Financhill
Buy
60

SAIC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$121.09
Seasonality move :
3.82%
Day range:
$120.64 - $122.22
52-week range:
$94.68 - $156.34
Dividend yield:
1.22%
P/E ratio:
16.84x
P/S ratio:
0.82x
P/B ratio:
3.67x
Volume:
425.7K
Avg. volume:
646.9K
1-year change:
-10.81%
Market cap:
$5.8B
Revenue:
$7.5B
EPS (TTM):
$7.19

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
SAIC
Science Applications International
$1.9B $2.15 1.4% 46.34% $125.37
CSPI
CSP
-- -- -- -- --
INLX
Intellinetics
$4.5M -- -1.16% -- $17.50
LDOS
Leidos Holdings
$4.1B $2.50 2.48% 11.16% $173.01
SGN
Signing Day Sports
-- -- -- -- --
WYY
WidePoint
$38.6M -- 12.74% -- $6.50
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
SAIC
Science Applications International
$121.08 $125.37 $5.8B 16.84x $0.37 1.22% 0.82x
CSPI
CSP
$16.43 -- $162.3M 1,643.00x $0.03 0.73% 2.76x
INLX
Intellinetics
$13.50 $17.50 $57.5M 248.75x $0.00 0% 3.24x
LDOS
Leidos Holdings
$155.70 $173.01 $20B 15.66x $0.40 1% 1.24x
SGN
Signing Day Sports
$0.60 -- $1.2M -- $0.00 0% 0.47x
WYY
WidePoint
$5.47 $6.50 $53.5M -- $0.00 0% 0.36x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
SAIC
Science Applications International
58.47% -1.073 42.71% 0.76x
CSPI
CSP
5.16% 2.580 1.63% 2.90x
INLX
Intellinetics
10.88% -0.049 2.22% 0.76x
LDOS
Leidos Holdings
54.67% -0.154 29.59% 1.27x
SGN
Signing Day Sports
-22.66% 7.315 5.11% 0.01x
WYY
WidePoint
-- 4.013 -- 1.02x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
SAIC
Science Applications International
$232M $136M 9.48% 21.66% 7.4% $100M
CSPI
CSP
$4.6M -$354K 0.44% 0.46% 2.77% $1.7M
INLX
Intellinetics
$2.8M -$12.9K -4.48% -5.34% -0.3% $73.3K
LDOS
Leidos Holdings
$757M $527M 14.46% 29.95% 12.42% $36M
SGN
Signing Day Sports
$25.1K -$1.4M -805.48% -- -2675.61% -$526.4K
WYY
WidePoint
$4.7M -$451K -20.12% -20.12% -1.13% $1.8M

Science Applications International vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns SAIC or CSPI?

    CSP has a net margin of 5.33% compared to Science Applications International's net margin of 3.01%. Science Applications International's return on equity of 21.66% beat CSP's return on equity of 0.46%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    SAIC
    Science Applications International
    12.62% $2.00 $3.8B
    CSPI
    CSP
    29.13% $0.05 $50M
  • What do Analysts Say About SAIC or CSPI?

    Science Applications International has a consensus price target of $125.37, signalling upside risk potential of 3.55%. On the other hand CSP has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Science Applications International has higher upside potential than CSP, analysts believe Science Applications International is more attractive than CSP.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    SAIC
    Science Applications International
    2 7 0
    CSPI
    CSP
    0 0 0
  • Is SAIC or CSPI More Risky?

    Science Applications International has a beta of 0.547, which suggesting that the stock is 45.277% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CSP has a beta of 0.876, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.413%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock SAIC or CSPI?

    Science Applications International has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.22%. CSP offers a yield of 0.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Science Applications International pays 20.72% of its earnings as a dividend. CSP pays out -312.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Science Applications International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios SAIC or CSPI?

