SAIC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Intellinetics has a net margin of 5.33% compared to Science Applications International's net margin of -1.26%. Science Applications International's return on equity of 21.66% beat Intellinetics's return on equity of -5.34%.

Science Applications International has a consensus price target of $126.28, signalling upside risk potential of 3.58%. On the other hand Intellinetics has an analysts' consensus of $17.50 which suggests that it could grow by 34.62%. Given that Intellinetics has higher upside potential than Science Applications International, analysts believe Intellinetics is more attractive than Science Applications International.

Science Applications International has a beta of 0.547, which suggesting that the stock is 45.277% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intellinetics has a beta of 0.548, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.204%.

Science Applications International has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.21%. Intellinetics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Science Applications International pays 20.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Intellinetics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Science Applications International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Science Applications International quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than Intellinetics quarterly revenues of $4.3M. Science Applications International's net income of $98M is higher than Intellinetics's net income of -$53.7K. Notably, Science Applications International's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.96x while Intellinetics's PE ratio is 248.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Science Applications International is 0.82x versus 3.12x for Intellinetics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Leidos Holdings has a net margin of 5.33% compared to Science Applications International's net margin of 8.55%. Science Applications International's return on equity of 21.66% beat Leidos Holdings's return on equity of 29.95%.

Science Applications International has a consensus price target of $126.28, signalling upside risk potential of 3.58%. On the other hand Leidos Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $174.34 which suggests that it could grow by 11.22%. Given that Leidos Holdings has higher upside potential than Science Applications International, analysts believe Leidos Holdings is more attractive than Science Applications International.

Science Applications International has a beta of 0.547, which suggesting that the stock is 45.277% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Leidos Holdings has a beta of 0.652, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.769%.

Science Applications International has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.21%. Leidos Holdings offers a yield of 1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Science Applications International pays 20.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Leidos Holdings pays out 16.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Science Applications International quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than Leidos Holdings quarterly revenues of $4.2B. Science Applications International's net income of $98M is lower than Leidos Holdings's net income of $363M. Notably, Science Applications International's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.96x while Leidos Holdings's PE ratio is 15.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Science Applications International is 0.82x versus 1.25x for Leidos Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Signing Day Sports has a net margin of 5.33% compared to Science Applications International's net margin of -2893.73%. Science Applications International's return on equity of 21.66% beat Signing Day Sports's return on equity of --.

Science Applications International has a consensus price target of $126.28, signalling upside risk potential of 3.58%. On the other hand Signing Day Sports has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Science Applications International has higher upside potential than Signing Day Sports, analysts believe Science Applications International is more attractive than Signing Day Sports.

Science Applications International has a beta of 0.547, which suggesting that the stock is 45.277% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Signing Day Sports has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Science Applications International has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.21%. Signing Day Sports offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Science Applications International pays 20.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Signing Day Sports pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Science Applications International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Science Applications International quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than Signing Day Sports quarterly revenues of $55.4K. Science Applications International's net income of $98M is higher than Signing Day Sports's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Science Applications International's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.96x while Signing Day Sports's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Science Applications International is 0.82x versus 0.50x for Signing Day Sports. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WidePoint has a net margin of 5.33% compared to Science Applications International's net margin of -1.23%. Science Applications International's return on equity of 21.66% beat WidePoint's return on equity of -20.12%.

Science Applications International has a consensus price target of $126.28, signalling upside risk potential of 3.58%. On the other hand WidePoint has an analysts' consensus of $6.50 which suggests that it could grow by 22.64%. Given that WidePoint has higher upside potential than Science Applications International, analysts believe WidePoint is more attractive than Science Applications International.

Science Applications International has a beta of 0.547, which suggesting that the stock is 45.277% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WidePoint has a beta of 1.805, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.475%.

Science Applications International has a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.21%. WidePoint offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Science Applications International pays 20.72% of its earnings as a dividend. WidePoint pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Science Applications International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Science Applications International quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than WidePoint quarterly revenues of $34.6M. Science Applications International's net income of $98M is higher than WidePoint's net income of -$425.2K. Notably, Science Applications International's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.96x while WidePoint's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Science Applications International is 0.82x versus 0.35x for WidePoint. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.