VNOM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CKX Lands, Inc. has a net margin of -50.38% compared to Viper Energy, Inc.'s net margin of 71.5%. Viper Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.85% beat CKX Lands, Inc.'s return on equity of 2.54%.

Viper Energy, Inc. has a consensus price target of $50.67, signalling upside risk potential of 32.95%. On the other hand CKX Lands, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Viper Energy, Inc. has higher upside potential than CKX Lands, Inc., analysts believe Viper Energy, Inc. is more attractive than CKX Lands, Inc..

Viper Energy, Inc. has a beta of 0.481, which suggesting that the stock is 51.908% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CKX Lands, Inc. has a beta of -0.206, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 120.592%.

Viper Energy, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.93%. CKX Lands, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Viper Energy, Inc. pays 62.86% of its earnings as a dividend. CKX Lands, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Viper Energy, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Viper Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues are $393M, which are larger than CKX Lands, Inc. quarterly revenues of $232.6K. Viper Energy, Inc.'s net income of -$198M is lower than CKX Lands, Inc.'s net income of $166.3K. Notably, Viper Energy, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.78x while CKX Lands, Inc.'s PE ratio is 40.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Viper Energy, Inc. is 4.18x versus 21.47x for CKX Lands, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Empire Petroleum Corp. has a net margin of -50.38% compared to Viper Energy, Inc.'s net margin of -40.95%. Viper Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.85% beat Empire Petroleum Corp.'s return on equity of -30.21%.

Viper Energy, Inc. has a consensus price target of $50.67, signalling upside risk potential of 32.95%. On the other hand Empire Petroleum Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Viper Energy, Inc. has higher upside potential than Empire Petroleum Corp., analysts believe Viper Energy, Inc. is more attractive than Empire Petroleum Corp..

Viper Energy, Inc. has a beta of 0.481, which suggesting that the stock is 51.908% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Empire Petroleum Corp. has a beta of 1.026, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.625%.

Viper Energy, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.93%. Empire Petroleum Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Viper Energy, Inc. pays 62.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Empire Petroleum Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Viper Energy, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Viper Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues are $393M, which are larger than Empire Petroleum Corp. quarterly revenues of $9.4M. Viper Energy, Inc.'s net income of -$198M is lower than Empire Petroleum Corp.'s net income of -$3.8M. Notably, Viper Energy, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.78x while Empire Petroleum Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Viper Energy, Inc. is 4.18x versus 2.71x for Empire Petroleum Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

US Energy Corp. has a net margin of -50.38% compared to Viper Energy, Inc.'s net margin of -192.23%. Viper Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.85% beat US Energy Corp.'s return on equity of -83.96%.

Viper Energy, Inc. has a consensus price target of $50.67, signalling upside risk potential of 32.95%. On the other hand US Energy Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $2.50 which suggests that it could grow by 165.9%. Given that US Energy Corp. has higher upside potential than Viper Energy, Inc., analysts believe US Energy Corp. is more attractive than Viper Energy, Inc..

Viper Energy, Inc. has a beta of 0.481, which suggesting that the stock is 51.908% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison US Energy Corp. has a beta of 0.460, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.953%.

Viper Energy, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.93%. US Energy Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Viper Energy, Inc. pays 62.86% of its earnings as a dividend. US Energy Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Viper Energy, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Viper Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues are $393M, which are larger than US Energy Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.7M. Viper Energy, Inc.'s net income of -$198M is lower than US Energy Corp.'s net income of -$3.3M. Notably, Viper Energy, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.78x while US Energy Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Viper Energy, Inc. is 4.18x versus 2.91x for US Energy Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Western Midstream Partners LP has a net margin of -50.38% compared to Viper Energy, Inc.'s net margin of 36.63%. Viper Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.85% beat Western Midstream Partners LP's return on equity of 40.53%.

Viper Energy, Inc. has a consensus price target of $50.67, signalling upside risk potential of 32.95%. On the other hand Western Midstream Partners LP has an analysts' consensus of $41.83 which suggests that it could grow by 6.91%. Given that Viper Energy, Inc. has higher upside potential than Western Midstream Partners LP, analysts believe Viper Energy, Inc. is more attractive than Western Midstream Partners LP.

Viper Energy, Inc. has a beta of 0.481, which suggesting that the stock is 51.908% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Western Midstream Partners LP has a beta of 0.763, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.664%.

Viper Energy, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.93%. Western Midstream Partners LP offers a yield of 9.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share. Viper Energy, Inc. pays 62.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Western Midstream Partners LP pays out 79.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Viper Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues are $393M, which are smaller than Western Midstream Partners LP quarterly revenues of $952.5M. Viper Energy, Inc.'s net income of -$198M is lower than Western Midstream Partners LP's net income of $348.9M. Notably, Viper Energy, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.78x while Western Midstream Partners LP's PE ratio is 11.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Viper Energy, Inc. is 4.18x versus 4.00x for Western Midstream Partners LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.