Is Revolution Medicines a Good Stock to Own?
Though it’s still quite early in the year, pharmaceutical startup…
Sell
47
SAIC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$110.49
Seasonality move
:
-0.33%
Day range:
$107.22 - $110.95
52-week range:
$84.16 - $124.11
Dividend yield:
1.34%
P/E ratio:
14.12x
P/S ratio:
0.71x
P/B ratio:
3.30x
Volume:
408.8K
Avg. volume:
681.1K
1-year change:
-4.67%
Market cap:
$5B
Revenue:
$7.5B
EPS (TTM):
$7.84
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SAIC
Science Applications International Corp.
|
$1.9B | $2.15 | -2.94% | -8.7% | $118.33 |
|
INLX
Intellinetics, Inc.
|
$4.1M | -- | -3.16% | -- | $14.50 |
|
LDOS
Leidos Holdings, Inc.
|
$4.3B | $2.60 | 3.31% | 8.01% | $220.00 |
|
PATH
UiPath, Inc.
|
$392.9M | $0.15 | 9.71% | 172.51% | $16.40 |
|
SGN
Signing Day Sports, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
WYY
WidePoint Corp.
|
$40.3M | -- | 6.83% | -- | $9.33 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SAIC
Science Applications International Corp.
|
$110.65 | $118.33 | $5B | 14.12x | $0.37 | 1.34% | 0.71x |
|
INLX
Intellinetics, Inc.
|
$8.07 | $14.50 | $36.1M | 248.75x | $0.00 | 0% | 2.09x |
|
LDOS
Leidos Holdings, Inc.
|
$193.36 | $220.00 | $24.7B | 18.04x | $0.43 | 0.84% | 1.46x |
|
PATH
UiPath, Inc.
|
$14.79 | $16.40 | $7.9B | 34.88x | $0.00 | 0% | 5.20x |
|
SGN
Signing Day Sports, Inc.
|
$0.18 | -- | $731.2K | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.27x |
|
WYY
WidePoint Corp.
|
$6.84 | $9.33 | $67.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.45x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SAIC
Science Applications International Corp.
|
63.64% | -1.579 | 62.75% | 1.04x |
|
INLX
Intellinetics, Inc.
|
14.18% | -0.743 | 3.65% | 0.89x |
|
LDOS
Leidos Holdings, Inc.
|
51.58% | 0.256 | 21.53% | 1.36x |
|
PATH
UiPath, Inc.
|
4.09% | 1.972 | 0.97% | 2.41x |
|
SGN
Signing Day Sports, Inc.
|
818.95% | 15.957 | 1.08% | 0.21x |
|
WYY
WidePoint Corp.
|
28.75% | -0.075 | 10.28% | 0.93x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SAIC
Science Applications International Corp.
|
$227M | $127M | 9.27% | 24.02% | 6.81% | $120M |
|
INLX
Intellinetics, Inc.
|
$2.3M | -$379.2K | -12.47% | -15.79% | -9.48% | $1.1M |
|
LDOS
Leidos Holdings, Inc.
|
$821M | $535M | 14% | 30.51% | 11.97% | $680M |
|
PATH
UiPath, Inc.
|
$341.2M | $13.1M | 12.39% | 12.95% | 3.18% | $25.1M |
|
SGN
Signing Day Sports, Inc.
|
-$31.1K | -$868.6K | -6026.52% | -- | -2838.56% | -$441.2K |
|
WYY
WidePoint Corp.
|
$5M | -$460.6K | -12.59% | -17.34% | -1.28% | $5.9M |
Science Applications International Corp. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns SAIC or INLX?
Intellinetics, Inc. has a net margin of 4.18% compared to Science Applications International Corp.'s net margin of -9.24%. Science Applications International Corp.'s return on equity of 24.02% beat Intellinetics, Inc.'s return on equity of -15.79%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SAICScience Applications International Corp.12.17% $1.69 $4.2B INLXIntellinetics, Inc.56.29% -$0.08 $13.3M -
What do Analysts Say About SAIC or INLX?
Science Applications International Corp. has a consensus price target of $118.33, signalling upside risk potential of 6.94%. On the other hand Intellinetics, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $14.50 which suggests that it could grow by 79.68%. Given that Intellinetics, Inc. has higher upside potential than Science Applications International Corp., analysts believe Intellinetics, Inc. is more attractive than Science Applications International Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SAICScience Applications International Corp.2 7 1 INLXIntellinetics, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is SAIC or INLX More Risky?
