VALU Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CME Group, Inc. has a net margin of 75.06% compared to Value Line, Inc.'s net margin of 58.68%. Value Line, Inc.'s return on equity of 21.6% beat CME Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.68%.

Value Line, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CME Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $284.00 which suggests that it could grow by 3.96%. Given that CME Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Value Line, Inc., analysts believe CME Group, Inc. is more attractive than Value Line, Inc..

Value Line, Inc. has a beta of 1.246, which suggesting that the stock is 24.572% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CME Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.277, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.345%.

Value Line, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.3%. CME Group, Inc. offers a yield of 3.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.25 per share. Value Line, Inc. pays 55.77% of its earnings as a dividend. CME Group, Inc. pays out 107.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Value Line, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but CME Group, Inc.'s is not.

Value Line, Inc. quarterly revenues are $8.6M, which are smaller than CME Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Value Line, Inc.'s net income of $6.5M is lower than CME Group, Inc.'s net income of $902.3M. Notably, Value Line, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.10x while CME Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 26.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Value Line, Inc. is 10.44x versus 15.38x for CME Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Coinbase Global, Inc. has a net margin of 75.06% compared to Value Line, Inc.'s net margin of 29.46%. Value Line, Inc.'s return on equity of 21.6% beat Coinbase Global, Inc.'s return on equity of 27.94%.

Value Line, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Coinbase Global, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $383.46 which suggests that it could grow by 39.92%. Given that Coinbase Global, Inc. has higher upside potential than Value Line, Inc., analysts believe Coinbase Global, Inc. is more attractive than Value Line, Inc..

Value Line, Inc. has a beta of 1.246, which suggesting that the stock is 24.572% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coinbase Global, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Value Line, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.3%. Coinbase Global, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Value Line, Inc. pays 55.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Coinbase Global, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Value Line, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Value Line, Inc. quarterly revenues are $8.6M, which are smaller than Coinbase Global, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Value Line, Inc.'s net income of $6.5M is lower than Coinbase Global, Inc.'s net income of $432.6M. Notably, Value Line, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.10x while Coinbase Global, Inc.'s PE ratio is 23.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Value Line, Inc. is 10.44x versus 8.77x for Coinbase Global, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Morningstar, Inc. has a net margin of 75.06% compared to Value Line, Inc.'s net margin of 14.84%. Value Line, Inc.'s return on equity of 21.6% beat Morningstar, Inc.'s return on equity of 23.73%.

Value Line, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Morningstar, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $278.33 which suggests that it could grow by 27.75%. Given that Morningstar, Inc. has higher upside potential than Value Line, Inc., analysts believe Morningstar, Inc. is more attractive than Value Line, Inc..

Value Line, Inc. has a beta of 1.246, which suggesting that the stock is 24.572% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Morningstar, Inc. has a beta of 1.110, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.025%.

Value Line, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.3%. Morningstar, Inc. offers a yield of 0.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. Value Line, Inc. pays 55.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Morningstar, Inc. pays out 19.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Value Line, Inc. quarterly revenues are $8.6M, which are smaller than Morningstar, Inc. quarterly revenues of $617.4M. Value Line, Inc.'s net income of $6.5M is lower than Morningstar, Inc.'s net income of $91.6M. Notably, Value Line, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.10x while Morningstar, Inc.'s PE ratio is 24.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Value Line, Inc. is 10.44x versus 3.89x for Morningstar, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nasdaq, Inc. has a net margin of 75.06% compared to Value Line, Inc.'s net margin of 21.6%. Value Line, Inc.'s return on equity of 21.6% beat Nasdaq, Inc.'s return on equity of 14.09%.

Value Line, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nasdaq, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $103.13 which suggests that it could grow by 16.77%. Given that Nasdaq, Inc. has higher upside potential than Value Line, Inc., analysts believe Nasdaq, Inc. is more attractive than Value Line, Inc..

Value Line, Inc. has a beta of 1.246, which suggesting that the stock is 24.572% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nasdaq, Inc. has a beta of 1.020, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.019%.

Value Line, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.3%. Nasdaq, Inc. offers a yield of 1.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Value Line, Inc. pays 55.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Nasdaq, Inc. pays out 48.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Value Line, Inc. quarterly revenues are $8.6M, which are smaller than Nasdaq, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2B. Value Line, Inc.'s net income of $6.5M is lower than Nasdaq, Inc.'s net income of $423M. Notably, Value Line, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.10x while Nasdaq, Inc.'s PE ratio is 31.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Value Line, Inc. is 10.44x versus 6.27x for Nasdaq, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.