Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Sell Broadcom Stock?
In Q3, legendary macro investor Stan Druckenmiller sold his entire…
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
QTTB
Q32 Bio, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -100% | -- | $15.00 |
|
AKBA
Akebia Therapeutics, Inc.
|
$56.2M | $0.02 | 20.82% | -95.21% | $5.40 |
|
BLTE
Belite Bio, Inc.
|
-- | -$0.51 | -- | -58.83% | $184.33 |
|
CVM
CEL-SCI Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $42.50 |
|
IVF
INVO Fertility, Inc.
|
$1.9M | -- | -8.8% | -- | -- |
|
KALA
Kala Bio, Inc.
|
-- | -$1.10 | -- | -43.13% | $1.50 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
QTTB
Q32 Bio, Inc.
|
$3.37 | $15.00 | $41.5M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
AKBA
Akebia Therapeutics, Inc.
|
$1.51 | $5.40 | $400.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.69x |
|
BLTE
Belite Bio, Inc.
|
$159.42 | $184.33 | $6B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
CVM
CEL-SCI Corp.
|
$6.00 | $42.50 | $18.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
IVF
INVO Fertility, Inc.
|
$1.01 | -- | $15.3M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.02x |
|
KALA
Kala Bio, Inc.
|
$0.62 | $1.50 | $5.1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 7.18x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
QTTB
Q32 Bio, Inc.
|
-1196.42% | 2.670 | 69.88% | 4.41x |
|
AKBA
Akebia Therapeutics, Inc.
|
83.68% | 1.509 | 29.46% | 1.76x |
|
BLTE
Belite Bio, Inc.
|
0.19% | -0.792 | 0.02% | 34.17x |
|
CVM
CEL-SCI Corp.
|
37.03% | 0.660 | 33.61% | 2.14x |
|
IVF
INVO Fertility, Inc.
|
41.99% | 0.410 | 10.12% | 0.07x |
|
KALA
Kala Bio, Inc.
|
140.72% | 2.141 | 263.3% | 0.65x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
QTTB
Q32 Bio, Inc.
|
-$91K | -$7.6M | -256.32% | -634.27% | -- | -$4.2M |
|
AKBA
Akebia Therapeutics, Inc.
|
$49.1M | $4.4M | -7.86% | -- | 7.57% | $28M |
|
BLTE
Belite Bio, Inc.
|
-$347K | -$23M | -37.09% | -37.13% | -- | -- |
|
CVM
CEL-SCI Corp.
|
-$960.8K | -$6M | -117.93% | -230.36% | -- | -$4.7M |
|
IVF
INVO Fertility, Inc.
|
$492.6K | -$1.6M | -188.23% | -471.28% | -93.08% | -$1.8M |
|
KALA
Kala Bio, Inc.
|
-$128K | -$10.7M | -102.67% | -1375.54% | -- | -$10.9M |
Akebia Therapeutics, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Q32 Bio, Inc.'s net margin of 0.92%. Q32 Bio, Inc.'s return on equity of -634.27% beat Akebia Therapeutics, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
QTTB
Q32 Bio, Inc.
|
-- | -$0.60 | -$1.4M |
|
AKBA
Akebia Therapeutics, Inc.
|
83.49% | $0.00 | $254.9M |
Q32 Bio, Inc. has a consensus price target of $15.00, signalling upside risk potential of 345.1%. On the other hand Akebia Therapeutics, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $5.40 which suggests that it could grow by 257.62%. Given that Q32 Bio, Inc. has higher upside potential than Akebia Therapeutics, Inc., analysts believe Q32 Bio, Inc. is more attractive than Akebia Therapeutics, Inc..
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
QTTB
Q32 Bio, Inc.
|
1 | 1 | 0 |
|
AKBA
Akebia Therapeutics, Inc.
|
4 | 0 | 0 |
Q32 Bio, Inc. has a beta of 0.134, which suggesting that the stock is 86.587% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Akebia Therapeutics, Inc. has a beta of 0.354, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.559%.
Q32 Bio, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Akebia Therapeutics, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Q32 Bio, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Akebia Therapeutics, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
Q32 Bio, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Akebia Therapeutics, Inc. quarterly revenues of $58.8M. Q32 Bio, Inc.'s net income of -$7.4M is lower than Akebia Therapeutics, Inc.'s net income of $540K. Notably, Q32 Bio, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Akebia Therapeutics, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Q32 Bio, Inc. is -- versus 1.69x for Akebia Therapeutics, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
QTTB
Q32 Bio, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -$7.4M |
|
AKBA
Akebia Therapeutics, Inc.
|
1.69x | -- | $58.8M | $540K |
Belite Bio, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Q32 Bio, Inc.'s net margin of --. Q32 Bio, Inc.'s return on equity of -634.27% beat Belite Bio, Inc.'s return on equity of -37.13%.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
QTTB
Q32 Bio, Inc.
|
-- | -$0.60 | -$1.4M |
|
BLTE
Belite Bio, Inc.
|
-- | -$0.65 | $274.6M |
Q32 Bio, Inc. has a consensus price target of $15.00, signalling upside risk potential of 345.1%. On the other hand Belite Bio, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $184.33 which suggests that it could grow by 15.63%. Given that Q32 Bio, Inc. has higher upside potential than Belite Bio, Inc., analysts believe Q32 Bio, Inc. is more attractive than Belite Bio, Inc..
