Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Sell
36
SAIC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$102.92
Seasonality move
:
-0.3%
Day range:
$101.63 - $103.11
52-week range:
$84.16 - $124.11
Dividend yield:
1.44%
P/E ratio:
13.10x
P/S ratio:
0.66x
P/B ratio:
3.06x
Volume:
501.2K
Avg. volume:
693.3K
1-year change:
-7.78%
Market cap:
$4.6B
Revenue:
$7.5B
EPS (TTM):
$7.84
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SAIC
Science Applications International Corp.
|
$1.9B | $2.15 | -2.94% | -8.7% | $117.11 |
|
LDOS
Leidos Holdings, Inc.
|
$4.3B | $2.72 | -1.4% | 21.25% | $218.08 |
|
PATH
UiPath, Inc.
|
$392.9M | $0.15 | 9.7% | 171.83% | $16.40 |
|
PSN
Parsons Corp.
|
$1.7B | $0.75 | -2.95% | -56.04% | $84.27 |
|
RNG
RingCentral, Inc.
|
$635.6M | $1.07 | 4.71% | -- | $33.00 |
|
WYY
WidePoint Corp.
|
$39.6M | -- | 6.83% | -- | $9.33 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SAIC
Science Applications International Corp.
|
$102.66 | $117.11 | $4.6B | 13.10x | $0.37 | 1.44% | 0.66x |
|
LDOS
Leidos Holdings, Inc.
|
$186.32 | $218.08 | $23.8B | 17.38x | $0.43 | 0.88% | 1.41x |
|
PATH
UiPath, Inc.
|
$15.96 | $16.40 | $8.5B | 37.64x | $0.00 | 0% | 5.62x |
|
PSN
Parsons Corp.
|
$62.74 | $84.27 | $6.7B | 17.86x | $0.00 | 0% | 1.07x |
|
RNG
RingCentral, Inc.
|
$29.24 | $33.00 | $2.5B | 206.79x | $0.00 | 0% | 1.08x |
|
WYY
WidePoint Corp.
|
$5.98 | $9.33 | $59.1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.39x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SAIC
Science Applications International Corp.
|
63.64% | -0.977 | 62.75% | 1.04x |
|
LDOS
Leidos Holdings, Inc.
|
51.58% | 0.594 | 21.53% | 1.36x |
|
PATH
UiPath, Inc.
|
4.09% | 2.320 | 0.97% | 2.41x |
|
PSN
Parsons Corp.
|
35.27% | 0.533 | 15.6% | 1.56x |
|
RNG
RingCentral, Inc.
|
155.53% | 1.625 | 59.59% | 0.45x |
|
WYY
WidePoint Corp.
|
28.75% | -0.059 | 10.28% | 0.93x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SAIC
Science Applications International Corp.
|
$227M | $127M | 9.27% | 24.02% | 6.81% | $120M |
|
LDOS
Leidos Holdings, Inc.
|
$821M | $535M | 14% | 30.51% | 11.97% | $680M |
|
PATH
UiPath, Inc.
|
$341.2M | $13.1M | 12.39% | 12.95% | 3.18% | $25.1M |
|
PSN
Parsons Corp.
|
$359.9M | $99.7M | 11.33% | 17.63% | 6.15% | $149.7M |
|
RNG
RingCentral, Inc.
|
$458.7M | $33.3M | 1.2% | -- | 5.21% | $124.5M |
|
WYY
WidePoint Corp.
|
$5M | -$460.6K | -12.59% | -17.34% | -1.28% | $5.9M |
Science Applications International Corp. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns SAIC or LDOS?
Leidos Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 4.18% compared to Science Applications International Corp.'s net margin of 8.26%. Science Applications International Corp.'s return on equity of 24.02% beat Leidos Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 30.51%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SAICScience Applications International Corp.12.17% $1.69 $4.2B LDOSLeidos Holdings, Inc.18.37% $2.82 $10.2B -
What do Analysts Say About SAIC or LDOS?
