VEON Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Anghami has a net margin of 6.62% compared to VEON's net margin of --. VEON's return on equity of -- beat Anghami's return on equity of -153.11%.

VEON has a consensus price target of $63.23, signalling upside risk potential of 53.98%. On the other hand Anghami has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2935.71%. Given that Anghami has higher upside potential than VEON, analysts believe Anghami is more attractive than VEON.

VEON has a beta of 1.391, which suggesting that the stock is 39.138% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Anghami has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

VEON has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Anghami offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. VEON pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Anghami pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

VEON quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than Anghami quarterly revenues of --. VEON's net income of $68M is higher than Anghami's net income of --. Notably, VEON's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Anghami's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VEON is 0.72x versus 0.51x for Anghami. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Arena Group Holdings has a net margin of 6.62% compared to VEON's net margin of 11.79%. VEON's return on equity of -- beat The Arena Group Holdings's return on equity of --.

VEON has a consensus price target of $63.23, signalling upside risk potential of 53.98%. On the other hand The Arena Group Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 450%. Given that The Arena Group Holdings has higher upside potential than VEON, analysts believe The Arena Group Holdings is more attractive than VEON.

VEON has a beta of 1.391, which suggesting that the stock is 39.138% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Arena Group Holdings has a beta of 0.439, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.083%.

VEON has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Arena Group Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. VEON pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Arena Group Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

VEON quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than The Arena Group Holdings quarterly revenues of $33.6M. VEON's net income of $68M is higher than The Arena Group Holdings's net income of $4M. Notably, VEON's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while The Arena Group Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VEON is 0.72x versus 0.25x for The Arena Group Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mega Matrix has a net margin of 6.62% compared to VEON's net margin of -26.8%. VEON's return on equity of -- beat Mega Matrix's return on equity of -52.45%.

VEON has a consensus price target of $63.23, signalling upside risk potential of 53.98%. On the other hand Mega Matrix has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 124.73%. Given that Mega Matrix has higher upside potential than VEON, analysts believe Mega Matrix is more attractive than VEON.

VEON has a beta of 1.391, which suggesting that the stock is 39.138% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mega Matrix has a beta of 2.648, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 164.805%.

VEON has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mega Matrix offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. VEON pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mega Matrix pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

VEON quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than Mega Matrix quarterly revenues of $10.3M. VEON's net income of $68M is higher than Mega Matrix's net income of -$2.8M. Notably, VEON's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mega Matrix's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VEON is 0.72x versus 0.91x for Mega Matrix. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kartoon Studios has a net margin of 6.62% compared to VEON's net margin of -23.62%. VEON's return on equity of -- beat Kartoon Studios's return on equity of -77.33%.

VEON has a consensus price target of $63.23, signalling upside risk potential of 53.98%. On the other hand Kartoon Studios has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 7525.83%. Given that Kartoon Studios has higher upside potential than VEON, analysts believe Kartoon Studios is more attractive than VEON.

VEON has a beta of 1.391, which suggesting that the stock is 39.138% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kartoon Studios has a beta of 3.026, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 202.603%.

VEON has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kartoon Studios offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. VEON pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kartoon Studios pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

VEON quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than Kartoon Studios quarterly revenues of $8.7M. VEON's net income of $68M is higher than Kartoon Studios's net income of -$2.1M. Notably, VEON's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kartoon Studios's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VEON is 0.72x versus 0.70x for Kartoon Studios. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.