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
QTTB
Q32 Bio, Inc.
|
1 | 1 | 0 |
|
BLTE
Belite Bio, Inc.
|
5 | 0 | 0 |
Q32 Bio, Inc. has a beta of 0.134, which suggesting that the stock is 86.587% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Belite Bio, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
Q32 Bio, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Belite Bio, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Q32 Bio, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Belite Bio, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
Q32 Bio, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Belite Bio, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Q32 Bio, Inc.'s net income of -$7.4M is higher than Belite Bio, Inc.'s net income of -$21.7M. Notably, Q32 Bio, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Belite Bio, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Q32 Bio, Inc. is -- versus -- for Belite Bio, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
QTTB
Q32 Bio, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -$7.4M |
|
BLTE
Belite Bio, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -$21.7M |
CEL-SCI Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Q32 Bio, Inc.'s net margin of --. Q32 Bio, Inc.'s return on equity of -634.27% beat CEL-SCI Corp.'s return on equity of -230.36%.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
QTTB
Q32 Bio, Inc.
|
-- | -$0.60 | -$1.4M |
|
CVM
CEL-SCI Corp.
|
-- | -$0.76 | $25.3M |
Q32 Bio, Inc. has a consensus price target of $15.00, signalling upside risk potential of 345.1%. On the other hand CEL-SCI Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $42.50 which suggests that it could grow by 608.33%. Given that CEL-SCI Corp. has higher upside potential than Q32 Bio, Inc., analysts believe CEL-SCI Corp. is more attractive than Q32 Bio, Inc..
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
QTTB
Q32 Bio, Inc.
|
1 | 1 | 0 |
|
CVM
CEL-SCI Corp.
|
1 | 0 | 0 |
Q32 Bio, Inc. has a beta of 0.134, which suggesting that the stock is 86.587% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CEL-SCI Corp. has a beta of 0.538, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.183%.
Q32 Bio, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CEL-SCI Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Q32 Bio, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CEL-SCI Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
Q32 Bio, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CEL-SCI Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Q32 Bio, Inc.'s net income of -$7.4M is lower than CEL-SCI Corp.'s net income of -$6.1M. Notably, Q32 Bio, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CEL-SCI Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Q32 Bio, Inc. is -- versus -- for CEL-SCI Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
QTTB
Q32 Bio, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -$7.4M |
|
CVM
CEL-SCI Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -$6.1M |
INVO Fertility, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Q32 Bio, Inc.'s net margin of -150.51%. Q32 Bio, Inc.'s return on equity of -634.27% beat INVO Fertility, Inc.'s return on equity of -471.28%.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
QTTB
Q32 Bio, Inc.
|
-- | -$0.60 | -$1.4M |
|
IVF
INVO Fertility, Inc.
|
28.04% | -$6.14 | $10.1M |
Q32 Bio, Inc. has a consensus price target of $15.00, signalling upside risk potential of 345.1%. On the other hand INVO Fertility, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 14157.43%. Given that INVO Fertility, Inc. has higher upside potential than Q32 Bio, Inc., analysts believe INVO Fertility, Inc. is more attractive than Q32 Bio, Inc..
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
QTTB
Q32 Bio, Inc.
|
1 | 1 | 0 |
|
IVF
INVO Fertility, Inc.
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
Q32 Bio, Inc. has a beta of 0.134, which suggesting that the stock is 86.587% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison INVO Fertility, Inc. has a beta of 2.606, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 160.551%.
Q32 Bio, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. INVO Fertility, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Q32 Bio, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. INVO Fertility, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
Q32 Bio, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than INVO Fertility, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.8M. Q32 Bio, Inc.'s net income of -$7.4M is lower than INVO Fertility, Inc.'s net income of -$2.6M. Notably, Q32 Bio, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while INVO Fertility, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Q32 Bio, Inc. is -- versus 0.02x for INVO Fertility, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
QTTB
Q32 Bio, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -$7.4M |
|
IVF
INVO Fertility, Inc.
|
0.02x | -- | $1.8M | -$2.6M |
Kala Bio, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Q32 Bio, Inc.'s net margin of --. Q32 Bio, Inc.'s return on equity of -634.27% beat Kala Bio, Inc.'s return on equity of -1375.54%.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
QTTB
Q32 Bio, Inc.
|
-- | -$0.60 | -$1.4M |
|
KALA
Kala Bio, Inc.
|
-- | -$1.07 | $21.3M |
Q32 Bio, Inc. has a consensus price target of $15.00, signalling upside risk potential of 345.1%. On the other hand Kala Bio, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 143.51%. Given that Q32 Bio, Inc. has higher upside potential than Kala Bio, Inc., analysts believe Q32 Bio, Inc. is more attractive than Kala Bio, Inc..
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
QTTB
Q32 Bio, Inc.
|
1 | 1 | 0 |
|
KALA
Kala Bio, Inc.
|
0 | 2 | 0 |
Q32 Bio, Inc. has a beta of 0.134, which suggesting that the stock is 86.587% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kala Bio, Inc. has a beta of -2.429, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 342.929%.
Q32 Bio, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kala Bio, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Q32 Bio, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kala Bio, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
Q32 Bio, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Kala Bio, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Q32 Bio, Inc.'s net income of -$7.4M is higher than Kala Bio, Inc.'s net income of -$7.6M. Notably, Q32 Bio, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kala Bio, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Q32 Bio, Inc. is -- versus 7.18x for Kala Bio, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
QTTB
Q32 Bio, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -$7.4M |
|
KALA
Kala Bio, Inc.
|
7.18x | -- | -- | -$7.6M |
Signup to receive the latest stock alerts
In Q3, legendary macro investor Stan Druckenmiller sold his entire…
AI cloud computing business CoreWeave (NASDAQ:CRWV) has been through a…
In Q3, billionaire Stan Druckenmiller bought about 4,620 shares of…
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Regencell Bioscience Holdings Ltd. [RGC] is up 22.74% over the past day.
Innodata, Inc. [INOD] is up 4.84% over the past day.
AeroVironment, Inc. [AVAV] is up 6.62% over the past day.