Science Applications International Corp. has a consensus price target of $117.11, signalling upside risk potential of 14.08%. On the other hand Leidos Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $218.08 which suggests that it could grow by 17.04%. Given that Leidos Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Science Applications International Corp., analysts believe Leidos Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Science Applications International Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SAICScience Applications International Corp.2 7 1 LDOSLeidos Holdings, Inc.7 6 0 -
Is SAIC or LDOS More Risky?
Science Applications International Corp. has a beta of 0.298, which suggesting that the stock is 70.197% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Leidos Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.583, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.731%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SAIC or LDOS?
Science Applications International Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.44%. Leidos Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share. Science Applications International Corp. pays 20.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Leidos Holdings, Inc. pays out 16.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SAIC or LDOS?
Science Applications International Corp. quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are smaller than Leidos Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.5B. Science Applications International Corp.'s net income of $78M is lower than Leidos Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $369M. Notably, Science Applications International Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.10x while Leidos Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 17.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Science Applications International Corp. is 0.66x versus 1.41x for Leidos Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SAICScience Applications International Corp.0.66x 13.10x $1.9B $78M LDOSLeidos Holdings, Inc.1.41x 17.38x $4.5B $369M
-
Which has Higher Returns SAIC or PATH?
UiPath, Inc. has a net margin of 4.18% compared to Science Applications International Corp.'s net margin of 48.37%. Science Applications International Corp.'s return on equity of 24.02% beat UiPath, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.95%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SAICScience Applications International Corp.12.17% $1.69 $4.2B PATHUiPath, Inc.83% $0.37 $2B -
What do Analysts Say About SAIC or PATH?
Science Applications International Corp. has a consensus price target of $117.11, signalling upside risk potential of 14.08%. On the other hand UiPath, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $16.40 which suggests that it could grow by 2.76%. Given that Science Applications International Corp. has higher upside potential than UiPath, Inc., analysts believe Science Applications International Corp. is more attractive than UiPath, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SAICScience Applications International Corp.2 7 1 PATHUiPath, Inc.1 18 0 -
Is SAIC or PATH More Risky?
Science Applications International Corp. has a beta of 0.298, which suggesting that the stock is 70.197% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison UiPath, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SAIC or PATH?
Science Applications International Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.44%. UiPath, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Science Applications International Corp. pays 20.65% of its earnings as a dividend. UiPath, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Science Applications International Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SAIC or PATH?
Science Applications International Corp. quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than UiPath, Inc. quarterly revenues of $411.1M. Science Applications International Corp.'s net income of $78M is lower than UiPath, Inc.'s net income of $198.8M. Notably, Science Applications International Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.10x while UiPath, Inc.'s PE ratio is 37.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Science Applications International Corp. is 0.66x versus 5.62x for UiPath, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SAICScience Applications International Corp.0.66x 13.10x $1.9B $78M PATHUiPath, Inc.5.62x 37.64x $411.1M $198.8M
-
Which has Higher Returns SAIC or PSN?
Parsons Corp. has a net margin of 4.18% compared to Science Applications International Corp.'s net margin of 5.04%. Science Applications International Corp.'s return on equity of 24.02% beat Parsons Corp.'s return on equity of 17.63%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SAICScience Applications International Corp.12.17% $1.69 $4.2B PSNParsons Corp.22.19% $0.59 $4.1B -
What do Analysts Say About SAIC or PSN?
Science Applications International Corp. has a consensus price target of $117.11, signalling upside risk potential of 14.08%. On the other hand Parsons Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $84.27 which suggests that it could grow by 34.32%. Given that Parsons Corp. has higher upside potential than Science Applications International Corp., analysts believe Parsons Corp. is more attractive than Science Applications International Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SAICScience Applications International Corp.2 7 1 PSNParsons Corp.9 3 0 -
Is SAIC or PSN More Risky?
Science Applications International Corp. has a beta of 0.298, which suggesting that the stock is 70.197% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Parsons Corp. has a beta of 0.654, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.582%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SAIC or PSN?
Science Applications International Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.44%. Parsons Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Science Applications International Corp. pays 20.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Parsons Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Science Applications International Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SAIC or PSN?
