Is Uber Finally on the Path to Consistent Profitability?
After posting massive losses quarter after quarter for years, Uber…
Sell
30
ROE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$27.55
Seasonality move
:
0.04%
Day range:
$28.02 - $28.33
52-week range:
$25.42 - $32.41
Dividend yield:
1.08%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
19.2K
Avg. volume:
44.1K
1-year change:
1.7%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ROE
Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MFUS
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor US Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QDEF
FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ROUS
Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
VLU
SPDR S&P 1500 Value TILT ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ROE
Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF
|
$28.05 | -- | -- | -- | $0.04 | 1.08% | -- |
|
MFUS
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor US Equity ETF
|
$47.69 | -- | -- | -- | $0.23 | 1.66% | -- |
|
QDEF
FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund
|
$67.18 | -- | -- | -- | $0.21 | 1.98% | -- |
|
ROUS
Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF
|
$48.44 | -- | -- | -- | $0.19 | 1.77% | -- |
|
VLU
SPDR S&P 1500 Value TILT ETF
|
$173.12 | -- | -- | -- | $0.91 | 2.2% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ROE
Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF
|
-- | 1.086 | -- | -- |
|
MFUS
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor US Equity ETF
|
-- | 0.959 | -- | -- |
|
QDEF
FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund
|
-- | 0.847 | -- | -- |
|
ROUS
Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF
|
-- | 0.931 | -- | -- |
|
VLU
SPDR S&P 1500 Value TILT ETF
|
-- | 0.914 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ROE
Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MFUS
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor US Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QDEF
FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ROUS
Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
VLU
SPDR S&P 1500 Value TILT ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns ROE or MFUS?
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor US Equity ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF's net margin of --. Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF's return on equity of -- beat PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor US Equity ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ROEAstoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF-- -- -- MFUSPIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor US Equity ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ROE or MFUS?
Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor US Equity ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF has higher upside potential than PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor US Equity ETF, analysts believe Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF is more attractive than PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor US Equity ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ROEAstoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF0 0 0 MFUSPIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor US Equity ETF0 0 0 -
Is ROE or MFUS More Risky?
Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor US Equity ETF has a beta of 0.894, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.622%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ROE or MFUS?
Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.08%. PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor US Equity ETF offers a yield of 1.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor US Equity ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ROE or MFUS?
Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor US Equity ETF quarterly revenues of --. Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF's net income of -- is lower than PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor US Equity ETF's net income of --. Notably, Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor US Equity ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF is -- versus -- for PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor US Equity ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ROEAstoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF-- -- -- -- MFUSPIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor US Equity ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ROE or QDEF?
FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund has a net margin of -- compared to Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF's net margin of --. Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF's return on equity of -- beat FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ROEAstoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF-- -- -- QDEFFlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ROE or QDEF?
Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF has higher upside potential than FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund, analysts believe Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF is more attractive than FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ROEAstoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF0 0 0 QDEFFlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund0 0 0 -
Is ROE or QDEF More Risky?
Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund has a beta of 0.850, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.998%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ROE or QDEF?
Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.08%. FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund offers a yield of 1.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ROE or QDEF?
Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund quarterly revenues of --. Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF's net income of -- is lower than FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund's net income of --. Notably, Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF is -- versus -- for FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ROEAstoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF-- -- -- -- QDEFFlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ROE or ROUS?
Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF's net margin of --. Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF's return on equity of -- beat Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ROEAstoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF-- -- -- ROUSHartford Multifactor US Equity ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ROE or ROUS?
Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF has higher upside potential than Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF, analysts believe Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF is more attractive than Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ROEAstoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF0 0 0 ROUSHartford Multifactor US Equity ETF0 0 0 -
Is ROE or ROUS More Risky?
Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF has a beta of 0.851, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.927%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ROE or ROUS?
Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.08%. Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF offers a yield of 1.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ROE or ROUS?
Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF quarterly revenues of --. Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF's net income of -- is lower than Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF's net income of --. Notably, Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF is -- versus -- for Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ROEAstoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF-- -- -- -- ROUSHartford Multifactor US Equity ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ROE or VLU?
SPDR S&P 1500 Value TILT ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF's net margin of --. Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF's return on equity of -- beat SPDR S&P 1500 Value TILT ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ROEAstoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF-- -- -- VLUSPDR S&P 1500 Value TILT ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ROE or VLU?
Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SPDR S&P 1500 Value TILT ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF has higher upside potential than SPDR S&P 1500 Value TILT ETF, analysts believe Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF is more attractive than SPDR S&P 1500 Value TILT ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ROEAstoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF0 0 0 VLUSPDR S&P 1500 Value TILT ETF0 0 0 -
Is ROE or VLU More Risky?
Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SPDR S&P 1500 Value TILT ETF has a beta of 0.958, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.183%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ROE or VLU?
Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.08%. SPDR S&P 1500 Value TILT ETF offers a yield of 2.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share. Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SPDR S&P 1500 Value TILT ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ROE or VLU?
Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SPDR S&P 1500 Value TILT ETF quarterly revenues of --. Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF's net income of -- is lower than SPDR S&P 1500 Value TILT ETF's net income of --. Notably, Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SPDR S&P 1500 Value TILT ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF is -- versus -- for SPDR S&P 1500 Value TILT ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ROEAstoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF-- -- -- -- VLUSPDR S&P 1500 Value TILT ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
How High Will MSTY Go By 2030?
YieldMax’s MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY) is a high-yield…
Will NVIDIA Stock Bounce Back?
After the wild market moves during February and March, investors…
Stock Ideas
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Buy
53
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.7T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Alerts
Sell
45
DSDVY alert for Apr 16
DSV AS [DSDVY] is down 2.69% over the past day.
Buy
76
PDEX alert for Apr 16
Pro-Dex [PDEX] is down 4.66% over the past day.
Buy
82
HAGHY alert for Apr 16
Hensoldt AG [HAGHY] is down 0.02% over the past day.