Science Applications International Corp. has a beta of 0.278, which suggesting that the stock is 72.233% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intellinetics, Inc. has a beta of 0.232, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.847%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SAIC or INLX?
Science Applications International Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.34%. Intellinetics, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Science Applications International Corp. pays 20.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Intellinetics, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Science Applications International Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SAIC or INLX?
Science Applications International Corp. quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than Intellinetics, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4M. Science Applications International Corp.'s net income of $78M is higher than Intellinetics, Inc.'s net income of -$369.8K. Notably, Science Applications International Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.12x while Intellinetics, Inc.'s PE ratio is 248.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Science Applications International Corp. is 0.71x versus 2.09x for Intellinetics, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SAICScience Applications International Corp.0.71x 14.12x $1.9B $78M INLXIntellinetics, Inc.2.09x 248.75x $4M -$369.8K
-
Which has Higher Returns SAIC or LDOS?
Leidos Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 4.18% compared to Science Applications International Corp.'s net margin of 8.26%. Science Applications International Corp.'s return on equity of 24.02% beat Leidos Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 30.51%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SAICScience Applications International Corp.12.17% $1.69 $4.2B LDOSLeidos Holdings, Inc.18.37% $2.82 $10.2B -
What do Analysts Say About SAIC or LDOS?
Science Applications International Corp. has a consensus price target of $118.33, signalling upside risk potential of 6.94%. On the other hand Leidos Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $220.00 which suggests that it could grow by 13.78%. Given that Leidos Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Science Applications International Corp., analysts believe Leidos Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Science Applications International Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SAICScience Applications International Corp.2 7 1 LDOSLeidos Holdings, Inc.6 7 0 -
Is SAIC or LDOS More Risky?
Science Applications International Corp. has a beta of 0.278, which suggesting that the stock is 72.233% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Leidos Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.585, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.51%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SAIC or LDOS?
Science Applications International Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.34%. Leidos Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share. Science Applications International Corp. pays 20.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Leidos Holdings, Inc. pays out 16.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SAIC or LDOS?
Science Applications International Corp. quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are smaller than Leidos Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.5B. Science Applications International Corp.'s net income of $78M is lower than Leidos Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $369M. Notably, Science Applications International Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.12x while Leidos Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 18.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Science Applications International Corp. is 0.71x versus 1.46x for Leidos Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SAICScience Applications International Corp.0.71x 14.12x $1.9B $78M LDOSLeidos Holdings, Inc.1.46x 18.04x $4.5B $369M
-
Which has Higher Returns SAIC or PATH?
UiPath, Inc. has a net margin of 4.18% compared to Science Applications International Corp.'s net margin of 48.37%. Science Applications International Corp.'s return on equity of 24.02% beat UiPath, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.95%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SAICScience Applications International Corp.12.17% $1.69 $4.2B PATHUiPath, Inc.83% $0.37 $2B -
What do Analysts Say About SAIC or PATH?
Science Applications International Corp. has a consensus price target of $118.33, signalling upside risk potential of 6.94%. On the other hand UiPath, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $16.40 which suggests that it could grow by 10.89%. Given that UiPath, Inc. has higher upside potential than Science Applications International Corp., analysts believe UiPath, Inc. is more attractive than Science Applications International Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SAICScience Applications International Corp.2 7 1 PATHUiPath, Inc.1 18 0 -
Is SAIC or PATH More Risky?
Science Applications International Corp. has a beta of 0.278, which suggesting that the stock is 72.233% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison UiPath, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SAIC or PATH?
Science Applications International Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.34%. UiPath, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Science Applications International Corp. pays 20.65% of its earnings as a dividend. UiPath, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Science Applications International Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SAIC or PATH?
Science Applications International Corp. quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than UiPath, Inc. quarterly revenues of $411.1M. Science Applications International Corp.'s net income of $78M is lower than UiPath, Inc.'s net income of $198.8M. Notably, Science Applications International Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.12x while UiPath, Inc.'s PE ratio is 34.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Science Applications International Corp. is 0.71x versus 5.20x for UiPath, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SAICScience Applications International Corp.0.71x 14.12x $1.9B $78M PATHUiPath, Inc.5.20x 34.88x $411.1M $198.8M
-
Which has Higher Returns SAIC or SGN?
