VNOM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Barnwell Industries has a net margin of 30.61% compared to Viper Energy's net margin of -42.82%. Viper Energy's return on equity of 10.68% beat Barnwell Industries's return on equity of -46.11%.

Viper Energy has a consensus price target of $53.60, signalling upside risk potential of 32.23%. On the other hand Barnwell Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Viper Energy has higher upside potential than Barnwell Industries, analysts believe Viper Energy is more attractive than Barnwell Industries.

Viper Energy has a beta of 1.056, which suggesting that the stock is 5.551% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Barnwell Industries has a beta of -0.295, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 129.502%.

Viper Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.65 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.31%. Barnwell Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Viper Energy pays 131.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Barnwell Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Viper Energy quarterly revenues are $245M, which are larger than Barnwell Industries quarterly revenues of $4.5M. Viper Energy's net income of $75M is higher than Barnwell Industries's net income of -$1.9M. Notably, Viper Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.76x while Barnwell Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Viper Energy is 4.65x versus 0.66x for Barnwell Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Diamondback Energy has a net margin of 30.61% compared to Viper Energy's net margin of 34.86%. Viper Energy's return on equity of 10.68% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 12.66%.

Viper Energy has a consensus price target of $53.60, signalling upside risk potential of 32.23%. On the other hand Diamondback Energy has an analysts' consensus of $183.20 which suggests that it could grow by 34.53%. Given that Diamondback Energy has higher upside potential than Viper Energy, analysts believe Diamondback Energy is more attractive than Viper Energy.

Viper Energy has a beta of 1.056, which suggesting that the stock is 5.551% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diamondback Energy has a beta of 1.063, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.263%.

Viper Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.65 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.31%. Diamondback Energy offers a yield of 3.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Viper Energy pays 131.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamondback Energy pays out 47.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamondback Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Viper Energy's is not.

Viper Energy quarterly revenues are $245M, which are smaller than Diamondback Energy quarterly revenues of $4B. Viper Energy's net income of $75M is lower than Diamondback Energy's net income of $1.4B. Notably, Viper Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.76x while Diamondback Energy's PE ratio is 8.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Viper Energy is 4.65x versus 2.56x for Diamondback Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NextDecade has a net margin of 30.61% compared to Viper Energy's net margin of --. Viper Energy's return on equity of 10.68% beat NextDecade's return on equity of --.

Viper Energy has a consensus price target of $53.60, signalling upside risk potential of 32.23%. On the other hand NextDecade has an analysts' consensus of $11.33 which suggests that it could grow by 51.72%. Given that NextDecade has higher upside potential than Viper Energy, analysts believe NextDecade is more attractive than Viper Energy.

Viper Energy has a beta of 1.056, which suggesting that the stock is 5.551% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NextDecade has a beta of 1.053, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.287%.

Viper Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.65 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.31%. NextDecade offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Viper Energy pays 131.86% of its earnings as a dividend. NextDecade pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Viper Energy quarterly revenues are $245M, which are larger than NextDecade quarterly revenues of --. Viper Energy's net income of $75M is higher than NextDecade's net income of -$88.8M. Notably, Viper Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.76x while NextDecade's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Viper Energy is 4.65x versus -- for NextDecade. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RPC has a net margin of 30.61% compared to Viper Energy's net margin of 3.61%. Viper Energy's return on equity of 10.68% beat RPC's return on equity of 7.14%.

Viper Energy has a consensus price target of $53.60, signalling upside risk potential of 32.23%. On the other hand RPC has an analysts' consensus of $6.25 which suggests that it could grow by 31.3%. Given that Viper Energy has higher upside potential than RPC, analysts believe Viper Energy is more attractive than RPC.

Viper Energy has a beta of 1.056, which suggesting that the stock is 5.551% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RPC has a beta of 0.861, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.947%.

Viper Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.65 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.31%. RPC offers a yield of 3.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Viper Energy pays 131.86% of its earnings as a dividend. RPC pays out 37.66% of its earnings as a dividend. RPC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Viper Energy's is not.

Viper Energy quarterly revenues are $245M, which are smaller than RPC quarterly revenues of $332.9M. Viper Energy's net income of $75M is higher than RPC's net income of $12M. Notably, Viper Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.76x while RPC's PE ratio is 13.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Viper Energy is 4.65x versus 0.74x for RPC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.