    Science Applications International quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than CSP quarterly revenues of $15.7M. Science Applications International's net income of $98M is higher than CSP's net income of $472K. Notably, Science Applications International's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.84x while CSP's PE ratio is 1,643.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Science Applications International is 0.82x versus 2.76x for CSP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    SAIC
    Science Applications International
    0.82x 16.84x $1.8B $98M
    CSPI
    CSP
    2.76x 1,643.00x $15.7M $472K
  • Which has Higher Returns SAIC or INLX?

    Intellinetics has a net margin of 5.33% compared to Science Applications International's net margin of -1.26%. Science Applications International's return on equity of 21.66% beat Intellinetics's return on equity of -5.34%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    SAIC
    Science Applications International
    12.62% $2.00 $3.8B
    INLX
    Intellinetics
    65.8% -$0.01 $11.9M
  • What do Analysts Say About SAIC or INLX?

    Science Applications International has a consensus price target of $125.37, signalling upside risk potential of 3.55%. On the other hand Intellinetics has an analysts' consensus of $17.50 which suggests that it could grow by 29.64%. Given that Intellinetics has higher upside potential than Science Applications International, analysts believe Intellinetics is more attractive than Science Applications International.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    SAIC
    Science Applications International
    2 7 0
    INLX
    Intellinetics
    0 0 0
  • Is SAIC or INLX More Risky?

    Science Applications International has a beta of 0.547, which suggesting that the stock is 45.277% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intellinetics has a beta of 0.548, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.204%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock SAIC or INLX?

    Science Applications International has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.22%. Intellinetics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Science Applications International pays 20.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Intellinetics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Science Applications International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios SAIC or INLX?

    Science Applications International quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than Intellinetics quarterly revenues of $4.3M. Science Applications International's net income of $98M is higher than Intellinetics's net income of -$53.7K. Notably, Science Applications International's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.84x while Intellinetics's PE ratio is 248.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Science Applications International is 0.82x versus 3.24x for Intellinetics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    SAIC
    Science Applications International
    0.82x 16.84x $1.8B $98M
    INLX
    Intellinetics
    3.24x 248.75x $4.3M -$53.7K
  • Which has Higher Returns SAIC or LDOS?

    Leidos Holdings has a net margin of 5.33% compared to Science Applications International's net margin of 8.55%. Science Applications International's return on equity of 21.66% beat Leidos Holdings's return on equity of 29.95%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    SAIC
    Science Applications International
    12.62% $2.00 $3.8B
    LDOS
    Leidos Holdings
    17.83% $2.77 $9.4B
  • What do Analysts Say About SAIC or LDOS?

    Science Applications International has a consensus price target of $125.37, signalling upside risk potential of 3.55%. On the other hand Leidos Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $173.01 which suggests that it could grow by 11.12%. Given that Leidos Holdings has higher upside potential than Science Applications International, analysts believe Leidos Holdings is more attractive than Science Applications International.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    SAIC
    Science Applications International
    2 7 0
    LDOS
    Leidos Holdings
    8 7 0
  • Is SAIC or LDOS More Risky?

    Science Applications International has a beta of 0.547, which suggesting that the stock is 45.277% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Leidos Holdings has a beta of 0.652, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.769%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock SAIC or LDOS?

    Science Applications International has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.22%. Leidos Holdings offers a yield of 1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Science Applications International pays 20.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Leidos Holdings pays out 16.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios SAIC or LDOS?

    Science Applications International quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than Leidos Holdings quarterly revenues of $4.2B. Science Applications International's net income of $98M is lower than Leidos Holdings's net income of $363M. Notably, Science Applications International's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.84x while Leidos Holdings's PE ratio is 15.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Science Applications International is 0.82x versus 1.24x for Leidos Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    SAIC
    Science Applications International
    0.82x 16.84x $1.8B $98M
    LDOS
    Leidos Holdings
    1.24x 15.66x $4.2B $363M
  • Which has Higher Returns SAIC or SGN?

