REG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Federal Realty Investment Trust has a net margin of 28.77% compared to Regency Centers's net margin of 20.63%. Regency Centers's return on equity of 5.74% beat Federal Realty Investment Trust's return on equity of 9.07%.

Regency Centers has a consensus price target of $79.15, signalling upside risk potential of 14.14%. On the other hand Federal Realty Investment Trust has an analysts' consensus of $111.50 which suggests that it could grow by 17.85%. Given that Federal Realty Investment Trust has higher upside potential than Regency Centers, analysts believe Federal Realty Investment Trust is more attractive than Regency Centers.

Regency Centers has a beta of 1.000, which suggesting that the stock is 0.0059999999999949% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Federal Realty Investment Trust has a beta of 1.088, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.795%.

Regency Centers has a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.02%. Federal Realty Investment Trust offers a yield of 4.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.10 per share. Regency Centers pays 125.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Federal Realty Investment Trust pays out 125.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Regency Centers quarterly revenues are $380.9M, which are larger than Federal Realty Investment Trust quarterly revenues of $309.2M. Regency Centers's net income of $109.6M is higher than Federal Realty Investment Trust's net income of $63.8M. Notably, Regency Centers's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.68x while Federal Realty Investment Trust's PE ratio is 27.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Regency Centers is 8.58x versus 6.55x for Federal Realty Investment Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Host Hotels & Resorts has a net margin of 28.77% compared to Regency Centers's net margin of 15.56%. Regency Centers's return on equity of 5.74% beat Host Hotels & Resorts's return on equity of 9.85%.

Regency Centers has a consensus price target of $79.15, signalling upside risk potential of 14.14%. On the other hand Host Hotels & Resorts has an analysts' consensus of $17.89 which suggests that it could grow by 7.89%. Given that Regency Centers has higher upside potential than Host Hotels & Resorts, analysts believe Regency Centers is more attractive than Host Hotels & Resorts.

Regency Centers has a beta of 1.000, which suggesting that the stock is 0.0059999999999949% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Host Hotels & Resorts has a beta of 1.315, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.519%.

Regency Centers has a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.02%. Host Hotels & Resorts offers a yield of 5.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Regency Centers pays 125.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Host Hotels & Resorts pays out 105.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Regency Centers quarterly revenues are $380.9M, which are smaller than Host Hotels & Resorts quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Regency Centers's net income of $109.6M is lower than Host Hotels & Resorts's net income of $248M. Notably, Regency Centers's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.68x while Host Hotels & Resorts's PE ratio is 17.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Regency Centers is 8.58x versus 2.00x for Host Hotels & Resorts. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Prologis has a net margin of 28.77% compared to Regency Centers's net margin of 27.71%. Regency Centers's return on equity of 5.74% beat Prologis's return on equity of 6.45%.

Regency Centers has a consensus price target of $79.15, signalling upside risk potential of 14.14%. On the other hand Prologis has an analysts' consensus of $118.20 which suggests that it could grow by 8.89%. Given that Regency Centers has higher upside potential than Prologis, analysts believe Regency Centers is more attractive than Prologis.

Regency Centers has a beta of 1.000, which suggesting that the stock is 0.0059999999999949% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Prologis has a beta of 1.232, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.179%.

Regency Centers has a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.02%. Prologis offers a yield of 3.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share. Regency Centers pays 125.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Prologis pays out 95.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Prologis's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Regency Centers's is not.

Regency Centers quarterly revenues are $380.9M, which are smaller than Prologis quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Regency Centers's net income of $109.6M is lower than Prologis's net income of $593M. Notably, Regency Centers's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.68x while Prologis's PE ratio is 27.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Regency Centers is 8.58x versus 12.34x for Prologis. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Simon Property Group has a net margin of 28.77% compared to Regency Centers's net margin of 28.14%. Regency Centers's return on equity of 5.74% beat Simon Property Group's return on equity of 58.53%.

Regency Centers has a consensus price target of $79.15, signalling upside risk potential of 14.14%. On the other hand Simon Property Group has an analysts' consensus of $181.21 which suggests that it could grow by 10.64%. Given that Regency Centers has higher upside potential than Simon Property Group, analysts believe Regency Centers is more attractive than Simon Property Group.

Regency Centers has a beta of 1.000, which suggesting that the stock is 0.0059999999999949% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Simon Property Group has a beta of 1.441, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.08%.

Regency Centers has a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.02%. Simon Property Group offers a yield of 5.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.10 per share. Regency Centers pays 125.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Simon Property Group pays out 128.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Regency Centers quarterly revenues are $380.9M, which are smaller than Simon Property Group quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Regency Centers's net income of $109.6M is lower than Simon Property Group's net income of $414.5M. Notably, Regency Centers's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.68x while Simon Property Group's PE ratio is 26.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Regency Centers is 8.58x versus 8.89x for Simon Property Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.