSE has a consensus price target of $147.58, signalling upside risk potential of 12.35%. On the other hand Conrad Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -16.32%. Given that VSE has higher upside potential than Conrad Industries, analysts believe VSE is more attractive than Conrad Industries.

VSE has a beta of 1.344, which suggesting that the stock is 34.355% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Conrad Industries has a beta of 0.382, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.843%.

VSE has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.31%. Conrad Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. VSE pays 46.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Conrad Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. VSE's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

VSE quarterly revenues are $256M, which are larger than Conrad Industries quarterly revenues of --. VSE's net income of -$9M is higher than Conrad Industries's net income of --. Notably, VSE's price-to-earnings ratio is 164.72x while Conrad Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VSE is 2.26x versus 0.30x for Conrad Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Curtiss-Wright has a net margin of -3.51% compared to VSE's net margin of 12.58%. VSE's return on equity of 1.56% beat Curtiss-Wright's return on equity of 17.42%.

VSE has a consensus price target of $147.58, signalling upside risk potential of 12.35%. On the other hand Curtiss-Wright has an analysts' consensus of $392.89 which suggests that it could grow by 2.16%. Given that VSE has higher upside potential than Curtiss-Wright, analysts believe VSE is more attractive than Curtiss-Wright.

VSE has a beta of 1.344, which suggesting that the stock is 34.355% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Curtiss-Wright has a beta of 1.035, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.51%.

VSE has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.31%. Curtiss-Wright offers a yield of 0.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. VSE pays 46.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Curtiss-Wright pays out 7.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

VSE quarterly revenues are $256M, which are smaller than Curtiss-Wright quarterly revenues of $805.6M. VSE's net income of -$9M is lower than Curtiss-Wright's net income of $101.3M. Notably, VSE's price-to-earnings ratio is 164.72x while Curtiss-Wright's PE ratio is 34.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VSE is 2.26x versus 4.58x for Curtiss-Wright. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sturm Ruger & has a net margin of -3.51% compared to VSE's net margin of 5.72%. VSE's return on equity of 1.56% beat Sturm Ruger &'s return on equity of 9.71%.

VSE has a consensus price target of $147.58, signalling upside risk potential of 12.35%. On the other hand Sturm Ruger & has an analysts' consensus of $41.00 which suggests that it could grow by 17.14%. Given that Sturm Ruger & has higher upside potential than VSE, analysts believe Sturm Ruger & is more attractive than VSE.

VSE has a beta of 1.344, which suggesting that the stock is 34.355% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sturm Ruger & has a beta of 0.199, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.071%.

VSE has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.31%. Sturm Ruger & offers a yield of 2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. VSE pays 46.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Sturm Ruger & pays out 38.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

VSE quarterly revenues are $256M, which are larger than Sturm Ruger & quarterly revenues of $135.7M. VSE's net income of -$9M is lower than Sturm Ruger &'s net income of $7.8M. Notably, VSE's price-to-earnings ratio is 164.72x while Sturm Ruger &'s PE ratio is 19.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VSE is 2.26x versus 1.12x for Sturm Ruger &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

V2X has a net margin of -3.51% compared to VSE's net margin of 0.8%. VSE's return on equity of 1.56% beat V2X's return on equity of 4.12%.

VSE has a consensus price target of $147.58, signalling upside risk potential of 12.35%. On the other hand V2X has an analysts' consensus of $63.09 which suggests that it could grow by 24.69%. Given that V2X has higher upside potential than VSE, analysts believe V2X is more attractive than VSE.

VSE has a beta of 1.344, which suggesting that the stock is 34.355% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison V2X has a beta of 0.267, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.35%.

VSE has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.31%. V2X offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. VSE pays 46.07% of its earnings as a dividend. V2X pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. VSE's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

VSE quarterly revenues are $256M, which are smaller than V2X quarterly revenues of $1B. VSE's net income of -$9M is lower than V2X's net income of $8.1M. Notably, VSE's price-to-earnings ratio is 164.72x while V2X's PE ratio is 39.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VSE is 2.26x versus 0.37x for V2X. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.