VALU Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Coinbase Global, Inc. has a net margin of 66.41% compared to Value Line, Inc.'s net margin of 29.46%. Value Line, Inc.'s return on equity of 21.09% beat Coinbase Global, Inc.'s return on equity of 27.94%.

Value Line, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Coinbase Global, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $357.17 which suggests that it could grow by 48.34%. Given that Coinbase Global, Inc. has higher upside potential than Value Line, Inc., analysts believe Coinbase Global, Inc. is more attractive than Value Line, Inc..

Value Line, Inc. has a beta of 1.206, which suggesting that the stock is 20.639% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coinbase Global, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Value Line, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.41%. Coinbase Global, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Value Line, Inc. pays 55.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Coinbase Global, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Value Line, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Value Line, Inc. quarterly revenues are $8.6M, which are smaller than Coinbase Global, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Value Line, Inc.'s net income of $5.7M is lower than Coinbase Global, Inc.'s net income of $432.6M. Notably, Value Line, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.54x while Coinbase Global, Inc.'s PE ratio is 20.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Value Line, Inc. is 10.19x versus 7.71x for Coinbase Global, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Morningstar, Inc. has a net margin of 66.41% compared to Value Line, Inc.'s net margin of 14.84%. Value Line, Inc.'s return on equity of 21.09% beat Morningstar, Inc.'s return on equity of 23.73%.

Value Line, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Morningstar, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $278.33 which suggests that it could grow by 28.37%. Given that Morningstar, Inc. has higher upside potential than Value Line, Inc., analysts believe Morningstar, Inc. is more attractive than Value Line, Inc..

Value Line, Inc. has a beta of 1.206, which suggesting that the stock is 20.639% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Morningstar, Inc. has a beta of 1.079, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.894%.

Value Line, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.41%. Morningstar, Inc. offers a yield of 0.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Value Line, Inc. pays 55.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Morningstar, Inc. pays out 19.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Value Line, Inc. quarterly revenues are $8.6M, which are smaller than Morningstar, Inc. quarterly revenues of $617.4M. Value Line, Inc.'s net income of $5.7M is lower than Morningstar, Inc.'s net income of $91.6M. Notably, Value Line, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.54x while Morningstar, Inc.'s PE ratio is 24.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Value Line, Inc. is 10.19x versus 3.87x for Morningstar, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nasdaq, Inc. has a net margin of 66.41% compared to Value Line, Inc.'s net margin of 21.6%. Value Line, Inc.'s return on equity of 21.09% beat Nasdaq, Inc.'s return on equity of 14.09%.

Value Line, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nasdaq, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $104.60 which suggests that it could grow by 6.47%. Given that Nasdaq, Inc. has higher upside potential than Value Line, Inc., analysts believe Nasdaq, Inc. is more attractive than Value Line, Inc..

Value Line, Inc. has a beta of 1.206, which suggesting that the stock is 20.639% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nasdaq, Inc. has a beta of 1.013, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.338%.

Value Line, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.41%. Nasdaq, Inc. offers a yield of 1.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Value Line, Inc. pays 55.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Nasdaq, Inc. pays out 48.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Value Line, Inc. quarterly revenues are $8.6M, which are smaller than Nasdaq, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2B. Value Line, Inc.'s net income of $5.7M is lower than Nasdaq, Inc.'s net income of $423M. Notably, Value Line, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.54x while Nasdaq, Inc.'s PE ratio is 35.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Value Line, Inc. is 10.19x versus 6.97x for Nasdaq, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.