RAVE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Flanigan'S Enterprises has a net margin of 21.16% compared to Rave Restaurant Group's net margin of 0.11%. Rave Restaurant Group's return on equity of 21.27% beat Flanigan'S Enterprises's return on equity of 4.38%.

Rave Restaurant Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 12.11%. On the other hand Flanigan'S Enterprises has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Rave Restaurant Group has higher upside potential than Flanigan'S Enterprises, analysts believe Rave Restaurant Group is more attractive than Flanigan'S Enterprises.

Rave Restaurant Group has a beta of 0.135, which suggesting that the stock is 86.49% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flanigan'S Enterprises has a beta of 0.346, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.418%.

Rave Restaurant Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Flanigan'S Enterprises offers a yield of 2.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Rave Restaurant Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Flanigan'S Enterprises pays out 27.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Flanigan'S Enterprises's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rave Restaurant Group quarterly revenues are $2.9M, which are smaller than Flanigan'S Enterprises quarterly revenues of $50.3M. Rave Restaurant Group's net income of $607K is higher than Flanigan'S Enterprises's net income of $55K. Notably, Rave Restaurant Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.39x while Flanigan'S Enterprises's PE ratio is 13.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rave Restaurant Group is 2.69x versus 0.23x for Flanigan'S Enterprises. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

FAT Brands has a net margin of 21.16% compared to Rave Restaurant Group's net margin of -46.41%. Rave Restaurant Group's return on equity of 21.27% beat FAT Brands's return on equity of --.

Rave Restaurant Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 12.11%. On the other hand FAT Brands has an analysts' consensus of $13.50 which suggests that it could grow by 442.17%. Given that FAT Brands has higher upside potential than Rave Restaurant Group, analysts believe FAT Brands is more attractive than Rave Restaurant Group.

Rave Restaurant Group has a beta of 0.135, which suggesting that the stock is 86.49% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FAT Brands has a beta of 1.616, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.639%.

Rave Restaurant Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. FAT Brands offers a yield of 22.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Rave Restaurant Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. FAT Brands pays out -9.13% of its earnings as a dividend.

Rave Restaurant Group quarterly revenues are $2.9M, which are smaller than FAT Brands quarterly revenues of $145.3M. Rave Restaurant Group's net income of $607K is higher than FAT Brands's net income of -$67.4M. Notably, Rave Restaurant Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.39x while FAT Brands's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rave Restaurant Group is 2.69x versus 0.07x for FAT Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Notes Live Holding has a net margin of 21.16% compared to Rave Restaurant Group's net margin of --. Rave Restaurant Group's return on equity of 21.27% beat Notes Live Holding's return on equity of --.

Rave Restaurant Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 12.11%. On the other hand Notes Live Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Rave Restaurant Group has higher upside potential than Notes Live Holding, analysts believe Rave Restaurant Group is more attractive than Notes Live Holding.

Rave Restaurant Group has a beta of 0.135, which suggesting that the stock is 86.49% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Notes Live Holding has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Rave Restaurant Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Notes Live Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rave Restaurant Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Notes Live Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Rave Restaurant Group quarterly revenues are $2.9M, which are larger than Notes Live Holding quarterly revenues of --. Rave Restaurant Group's net income of $607K is higher than Notes Live Holding's net income of --. Notably, Rave Restaurant Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.39x while Notes Live Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rave Restaurant Group is 2.69x versus -- for Notes Live Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Yum Brands has a net margin of 21.16% compared to Rave Restaurant Group's net margin of 17.91%. Rave Restaurant Group's return on equity of 21.27% beat Yum Brands's return on equity of --.

Rave Restaurant Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 12.11%. On the other hand Yum Brands has an analysts' consensus of $155.83 which suggests that it could grow by 7.47%. Given that Rave Restaurant Group has higher upside potential than Yum Brands, analysts believe Rave Restaurant Group is more attractive than Yum Brands.

Rave Restaurant Group has a beta of 0.135, which suggesting that the stock is 86.49% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Yum Brands has a beta of 0.895, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.487%.

Rave Restaurant Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Yum Brands offers a yield of 1.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share. Rave Restaurant Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Yum Brands pays out 50.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Yum Brands's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rave Restaurant Group quarterly revenues are $2.9M, which are smaller than Yum Brands quarterly revenues of $2.4B. Rave Restaurant Group's net income of $607K is lower than Yum Brands's net income of $423M. Notably, Rave Restaurant Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.39x while Yum Brands's PE ratio is 27.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rave Restaurant Group is 2.69x versus 5.48x for Yum Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.