REG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Federal Realty Investment Trust has a net margin of 29.06% compared to Regency Centers Corp.'s net margin of 19.92%. Regency Centers Corp.'s return on equity of 6.08% beat Federal Realty Investment Trust's return on equity of 10.4%.

Regency Centers Corp. has a consensus price target of $79.70, signalling upside risk potential of 13.96%. On the other hand Federal Realty Investment Trust has an analysts' consensus of $110.18 which suggests that it could grow by 13.44%. Given that Regency Centers Corp. has higher upside potential than Federal Realty Investment Trust, analysts believe Regency Centers Corp. is more attractive than Federal Realty Investment Trust.

Regency Centers Corp. has a beta of 0.931, which suggesting that the stock is 6.901% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Federal Realty Investment Trust has a beta of 1.006, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.603%.

Regency Centers Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.03%. Federal Realty Investment Trust offers a yield of 4.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share. Regency Centers Corp. pays 128.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Federal Realty Investment Trust pays out 128.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Regency Centers Corp. quarterly revenues are $387.5M, which are larger than Federal Realty Investment Trust quarterly revenues of $322.3M. Regency Centers Corp.'s net income of $112.6M is higher than Federal Realty Investment Trust's net income of $64.2M. Notably, Regency Centers Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 31.99x while Federal Realty Investment Trust's PE ratio is 24.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Regency Centers Corp. is 8.36x versus 6.64x for Federal Realty Investment Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. has a net margin of 29.06% compared to Regency Centers Corp.'s net margin of 12.25%. Regency Centers Corp.'s return on equity of 6.08% beat Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.99%.

Regency Centers Corp. has a consensus price target of $79.70, signalling upside risk potential of 13.96%. On the other hand Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $19.68 which suggests that it could grow by 11.44%. Given that Regency Centers Corp. has higher upside potential than Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc., analysts believe Regency Centers Corp. is more attractive than Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc..

Regency Centers Corp. has a beta of 0.931, which suggesting that the stock is 6.901% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. has a beta of 1.185, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.526%.

Regency Centers Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.03%. Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. offers a yield of 5.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Regency Centers Corp. pays 128.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. pays out 80.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Regency Centers Corp.'s is not.

Regency Centers Corp. quarterly revenues are $387.5M, which are smaller than Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Regency Centers Corp.'s net income of $112.6M is lower than Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.'s net income of $163M. Notably, Regency Centers Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 31.99x while Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.'s PE ratio is 16.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Regency Centers Corp. is 8.36x versus 2.07x for Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Prologis, Inc. has a net margin of 29.06% compared to Regency Centers Corp.'s net margin of 37.1%. Regency Centers Corp.'s return on equity of 6.08% beat Prologis, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.93%.

Regency Centers Corp. has a consensus price target of $79.70, signalling upside risk potential of 13.96%. On the other hand Prologis, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $130.30 which suggests that it could grow by 0.86%. Given that Regency Centers Corp. has higher upside potential than Prologis, Inc., analysts believe Regency Centers Corp. is more attractive than Prologis, Inc..

Regency Centers Corp. has a beta of 0.931, which suggesting that the stock is 6.901% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Prologis, Inc. has a beta of 1.398, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.751%.

Regency Centers Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.03%. Prologis, Inc. offers a yield of 3.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share. Regency Centers Corp. pays 128.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Prologis, Inc. pays out 95.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Prologis, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Regency Centers Corp.'s is not.

Regency Centers Corp. quarterly revenues are $387.5M, which are smaller than Prologis, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Regency Centers Corp.'s net income of $112.6M is lower than Prologis, Inc.'s net income of $821.3M. Notably, Regency Centers Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 31.99x while Prologis, Inc.'s PE ratio is 37.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Regency Centers Corp. is 8.36x versus 14.13x for Prologis, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Simon Property Group, Inc. has a net margin of 29.06% compared to Regency Centers Corp.'s net margin of 43.88%. Regency Centers Corp.'s return on equity of 6.08% beat Simon Property Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 81.03%.

Regency Centers Corp. has a consensus price target of $79.70, signalling upside risk potential of 13.96%. On the other hand Simon Property Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $193.45 which suggests that it could grow by 6.12%. Given that Regency Centers Corp. has higher upside potential than Simon Property Group, Inc., analysts believe Regency Centers Corp. is more attractive than Simon Property Group, Inc..

Regency Centers Corp. has a beta of 0.931, which suggesting that the stock is 6.901% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Simon Property Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.376, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.642%.

Regency Centers Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.03%. Simon Property Group, Inc. offers a yield of 4.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.15 per share. Regency Centers Corp. pays 128.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Simon Property Group, Inc. pays out 107.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Regency Centers Corp. quarterly revenues are $387.5M, which are smaller than Simon Property Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Regency Centers Corp.'s net income of $112.6M is lower than Simon Property Group, Inc.'s net income of $702.7M. Notably, Regency Centers Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 31.99x while Simon Property Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 25.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Regency Centers Corp. is 8.36x versus 9.67x for Simon Property Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.