    Signing Day Sports has a net margin of 5.33% compared to Science Applications International's net margin of -2893.73%. Science Applications International's return on equity of 21.66% beat Signing Day Sports's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    SAIC
    Science Applications International
    12.62% $2.00 $3.8B
    SGN
    Signing Day Sports
    45.34% -$4.32 -$1.2M
  • What do Analysts Say About SAIC or SGN?

    Science Applications International has a consensus price target of $125.37, signalling upside risk potential of 3.55%. On the other hand Signing Day Sports has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Science Applications International has higher upside potential than Signing Day Sports, analysts believe Science Applications International is more attractive than Signing Day Sports.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    SAIC
    Science Applications International
    2 7 0
    SGN
    Signing Day Sports
    0 0 0
  • Is SAIC or SGN More Risky?

    Science Applications International has a beta of 0.547, which suggesting that the stock is 45.277% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Signing Day Sports has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock SAIC or SGN?

    Science Applications International has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.22%. Signing Day Sports offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Science Applications International pays 20.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Signing Day Sports pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Science Applications International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios SAIC or SGN?

    Science Applications International quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than Signing Day Sports quarterly revenues of $55.4K. Science Applications International's net income of $98M is higher than Signing Day Sports's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Science Applications International's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.84x while Signing Day Sports's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Science Applications International is 0.82x versus 0.47x for Signing Day Sports. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    SAIC
    Science Applications International
    0.82x 16.84x $1.8B $98M
    SGN
    Signing Day Sports
    0.47x -- $55.4K -$1.6M
  • Which has Higher Returns SAIC or WYY?

    WidePoint has a net margin of 5.33% compared to Science Applications International's net margin of -1.23%. Science Applications International's return on equity of 21.66% beat WidePoint's return on equity of -20.12%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    SAIC
    Science Applications International
    12.62% $2.00 $3.8B
    WYY
    WidePoint
    13.55% -$0.04 $13.8M
  • What do Analysts Say About SAIC or WYY?

    Science Applications International has a consensus price target of $125.37, signalling upside risk potential of 3.55%. On the other hand WidePoint has an analysts' consensus of $6.50 which suggests that it could grow by 18.83%. Given that WidePoint has higher upside potential than Science Applications International, analysts believe WidePoint is more attractive than Science Applications International.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    SAIC
    Science Applications International
    2 7 0
    WYY
    WidePoint
    1 0 0
  • Is SAIC or WYY More Risky?

    Science Applications International has a beta of 0.547, which suggesting that the stock is 45.277% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WidePoint has a beta of 1.805, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.475%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock SAIC or WYY?

    Science Applications International has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.22%. WidePoint offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Science Applications International pays 20.72% of its earnings as a dividend. WidePoint pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Science Applications International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios SAIC or WYY?

    Science Applications International quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than WidePoint quarterly revenues of $34.6M. Science Applications International's net income of $98M is higher than WidePoint's net income of -$425.2K. Notably, Science Applications International's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.84x while WidePoint's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Science Applications International is 0.82x versus 0.36x for WidePoint. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    SAIC
    Science Applications International
    0.82x 16.84x $1.8B $98M
    WYY
    WidePoint
    0.36x -- $34.6M -$425.2K

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is Spotify a Millionaire-Maker Stock?
Is Spotify a Millionaire-Maker Stock?

Spotify (NYSE:SPOT) may seem like an expensive proposition trading closer…

What Is a Millionaire-Maker Stock?
What Is a Millionaire-Maker Stock?

From time to time, investors will run across the term…

5 Investors to Follow Other Than Warren Buffett
5 Investors to Follow Other Than Warren Buffett

There is no doubt that Warren Buffett is one of…

Stock Ideas

Buy
68
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Sell
39
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x

Buy
61
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.8T
P/E Ratio: 40x

Alerts

Buy
60
RGC alert for May 10

Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 79.25% over the past day.

Buy
97
NGVC alert for May 10

Natural Grocers by Vitamin Cottage [NGVC] is up 30.26% over the past day.

Sell
38
ONTO alert for May 10

Onto Innovation [ONTO] is down 30.17% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock