ROKU Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Walt Disney has a net margin of -2.96% compared to Roku's net margin of 10.34%. Roku's return on equity of -5.38% beat The Walt Disney's return on equity of 5.33%.

Roku has a consensus price target of $103.63, signalling upside risk potential of 26.8%. On the other hand The Walt Disney has an analysts' consensus of $126.30 which suggests that it could grow by 24.3%. Given that Roku has higher upside potential than The Walt Disney, analysts believe Roku is more attractive than The Walt Disney.

Roku has a beta of 2.117, which suggesting that the stock is 111.659% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Walt Disney has a beta of 1.408, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.799%.

Roku has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Walt Disney offers a yield of 0.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Roku pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Walt Disney pays out 27.47% of its earnings as a dividend. The Walt Disney's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Roku quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are smaller than The Walt Disney quarterly revenues of $24.7B. Roku's net income of -$35.5M is lower than The Walt Disney's net income of $2.6B. Notably, Roku's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while The Walt Disney's PE ratio is 33.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Roku is 2.87x versus 2.00x for The Walt Disney. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Trump Media & Technology Group has a net margin of -2.96% compared to Roku's net margin of -3762.99%. Roku's return on equity of -5.38% beat Trump Media & Technology Group's return on equity of -90.48%.

Roku has a consensus price target of $103.63, signalling upside risk potential of 26.8%. On the other hand Trump Media & Technology Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Roku has higher upside potential than Trump Media & Technology Group, analysts believe Roku is more attractive than Trump Media & Technology Group.

Roku has a beta of 2.117, which suggesting that the stock is 111.659% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Trump Media & Technology Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Roku has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Trump Media & Technology Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Roku pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Trump Media & Technology Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Roku quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Trump Media & Technology Group quarterly revenues of $1M. Roku's net income of -$35.5M is higher than Trump Media & Technology Group's net income of -$37.6M. Notably, Roku's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Trump Media & Technology Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Roku is 2.87x versus 1,071.19x for Trump Media & Technology Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Netflix has a net margin of -2.96% compared to Roku's net margin of 18.24%. Roku's return on equity of -5.38% beat Netflix's return on equity of 39.06%.

Roku has a consensus price target of $103.63, signalling upside risk potential of 26.8%. On the other hand Netflix has an analysts' consensus of $1,071.74 which suggests that it could grow by 7.47%. Given that Roku has higher upside potential than Netflix, analysts believe Roku is more attractive than Netflix.

Roku has a beta of 2.117, which suggesting that the stock is 111.659% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Netflix has a beta of 1.377, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.663%.

Roku has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Netflix offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Roku pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Netflix pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Roku quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are smaller than Netflix quarterly revenues of $10.2B. Roku's net income of -$35.5M is lower than Netflix's net income of $1.9B. Notably, Roku's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Netflix's PE ratio is 50.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Roku is 2.87x versus 11.23x for Netflix. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sirius XM Holdings has a net margin of -2.96% compared to Roku's net margin of 13.12%. Roku's return on equity of -5.38% beat Sirius XM Holdings's return on equity of -25.99%.

Roku has a consensus price target of $103.63, signalling upside risk potential of 26.8%. On the other hand Sirius XM Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $24.08 which suggests that it could fall by -0.67%. Given that Roku has higher upside potential than Sirius XM Holdings, analysts believe Roku is more attractive than Sirius XM Holdings.

Roku has a beta of 2.117, which suggesting that the stock is 111.659% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sirius XM Holdings has a beta of 1.056, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.648%.

Roku has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sirius XM Holdings offers a yield of 4.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Roku pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sirius XM Holdings pays out -8.59% of its earnings as a dividend.

Roku quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are smaller than Sirius XM Holdings quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Roku's net income of -$35.5M is lower than Sirius XM Holdings's net income of $287M. Notably, Roku's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sirius XM Holdings's PE ratio is 10.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Roku is 2.87x versus 1.01x for Sirius XM Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.