VNOM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CKX Lands, Inc. has a net margin of -50.38% compared to Viper Energy, Inc.'s net margin of 71.5%. Viper Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.85% beat CKX Lands, Inc.'s return on equity of 2.54%.

Viper Energy, Inc. has a consensus price target of $50.22, signalling upside risk potential of 10.04%. On the other hand CKX Lands, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Viper Energy, Inc. has higher upside potential than CKX Lands, Inc., analysts believe Viper Energy, Inc. is more attractive than CKX Lands, Inc..

Viper Energy, Inc. has a beta of 0.513, which suggesting that the stock is 48.73% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CKX Lands, Inc. has a beta of -0.189, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 118.904%.

Viper Energy, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.12%. CKX Lands, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Viper Energy, Inc. pays 62.86% of its earnings as a dividend. CKX Lands, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Viper Energy, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Viper Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues are $393M, which are larger than CKX Lands, Inc. quarterly revenues of $232.6K. Viper Energy, Inc.'s net income of -$198M is lower than CKX Lands, Inc.'s net income of $166.3K. Notably, Viper Energy, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.90x while CKX Lands, Inc.'s PE ratio is 51.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Viper Energy, Inc. is 5.00x versus 27.25x for CKX Lands, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Halliburton Co. has a net margin of -50.38% compared to Viper Energy, Inc.'s net margin of 10.41%. Viper Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.85% beat Halliburton Co.'s return on equity of 12.36%.

Viper Energy, Inc. has a consensus price target of $50.22, signalling upside risk potential of 10.04%. On the other hand Halliburton Co. has an analysts' consensus of $36.34 which suggests that it could grow by 3.5%. Given that Viper Energy, Inc. has higher upside potential than Halliburton Co., analysts believe Viper Energy, Inc. is more attractive than Halliburton Co..

Viper Energy, Inc. has a beta of 0.513, which suggesting that the stock is 48.73% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Halliburton Co. has a beta of 0.771, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.896%.

Viper Energy, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.12%. Halliburton Co. offers a yield of 1.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Viper Energy, Inc. pays 62.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Halliburton Co. pays out 45.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Viper Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues are $393M, which are smaller than Halliburton Co. quarterly revenues of $5.7B. Viper Energy, Inc.'s net income of -$198M is lower than Halliburton Co.'s net income of $589M. Notably, Viper Energy, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.90x while Halliburton Co.'s PE ratio is 23.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Viper Energy, Inc. is 5.00x versus 1.35x for Halliburton Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kinder Morgan, Inc. has a net margin of -50.38% compared to Viper Energy, Inc.'s net margin of 23.01%. Viper Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.85% beat Kinder Morgan, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.8%.

Viper Energy, Inc. has a consensus price target of $50.22, signalling upside risk potential of 10.04%. On the other hand Kinder Morgan, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $32.05 which suggests that it could fall by -2.09%. Given that Viper Energy, Inc. has higher upside potential than Kinder Morgan, Inc., analysts believe Viper Energy, Inc. is more attractive than Kinder Morgan, Inc..

Viper Energy, Inc. has a beta of 0.513, which suggesting that the stock is 48.73% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kinder Morgan, Inc. has a beta of 0.700, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.046%.

Viper Energy, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.12%. Kinder Morgan, Inc. offers a yield of 3.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Viper Energy, Inc. pays 62.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Kinder Morgan, Inc. pays out 85.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Viper Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues are $393M, which are smaller than Kinder Morgan, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.4B. Viper Energy, Inc.'s net income of -$198M is lower than Kinder Morgan, Inc.'s net income of $1B. Notably, Viper Energy, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.90x while Kinder Morgan, Inc.'s PE ratio is 23.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Viper Energy, Inc. is 5.00x versus 4.33x for Kinder Morgan, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mesa Royalty Trust has a net margin of -50.38% compared to Viper Energy, Inc.'s net margin of 47.97%. Viper Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.85% beat Mesa Royalty Trust's return on equity of 11.71%.

Viper Energy, Inc. has a consensus price target of $50.22, signalling upside risk potential of 10.04%. On the other hand Mesa Royalty Trust has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Viper Energy, Inc. has higher upside potential than Mesa Royalty Trust, analysts believe Viper Energy, Inc. is more attractive than Mesa Royalty Trust.

Viper Energy, Inc. has a beta of 0.513, which suggesting that the stock is 48.73% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mesa Royalty Trust has a beta of 0.477, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.328%.

Viper Energy, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.12%. Mesa Royalty Trust offers a yield of 4.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Viper Energy, Inc. pays 62.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Mesa Royalty Trust pays out 99.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Viper Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues are $393M, which are larger than Mesa Royalty Trust quarterly revenues of $150.1K. Viper Energy, Inc.'s net income of -$198M is lower than Mesa Royalty Trust's net income of $72K. Notably, Viper Energy, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.90x while Mesa Royalty Trust's PE ratio is 25.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Viper Energy, Inc. is 5.00x versus 14.69x for Mesa Royalty Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.