QNST Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Marchex has a net margin of -0.49% compared to QuinStreet's net margin of -6.62%. QuinStreet's return on equity of -10.16% beat Marchex's return on equity of -11.83%.

QuinStreet has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 26.69%. On the other hand Marchex has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 60.1%. Given that Marchex has higher upside potential than QuinStreet, analysts believe Marchex is more attractive than QuinStreet.

QuinStreet has a beta of 1.071, which suggesting that the stock is 7.093% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marchex has a beta of 1.915, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 91.512%.

QuinStreet has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Marchex offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. QuinStreet pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Marchex pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

QuinStreet quarterly revenues are $279.2M, which are larger than Marchex quarterly revenues of $12.6M. QuinStreet's net income of -$1.4M is lower than Marchex's net income of -$831K. Notably, QuinStreet's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Marchex's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for QuinStreet is 1.65x versus 1.99x for Marchex. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

National CineMedia has a net margin of -0.49% compared to QuinStreet's net margin of -5.77%. QuinStreet's return on equity of -10.16% beat National CineMedia's return on equity of -5.77%.

QuinStreet has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 26.69%. On the other hand National CineMedia has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 19.98%. Given that QuinStreet has higher upside potential than National CineMedia, analysts believe QuinStreet is more attractive than National CineMedia.

QuinStreet has a beta of 1.071, which suggesting that the stock is 7.093% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison National CineMedia has a beta of 2.073, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 107.331%.

QuinStreet has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. National CineMedia offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. QuinStreet pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. National CineMedia pays out 0.07% of its earnings as a dividend. National CineMedia's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

QuinStreet quarterly revenues are $279.2M, which are larger than National CineMedia quarterly revenues of $62.4M. QuinStreet's net income of -$1.4M is higher than National CineMedia's net income of -$3.6M. Notably, QuinStreet's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while National CineMedia's PE ratio is 2.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for QuinStreet is 1.65x versus 2.64x for National CineMedia. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Specificity has a net margin of -0.49% compared to QuinStreet's net margin of --. QuinStreet's return on equity of -10.16% beat Specificity's return on equity of --.

QuinStreet has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 26.69%. On the other hand Specificity has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that QuinStreet has higher upside potential than Specificity, analysts believe QuinStreet is more attractive than Specificity.

QuinStreet has a beta of 1.071, which suggesting that the stock is 7.093% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Specificity has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

QuinStreet has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Specificity offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. QuinStreet pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Specificity pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

QuinStreet quarterly revenues are $279.2M, which are larger than Specificity quarterly revenues of --. QuinStreet's net income of -$1.4M is higher than Specificity's net income of --. Notably, QuinStreet's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Specificity's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for QuinStreet is 1.65x versus 6.65x for Specificity. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ziff Davis has a net margin of -0.49% compared to QuinStreet's net margin of -13.74%. QuinStreet's return on equity of -10.16% beat Ziff Davis's return on equity of 3.38%.

QuinStreet has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 26.69%. On the other hand Ziff Davis has an analysts' consensus of $73.43 which suggests that it could grow by 34.04%. Given that Ziff Davis has higher upside potential than QuinStreet, analysts believe Ziff Davis is more attractive than QuinStreet.

QuinStreet has a beta of 1.071, which suggesting that the stock is 7.093% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ziff Davis has a beta of 1.360, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.028%.

QuinStreet has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ziff Davis offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. QuinStreet pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ziff Davis pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

QuinStreet quarterly revenues are $279.2M, which are smaller than Ziff Davis quarterly revenues of $353.6M. QuinStreet's net income of -$1.4M is higher than Ziff Davis's net income of -$48.6M. Notably, QuinStreet's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ziff Davis's PE ratio is 46.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for QuinStreet is 1.65x versus 1.85x for Ziff Davis. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.