Will UnitedHealth Stock Recover?
Shares of embattled health insurance giant UnitedHealth (NYSE:UNH) plummeted by…
Buy
80
ROE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$37.11
Seasonality move
:
-0.21%
Day range:
$37.43 - $37.77
52-week range:
$25.42 - $37.77
Dividend yield:
0.9%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
18.1K
Avg. volume:
46.6K
1-year change:
19.33%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ROE
Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ACVF
American Conservative Values ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CHGX
Stance Sustainable Beta ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HDUS
Hartford Disciplined US Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MMTM
State Street SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum TILT ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
OALC
OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ROE
Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF
|
$37.76 | -- | -- | -- | $0.09 | 0.9% | -- |
|
ACVF
American Conservative Values ETF
|
$50.41 | -- | -- | -- | $0.07 | 0.57% | -- |
|
CHGX
Stance Sustainable Beta ETF
|
$25.08 | -- | -- | -- | $0.29 | 1.15% | -- |
|
HDUS
Hartford Disciplined US Equity ETF
|
$66.74 | -- | -- | -- | $0.35 | 1.42% | -- |
|
MMTM
State Street SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum TILT ETF
|
$299.41 | -- | -- | -- | $0.60 | 0.84% | -- |
|
OALC
OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF
|
$36.18 | -- | -- | -- | $0.22 | 0.6% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ROE
Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF
|
-- | 0.895 | -- | -- |
|
ACVF
American Conservative Values ETF
|
-- | 0.773 | -- | -- |
|
CHGX
Stance Sustainable Beta ETF
|
-- | 1.455 | -- | -- |
|
HDUS
Hartford Disciplined US Equity ETF
|
-- | 0.955 | -- | -- |
|
MMTM
State Street SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum TILT ETF
|
-- | 1.143 | -- | -- |
|
OALC
OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF
|
-- | 1.008 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ROE
Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ACVF
American Conservative Values ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CHGX
Stance Sustainable Beta ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HDUS
Hartford Disciplined US Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MMTM
State Street SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum TILT ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
OALC
OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns ROE or ACVF?
American Conservative Values ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF's net margin of --. Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF's return on equity of -- beat American Conservative Values ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ROEAstoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF-- -- -- ACVFAmerican Conservative Values ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ROE or ACVF?
Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand American Conservative Values ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF has higher upside potential than American Conservative Values ETF, analysts believe Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF is more attractive than American Conservative Values ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ROEAstoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF0 0 0 ACVFAmerican Conservative Values ETF0 0 0 -
Is ROE or ACVF More Risky?
Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison American Conservative Values ETF has a beta of 0.966, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.37%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ROE or ACVF?
Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.9%. American Conservative Values ETF offers a yield of 0.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. American Conservative Values ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ROE or ACVF?
Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than American Conservative Values ETF quarterly revenues of --. Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF's net income of -- is lower than American Conservative Values ETF's net income of --. Notably, Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while American Conservative Values ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF is -- versus -- for American Conservative Values ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ROEAstoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF-- -- -- -- ACVFAmerican Conservative Values ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ROE or CHGX?
Stance Sustainable Beta ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF's net margin of --. Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF's return on equity of -- beat Stance Sustainable Beta ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ROEAstoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF-- -- -- CHGXStance Sustainable Beta ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ROE or CHGX?
Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Stance Sustainable Beta ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF has higher upside potential than Stance Sustainable Beta ETF, analysts believe Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF is more attractive than Stance Sustainable Beta ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ROEAstoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF0 0 0 CHGXStance Sustainable Beta ETF0 0 0 -
Is ROE or CHGX More Risky?
Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Stance Sustainable Beta ETF has a beta of 0.565, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.49%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ROE or CHGX?
Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.9%. Stance Sustainable Beta ETF offers a yield of 1.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Stance Sustainable Beta ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ROE or CHGX?
Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Stance Sustainable Beta ETF quarterly revenues of --. Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF's net income of -- is lower than Stance Sustainable Beta ETF's net income of --. Notably, Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Stance Sustainable Beta ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF is -- versus -- for Stance Sustainable Beta ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ROEAstoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF-- -- -- -- CHGXStance Sustainable Beta ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ROE or HDUS?
Hartford Disciplined US Equity ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF's net margin of --. Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF's return on equity of -- beat Hartford Disciplined US Equity ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ROEAstoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF-- -- -- HDUSHartford Disciplined US Equity ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ROE or HDUS?
Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Hartford Disciplined US Equity ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF has higher upside potential than Hartford Disciplined US Equity ETF, analysts believe Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF is more attractive than Hartford Disciplined US Equity ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ROEAstoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF0 0 0 HDUSHartford Disciplined US Equity ETF0 0 0 -
Is ROE or HDUS More Risky?
Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hartford Disciplined US Equity ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ROE or HDUS?
Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.9%. Hartford Disciplined US Equity ETF offers a yield of 1.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hartford Disciplined US Equity ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ROE or HDUS?
Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Hartford Disciplined US Equity ETF quarterly revenues of --. Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF's net income of -- is lower than Hartford Disciplined US Equity ETF's net income of --. Notably, Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hartford Disciplined US Equity ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF is -- versus -- for Hartford Disciplined US Equity ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ROEAstoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF-- -- -- -- HDUSHartford Disciplined US Equity ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ROE or MMTM?
State Street SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum TILT ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF's net margin of --. Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF's return on equity of -- beat State Street SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum TILT ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ROEAstoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF-- -- -- MMTMState Street SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum TILT ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ROE or MMTM?
Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand State Street SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum TILT ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF has higher upside potential than State Street SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum TILT ETF, analysts believe Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF is more attractive than State Street SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum TILT ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ROEAstoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF0 0 0 MMTMState Street SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum TILT ETF0 0 0 -
Is ROE or MMTM More Risky?
Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison State Street SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum TILT ETF has a beta of 1.002, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.15000000000001%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ROE or MMTM?
Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.9%. State Street SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum TILT ETF offers a yield of 0.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share. Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. State Street SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum TILT ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ROE or MMTM?
Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than State Street SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum TILT ETF quarterly revenues of --. Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF's net income of -- is lower than State Street SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum TILT ETF's net income of --. Notably, Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while State Street SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum TILT ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF is -- versus -- for State Street SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum TILT ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ROEAstoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF-- -- -- -- MMTMState Street SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum TILT ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ROE or OALC?
OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF's net margin of --. Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF's return on equity of -- beat OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ROEAstoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF-- -- -- OALCOneAscent Large Cap Core ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ROE or OALC?
Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF has higher upside potential than OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF, analysts believe Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF is more attractive than OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ROEAstoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF0 0 0 OALCOneAscent Large Cap Core ETF0 0 0 -
Is ROE or OALC More Risky?
Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ROE or OALC?
Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.9%. OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF offers a yield of 0.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ROE or OALC?
Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF quarterly revenues of --. Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF's net income of -- is lower than OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF's net income of --. Notably, Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF is -- versus -- for OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ROEAstoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF-- -- -- -- OALCOneAscent Large Cap Core ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Lumentum The Best Laser Stock to Buy?
Though certainly less well-known than the huge tech businesses that…
Is Planet Fitness Stock Undervalued?
Planet Fitness (NYSE:PLNT) has had a difficult 12 months, retreating…
Stock Ideas
Buy
56
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Buy
58
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Sell
40
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 29x
Alerts
Buy
91
TDC alert for Feb 12
Teradata Corp. [TDC] is down 11.64% over the past day.
Buy
67
DIOD alert for Feb 12
Diodes, Inc. [DIOD] is down 7.63% over the past day.
Buy
77
VRT alert for Feb 12
Vertiv Holdings Co. [VRT] is down 4.79% over the past day.