Signing Day Sports, Inc. has a net margin of 4.18% compared to Science Applications International Corp.'s net margin of -1850.98%. Science Applications International Corp.'s return on equity of 24.02% beat Signing Day Sports, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SAICScience Applications International Corp.12.17% $1.69 $4.2B SGNSigning Day Sports, Inc.-101.63% -$0.14 $9.5K -
What do Analysts Say About SAIC or SGN?
Science Applications International Corp. has a consensus price target of $118.33, signalling upside risk potential of 6.94%. On the other hand Signing Day Sports, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Science Applications International Corp. has higher upside potential than Signing Day Sports, Inc., analysts believe Science Applications International Corp. is more attractive than Signing Day Sports, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SAICScience Applications International Corp.2 7 1 SGNSigning Day Sports, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is SAIC or SGN More Risky?
Science Applications International Corp. has a beta of 0.278, which suggesting that the stock is 72.233% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Signing Day Sports, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SAIC or SGN?
Science Applications International Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.34%. Signing Day Sports, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Science Applications International Corp. pays 20.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Signing Day Sports, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Science Applications International Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SAIC or SGN?
Science Applications International Corp. quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than Signing Day Sports, Inc. quarterly revenues of $30.6K. Science Applications International Corp.'s net income of $78M is higher than Signing Day Sports, Inc.'s net income of -$566.4K. Notably, Science Applications International Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.12x while Signing Day Sports, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Science Applications International Corp. is 0.71x versus 1.27x for Signing Day Sports, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SAICScience Applications International Corp.0.71x 14.12x $1.9B $78M SGNSigning Day Sports, Inc.1.27x -- $30.6K -$566.4K
-
Which has Higher Returns SAIC or WYY?
WidePoint Corp. has a net margin of 4.18% compared to Science Applications International Corp.'s net margin of -1.55%. Science Applications International Corp.'s return on equity of 24.02% beat WidePoint Corp.'s return on equity of -17.34%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SAICScience Applications International Corp.12.17% $1.69 $4.2B WYYWidePoint Corp.13.98% -$0.06 $17.1M -
What do Analysts Say About SAIC or WYY?
Science Applications International Corp. has a consensus price target of $118.33, signalling upside risk potential of 6.94%. On the other hand WidePoint Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $9.33 which suggests that it could grow by 36.45%. Given that WidePoint Corp. has higher upside potential than Science Applications International Corp., analysts believe WidePoint Corp. is more attractive than Science Applications International Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SAICScience Applications International Corp.2 7 1 WYYWidePoint Corp.3 0 0 -
Is SAIC or WYY More Risky?
Science Applications International Corp. has a beta of 0.278, which suggesting that the stock is 72.233% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WidePoint Corp. has a beta of 1.330, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.007%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SAIC or WYY?
Science Applications International Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.34%. WidePoint Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Science Applications International Corp. pays 20.65% of its earnings as a dividend. WidePoint Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Science Applications International Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SAIC or WYY?
Science Applications International Corp. quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than WidePoint Corp. quarterly revenues of $36.1M. Science Applications International Corp.'s net income of $78M is higher than WidePoint Corp.'s net income of -$559.2K. Notably, Science Applications International Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.12x while WidePoint Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Science Applications International Corp. is 0.71x versus 0.45x for WidePoint Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SAICScience Applications International Corp.0.71x 14.12x $1.9B $78M WYYWidePoint Corp.0.45x -- $36.1M -$559.2K
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Has Vistra Stock Gone Up?
Integrated power generation business Vistra (NYSE:VST) surprised investors recently when…
Why Is Amkor Stock Up So Much?
Semiconductor packaging and testing major Amkor (NASDAQ:AMKR) has started 2026…
Stock Ideas
Buy
56
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
63
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 41x
Sell
50
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 41x
Alerts
Buy
80
BNR alert for Jan 16
Burning Rock Biotech Ltd. [BNR] is down 3.93% over the past day.
Buy
90
PEN alert for Jan 16
Penumbra, Inc. [PEN] is up 0.35% over the past day.
Buy
100
TLN alert for Jan 16
Talen Energy Corp. [TLN] is down 11.31% over the past day.
