TORO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Costamare has a net margin of 18.34% compared to Toro's net margin of 6.38%. Toro's return on equity of 59.63% beat Costamare's return on equity of 12.71%.

Toro has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Costamare has an analysts' consensus of $11.00 which suggests that it could grow by 19.96%. Given that Costamare has higher upside potential than Toro, analysts believe Costamare is more attractive than Toro.

Toro has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Costamare has a beta of 1.117, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.654%.

Toro has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Costamare offers a yield of 5.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Toro pays 5.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Costamare pays out 23.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Toro quarterly revenues are $5.3M, which are smaller than Costamare quarterly revenues of $548.4M. Toro's net income of $975.4K is lower than Costamare's net income of $35M. Notably, Toro's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.79x while Costamare's PE ratio is 3.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Toro is 1.90x versus 0.53x for Costamare. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gold and GemStone Mining has a net margin of 18.34% compared to Toro's net margin of --. Toro's return on equity of 59.63% beat Gold and GemStone Mining's return on equity of --.

Toro has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Gold and GemStone Mining has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Toro has higher upside potential than Gold and GemStone Mining, analysts believe Toro is more attractive than Gold and GemStone Mining.

Toro has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gold and GemStone Mining has a beta of 2.586, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 158.643%.

Toro has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gold and GemStone Mining offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Toro pays 5.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Gold and GemStone Mining pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Toro's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Toro quarterly revenues are $5.3M, which are larger than Gold and GemStone Mining quarterly revenues of --. Toro's net income of $975.4K is higher than Gold and GemStone Mining's net income of --. Notably, Toro's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.79x while Gold and GemStone Mining's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Toro is 1.90x versus -- for Gold and GemStone Mining. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Siem Industries has a net margin of 18.34% compared to Toro's net margin of --. Toro's return on equity of 59.63% beat Siem Industries's return on equity of --.

Toro has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Siem Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Toro has higher upside potential than Siem Industries, analysts believe Toro is more attractive than Siem Industries.

Toro has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Siem Industries has a beta of 0.227, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.295%.

Toro has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Siem Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Toro pays 5.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Siem Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Toro's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Toro quarterly revenues are $5.3M, which are larger than Siem Industries quarterly revenues of --. Toro's net income of $975.4K is higher than Siem Industries's net income of --. Notably, Toro's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.79x while Siem Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Toro is 1.90x versus 1.07x for Siem Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SFL has a net margin of 18.34% compared to Toro's net margin of 8.98%. Toro's return on equity of 59.63% beat SFL's return on equity of 12.11%.

Toro has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SFL has an analysts' consensus of $11.80 which suggests that it could grow by 51.28%. Given that SFL has higher upside potential than Toro, analysts believe SFL is more attractive than Toro.

Toro has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SFL has a beta of 0.579, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.087%.

Toro has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SFL offers a yield of 13.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Toro pays 5.55% of its earnings as a dividend. SFL pays out 106% of its earnings as a dividend. Toro's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but SFL's is not.

Toro quarterly revenues are $5.3M, which are smaller than SFL quarterly revenues of $225M. Toro's net income of $975.4K is lower than SFL's net income of $20.2M. Notably, Toro's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.79x while SFL's PE ratio is 7.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Toro is 1.90x versus 1.14x for SFL. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.