Science Applications International Corp. quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than Parsons Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Science Applications International Corp.'s net income of $78M is lower than Parsons Corp.'s net income of $81.8M. Notably, Science Applications International Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.10x while Parsons Corp.'s PE ratio is 17.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Science Applications International Corp. is 0.66x versus 1.07x for Parsons Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SAICScience Applications International Corp.0.66x 13.10x $1.9B $78M PSNParsons Corp.1.07x 17.86x $1.6B $81.8M
-
Which has Higher Returns SAIC or RNG?
RingCentral, Inc. has a net margin of 4.18% compared to Science Applications International Corp.'s net margin of 2.75%. Science Applications International Corp.'s return on equity of 24.02% beat RingCentral, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SAICScience Applications International Corp.12.17% $1.69 $4.2B RNGRingCentral, Inc.71.83% $0.19 $961.2M -
What do Analysts Say About SAIC or RNG?
Science Applications International Corp. has a consensus price target of $117.11, signalling upside risk potential of 14.08%. On the other hand RingCentral, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $33.00 which suggests that it could grow by 12.86%. Given that Science Applications International Corp. has higher upside potential than RingCentral, Inc., analysts believe Science Applications International Corp. is more attractive than RingCentral, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SAICScience Applications International Corp.2 7 1 RNGRingCentral, Inc.4 10 0 -
Is SAIC or RNG More Risky?
Science Applications International Corp. has a beta of 0.298, which suggesting that the stock is 70.197% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RingCentral, Inc. has a beta of 1.294, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.372%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SAIC or RNG?
Science Applications International Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.44%. RingCentral, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Science Applications International Corp. pays 20.65% of its earnings as a dividend. RingCentral, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Science Applications International Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SAIC or RNG?
Science Applications International Corp. quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than RingCentral, Inc. quarterly revenues of $638.7M. Science Applications International Corp.'s net income of $78M is higher than RingCentral, Inc.'s net income of $17.6M. Notably, Science Applications International Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.10x while RingCentral, Inc.'s PE ratio is 206.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Science Applications International Corp. is 0.66x versus 1.08x for RingCentral, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SAICScience Applications International Corp.0.66x 13.10x $1.9B $78M RNGRingCentral, Inc.1.08x 206.79x $638.7M $17.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns SAIC or WYY?
WidePoint Corp. has a net margin of 4.18% compared to Science Applications International Corp.'s net margin of -1.55%. Science Applications International Corp.'s return on equity of 24.02% beat WidePoint Corp.'s return on equity of -17.34%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SAICScience Applications International Corp.12.17% $1.69 $4.2B WYYWidePoint Corp.13.98% -$0.06 $17.1M -
What do Analysts Say About SAIC or WYY?
Science Applications International Corp. has a consensus price target of $117.11, signalling upside risk potential of 14.08%. On the other hand WidePoint Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $9.33 which suggests that it could grow by 56.08%. Given that WidePoint Corp. has higher upside potential than Science Applications International Corp., analysts believe WidePoint Corp. is more attractive than Science Applications International Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SAICScience Applications International Corp.2 7 1 WYYWidePoint Corp.3 0 0 -
Is SAIC or WYY More Risky?
Science Applications International Corp. has a beta of 0.298, which suggesting that the stock is 70.197% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WidePoint Corp. has a beta of 1.284, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.408%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SAIC or WYY?
Science Applications International Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.44%. WidePoint Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Science Applications International Corp. pays 20.65% of its earnings as a dividend. WidePoint Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Science Applications International Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SAIC or WYY?
Science Applications International Corp. quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than WidePoint Corp. quarterly revenues of $36.1M. Science Applications International Corp.'s net income of $78M is higher than WidePoint Corp.'s net income of -$559.2K. Notably, Science Applications International Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.10x while WidePoint Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Science Applications International Corp. is 0.66x versus 0.39x for WidePoint Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SAICScience Applications International Corp.0.66x 13.10x $1.9B $78M WYYWidePoint Corp.0.39x -- $36.1M -$559.2K
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
60
AAOI alert for Dec 24
Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. [AAOI] is up 5.1% over the past day.
Buy
85
HUT alert for Dec 24
Hut 8 Corp. [HUT] is up 0.65% over the past day.
Buy
63
GPCR alert for Dec 24
Structure Therapeutics, Inc. [GPCR] is down 2.36% over the past day.
