Financhill
Buy
58

QMOM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$71.62
Seasonality move :
0.53%
Day range:
$70.60 - $71.14
52-week range:
$49.79 - $71.14
Dividend yield:
0.5%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
13.9K
Avg. volume:
20.9K
1-year change:
3%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
QMOM
Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momentum ETF
-- -- -- -- --
FAD
First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
-- -- -- -- --
FFTY
Innovator IBD 50 ETF
-- -- -- -- --
FRTY
Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF
-- -- -- -- --
RFG
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth ETF
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
QMOM
Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momentum ETF
$70.71 -- -- -- $0.35 0.5% --
FAD
First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
$169.61 -- -- -- $0.01 0.09% --
FFTY
Innovator IBD 50 ETF
$38.27 -- -- -- $0.47 1.23% --
FRTY
Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF
$21.93 -- -- -- $0.04 0.19% --
RFG
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth ETF
$56.46 -- -- -- $0.03 0.4% --
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
QMOM
Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momentum ETF
-- 1.075 -- --
FAD
First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
-- 1.256 -- --
FFTY
Innovator IBD 50 ETF
-- 1.716 -- --
FRTY
Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF
-- 1.944 -- --
RFG
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth ETF
-- 1.078 -- --
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
QMOM
Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momentum ETF
-- -- -- -- -- --
FAD
First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
-- -- -- -- -- --
FFTY
Innovator IBD 50 ETF
-- -- -- -- -- --
FRTY
Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF
-- -- -- -- -- --
RFG
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth ETF
-- -- -- -- -- --

Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momentum ETF vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns QMOM or FAD?

    First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund has a net margin of -- compared to Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momentum ETF's net margin of --. Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momentum ETF's return on equity of -- beat First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    QMOM
    Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momentum ETF
    -- -- --
    FAD
    First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About QMOM or FAD?

    Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momentum ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momentum ETF has higher upside potential than First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund, analysts believe Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momentum ETF is more attractive than First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    QMOM
    Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momentum ETF
    0 0 0
    FAD
    First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
    0 0 0
  • Is QMOM or FAD More Risky?

    Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momentum ETF has a beta of 0.979, which suggesting that the stock is 2.054% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund has a beta of 1.144, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.391%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock QMOM or FAD?

    Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momentum ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.5%. First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund offers a yield of 0.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momentum ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios QMOM or FAD?

    Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momentum ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund quarterly revenues of --. Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momentum ETF's net income of -- is lower than First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund's net income of --. Notably, Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momentum ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momentum ETF is -- versus -- for First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    QMOM
    Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momentum ETF
    -- -- -- --
    FAD
    First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns QMOM or FFTY?

    Innovator IBD 50 ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momentum ETF's net margin of --. Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momentum ETF's return on equity of -- beat Innovator IBD 50 ETF's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    QMOM
    Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momentum ETF
    -- -- --
    FFTY
    Innovator IBD 50 ETF
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About QMOM or FFTY?

    Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momentum ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Innovator IBD 50 ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momentum ETF has higher upside potential than Innovator IBD 50 ETF, analysts believe Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momentum ETF is more attractive than Innovator IBD 50 ETF.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    QMOM
    Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momentum ETF
    0 0 0
    FFTY
    Innovator IBD 50 ETF
    0 0 0
  • Is QMOM or FFTY More Risky?

    Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momentum ETF has a beta of 0.979, which suggesting that the stock is 2.054% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Innovator IBD 50 ETF has a beta of 1.404, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.449%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock QMOM or FFTY?

    Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momentum ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.5%. Innovator IBD 50 ETF offers a yield of 1.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momentum ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Innovator IBD 50 ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios QMOM or FFTY?

    Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momentum ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Innovator IBD 50 ETF quarterly revenues of --. Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momentum ETF's net income of -- is lower than Innovator IBD 50 ETF's net income of --. Notably, Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momentum ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Innovator IBD 50 ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momentum ETF is -- versus -- for Innovator IBD 50 ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    QMOM
    Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momentum ETF
    -- -- -- --
    FFTY
    Innovator IBD 50 ETF
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns QMOM or FRTY?

    Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momentum ETF's net margin of --. Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momentum ETF's return on equity of -- beat Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    QMOM
    Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momentum ETF
    -- -- --
    FRTY
    Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About QMOM or FRTY?

    Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momentum ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momentum ETF has higher upside potential than Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF, analysts believe Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momentum ETF is more attractive than Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    QMOM
    Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momentum ETF
    0 0 0
    FRTY
    Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF
    0 0 0
  • Is QMOM or FRTY More Risky?

    Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momentum ETF has a beta of 0.979, which suggesting that the stock is 2.054% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock QMOM or FRTY?

    Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momentum ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.5%. Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF offers a yield of 0.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momentum ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios QMOM or FRTY?

    Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momentum ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF quarterly revenues of --. Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momentum ETF's net income of -- is lower than Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF's net income of --. Notably, Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momentum ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momentum ETF is -- versus -- for Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    QMOM
    Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momentum ETF
    -- -- -- --
    FRTY
    Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns QMOM or RFG?

    Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momentum ETF's net margin of --. Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momentum ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth ETF's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    QMOM
    Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momentum ETF
    -- -- --
    RFG
    Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth ETF
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About QMOM or RFG?

    Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momentum ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momentum ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth ETF, analysts believe Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momentum ETF is more attractive than Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth ETF.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    QMOM
    Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momentum ETF
    0 0 0
    RFG
    Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth ETF
    0 0 0
  • Is QMOM or RFG More Risky?

    Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momentum ETF has a beta of 0.979, which suggesting that the stock is 2.054% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth ETF has a beta of 1.125, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.494%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock QMOM or RFG?

    Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momentum ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.5%. Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth ETF offers a yield of 0.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momentum ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios QMOM or RFG?

    Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momentum ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth ETF quarterly revenues of --. Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momentum ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth ETF's net income of --. Notably, Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momentum ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momentum ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    QMOM
    Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momentum ETF
    -- -- -- --
    RFG
    Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth ETF
    -- -- -- --

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Where Will ISRG Stock Be in 5 Years?
Where Will ISRG Stock Be in 5 Years?

Intuitive Surgical (NASDAQ:ISRG) is the innovative medical tech business behind…

Is Kratos Stock a Good Investment?
Is Kratos Stock a Good Investment?

UAV and hypersonic system defense contractor Kratos (NASDAQ:KTOS) has swung…

Is Palantir Stock Going to Crash?
Is Palantir Stock Going to Crash?

AI and data analytics major Palantir (NASDAQ:PLTR) has become something…

Stock Ideas

Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 63x

Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 41x

Sell
50
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 41x

Alerts

Buy
52
CVLT alert for Jan 27

Commvault Systems, Inc. [CVLT] is down 31.48% over the past day.

Sell
47
AGYS alert for Jan 27

Agilysys, Inc. [AGYS] is down 19% over the past day.

Buy
71
GLSI alert for Jan 27

Greenwich LifeSciences, Inc. [GLSI] is up 11.1% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock