ROKU Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Alphabet, Inc. has a net margin of 2.05% compared to Roku, Inc.'s net margin of 34.11%. Roku, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.09% beat Alphabet, Inc.'s return on equity of 35.82%.

Roku, Inc. has a consensus price target of $115.48, signalling upside risk potential of 4.34%. On the other hand Alphabet, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $329.41 which suggests that it could grow by 4.88%. Given that Alphabet, Inc. has higher upside potential than Roku, Inc., analysts believe Alphabet, Inc. is more attractive than Roku, Inc..

Roku, Inc. has a beta of 1.985, which suggesting that the stock is 98.48% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Alphabet, Inc. has a beta of 1.067, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.71%.

Roku, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Alphabet, Inc. offers a yield of 0.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Roku, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alphabet, Inc. pays out 7.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Alphabet, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Roku, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are smaller than Alphabet, Inc. quarterly revenues of $102.6B. Roku, Inc.'s net income of $24.8M is lower than Alphabet, Inc.'s net income of $35B. Notably, Roku, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Alphabet, Inc.'s PE ratio is 30.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Roku, Inc. is 3.61x versus 9.99x for Alphabet, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Netflix, Inc. has a net margin of 2.05% compared to Roku, Inc.'s net margin of 21.88%. Roku, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.09% beat Netflix, Inc.'s return on equity of 42.61%.

Roku, Inc. has a consensus price target of $115.48, signalling upside risk potential of 4.34%. On the other hand Netflix, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $126.19 which suggests that it could grow by 34.76%. Given that Netflix, Inc. has higher upside potential than Roku, Inc., analysts believe Netflix, Inc. is more attractive than Roku, Inc..

Roku, Inc. has a beta of 1.985, which suggesting that the stock is 98.48% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Netflix, Inc. has a beta of 1.707, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.706%.

Roku, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Netflix, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Roku, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Netflix, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Roku, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are smaller than Netflix, Inc. quarterly revenues of $11.6B. Roku, Inc.'s net income of $24.8M is lower than Netflix, Inc.'s net income of $2.5B. Notably, Roku, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Netflix, Inc.'s PE ratio is 39.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Roku, Inc. is 3.61x versus 9.42x for Netflix, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Roblox Corp. has a net margin of 2.05% compared to Roku, Inc.'s net margin of -18.93%. Roku, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.09% beat Roblox Corp.'s return on equity of -345.2%.

Roku, Inc. has a consensus price target of $115.48, signalling upside risk potential of 4.34%. On the other hand Roblox Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $140.64 which suggests that it could grow by 71.76%. Given that Roblox Corp. has higher upside potential than Roku, Inc., analysts believe Roblox Corp. is more attractive than Roku, Inc..

Roku, Inc. has a beta of 1.985, which suggesting that the stock is 98.48% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Roblox Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Roku, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Roblox Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Roku, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Roblox Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Roku, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are smaller than Roblox Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Roku, Inc.'s net income of $24.8M is higher than Roblox Corp.'s net income of -$257.4M. Notably, Roku, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Roblox Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Roku, Inc. is 3.61x versus 12.45x for Roblox Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SiriusXM Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 2.05% compared to Roku, Inc.'s net margin of 13.76%. Roku, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.09% beat SiriusXM Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.86%.

Roku, Inc. has a consensus price target of $115.48, signalling upside risk potential of 4.34%. On the other hand SiriusXM Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $24.00 which suggests that it could grow by 16.11%. Given that SiriusXM Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Roku, Inc., analysts believe SiriusXM Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Roku, Inc..

Roku, Inc. has a beta of 1.985, which suggesting that the stock is 98.48% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SiriusXM Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.920, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.984%.

Roku, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SiriusXM Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 5.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Roku, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SiriusXM Holdings, Inc. pays out 6.89% of its earnings as a dividend. SiriusXM Holdings, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Roku, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are smaller than SiriusXM Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Roku, Inc.'s net income of $24.8M is lower than SiriusXM Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $297M. Notably, Roku, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SiriusXM Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 7.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Roku, Inc. is 3.61x versus 0.86x for SiriusXM Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.