QNST Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Interpublic Group of Companies has a net margin of -0.55% compared to QuinStreet's net margin of 12.06%. QuinStreet's return on equity of -5.56% beat The Interpublic Group of Companies's return on equity of 17.55%.

QuinStreet has a consensus price target of $31.20, signalling upside risk potential of 80.56%. On the other hand The Interpublic Group of Companies has an analysts' consensus of $34.11 which suggests that it could grow by 37.79%. Given that QuinStreet has higher upside potential than The Interpublic Group of Companies, analysts believe QuinStreet is more attractive than The Interpublic Group of Companies.

QuinStreet has a beta of 0.914, which suggesting that the stock is 8.634% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Interpublic Group of Companies has a beta of 1.011, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.102%.

QuinStreet has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Interpublic Group of Companies offers a yield of 5.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. QuinStreet pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Interpublic Group of Companies pays out 72.01% of its earnings as a dividend. The Interpublic Group of Companies's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

QuinStreet quarterly revenues are $282.6M, which are smaller than The Interpublic Group of Companies quarterly revenues of $2.9B. QuinStreet's net income of -$1.5M is lower than The Interpublic Group of Companies's net income of $344.5M. Notably, QuinStreet's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while The Interpublic Group of Companies's PE ratio is 13.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for QuinStreet is 1.04x versus 0.89x for The Interpublic Group of Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lendway has a net margin of -0.55% compared to QuinStreet's net margin of -16.97%. QuinStreet's return on equity of -5.56% beat Lendway's return on equity of -20.1%.

QuinStreet has a consensus price target of $31.20, signalling upside risk potential of 80.56%. On the other hand Lendway has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that QuinStreet has higher upside potential than Lendway, analysts believe QuinStreet is more attractive than Lendway.

QuinStreet has a beta of 0.914, which suggesting that the stock is 8.634% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lendway has a beta of 2.135, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 113.468%.

QuinStreet has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lendway offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. QuinStreet pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lendway pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

QuinStreet quarterly revenues are $282.6M, which are larger than Lendway quarterly revenues of $6.6M. QuinStreet's net income of -$1.5M is lower than Lendway's net income of -$1.1M. Notably, QuinStreet's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lendway's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for QuinStreet is 1.04x versus 0.19x for Lendway. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Magnite has a net margin of -0.55% compared to QuinStreet's net margin of 18.77%. QuinStreet's return on equity of -5.56% beat Magnite's return on equity of 3.16%.

QuinStreet has a consensus price target of $31.20, signalling upside risk potential of 80.56%. On the other hand Magnite has an analysts' consensus of $19.54 which suggests that it could grow by 59.92%. Given that QuinStreet has higher upside potential than Magnite, analysts believe QuinStreet is more attractive than Magnite.

QuinStreet has a beta of 0.914, which suggesting that the stock is 8.634% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Magnite has a beta of 2.660, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 165.983%.

QuinStreet has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Magnite offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. QuinStreet pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Magnite pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

QuinStreet quarterly revenues are $282.6M, which are larger than Magnite quarterly revenues of $194M. QuinStreet's net income of -$1.5M is lower than Magnite's net income of $36.4M. Notably, QuinStreet's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Magnite's PE ratio is 87.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for QuinStreet is 1.04x versus 2.72x for Magnite. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Specificity has a net margin of -0.55% compared to QuinStreet's net margin of --. QuinStreet's return on equity of -5.56% beat Specificity's return on equity of --.

QuinStreet has a consensus price target of $31.20, signalling upside risk potential of 80.56%. On the other hand Specificity has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that QuinStreet has higher upside potential than Specificity, analysts believe QuinStreet is more attractive than Specificity.

QuinStreet has a beta of 0.914, which suggesting that the stock is 8.634% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Specificity has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

QuinStreet has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Specificity offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. QuinStreet pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Specificity pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

QuinStreet quarterly revenues are $282.6M, which are larger than Specificity quarterly revenues of --. QuinStreet's net income of -$1.5M is higher than Specificity's net income of --. Notably, QuinStreet's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Specificity's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for QuinStreet is 1.04x versus 3.57x for Specificity. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.