RMBS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Entegris has a net margin of 36.18% compared to Rambus's net margin of 8.14%. Rambus's return on equity of 19.4% beat Entegris's return on equity of 8.64%.

Rambus has a consensus price target of $74.71, signalling upside risk potential of 46.44%. On the other hand Entegris has an analysts' consensus of $104.97 which suggests that it could grow by 37.47%. Given that Rambus has higher upside potential than Entegris, analysts believe Rambus is more attractive than Entegris.

Rambus has a beta of 1.245, which suggesting that the stock is 24.495% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Entegris has a beta of 1.333, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.291%.

Rambus has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Entegris offers a yield of 0.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Rambus pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Entegris pays out 20.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Entegris's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rambus quarterly revenues are $166.7M, which are smaller than Entegris quarterly revenues of $773.2M. Rambus's net income of $60.3M is lower than Entegris's net income of $62.9M. Notably, Rambus's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.57x while Entegris's PE ratio is 37.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rambus is 9.15x versus 3.58x for Entegris. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KLA has a net margin of 36.18% compared to Rambus's net margin of 35.53%. Rambus's return on equity of 19.4% beat KLA's return on equity of 104.91%.

Rambus has a consensus price target of $74.71, signalling upside risk potential of 46.44%. On the other hand KLA has an analysts' consensus of $785.09 which suggests that it could grow by 11.96%. Given that Rambus has higher upside potential than KLA, analysts believe Rambus is more attractive than KLA.

Rambus has a beta of 1.245, which suggesting that the stock is 24.495% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KLA has a beta of 1.405, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.453%.

Rambus has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. KLA offers a yield of 0.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.70 per share. Rambus pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KLA pays out 27.99% of its earnings as a dividend. KLA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rambus quarterly revenues are $166.7M, which are smaller than KLA quarterly revenues of $3.1B. Rambus's net income of $60.3M is lower than KLA's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Rambus's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.57x while KLA's PE ratio is 25.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rambus is 9.15x versus 8.16x for KLA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lattice Semiconductor has a net margin of 36.18% compared to Rambus's net margin of 4.18%. Rambus's return on equity of 19.4% beat Lattice Semiconductor's return on equity of 7.33%.

Rambus has a consensus price target of $74.71, signalling upside risk potential of 46.44%. On the other hand Lattice Semiconductor has an analysts' consensus of $62.88 which suggests that it could grow by 26.7%. Given that Rambus has higher upside potential than Lattice Semiconductor, analysts believe Rambus is more attractive than Lattice Semiconductor.

Rambus has a beta of 1.245, which suggesting that the stock is 24.495% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lattice Semiconductor has a beta of 1.601, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.065%.

Rambus has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lattice Semiconductor offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rambus pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lattice Semiconductor pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Rambus quarterly revenues are $166.7M, which are larger than Lattice Semiconductor quarterly revenues of $120.2M. Rambus's net income of $60.3M is higher than Lattice Semiconductor's net income of $5M. Notably, Rambus's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.57x while Lattice Semiconductor's PE ratio is 134.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rambus is 9.15x versus 14.04x for Lattice Semiconductor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ultra Clean Holdings has a net margin of 36.18% compared to Rambus's net margin of -0.96%. Rambus's return on equity of 19.4% beat Ultra Clean Holdings's return on equity of 3.06%.

Rambus has a consensus price target of $74.71, signalling upside risk potential of 46.44%. On the other hand Ultra Clean Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $30.75 which suggests that it could grow by 53.52%. Given that Ultra Clean Holdings has higher upside potential than Rambus, analysts believe Ultra Clean Holdings is more attractive than Rambus.

Rambus has a beta of 1.245, which suggesting that the stock is 24.495% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ultra Clean Holdings has a beta of 2.094, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 109.438%.

Rambus has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ultra Clean Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rambus pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ultra Clean Holdings pays out 2.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Ultra Clean Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rambus quarterly revenues are $166.7M, which are smaller than Ultra Clean Holdings quarterly revenues of $518.6M. Rambus's net income of $60.3M is higher than Ultra Clean Holdings's net income of -$5M. Notably, Rambus's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.57x while Ultra Clean Holdings's PE ratio is 32.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rambus is 9.15x versus 0.42x for Ultra Clean Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.