PGY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Castellum has a net margin of -27.07% compared to Pagaya Technologies's net margin of -11.03%. Pagaya Technologies's return on equity of -27.61% beat Castellum's return on equity of -74.03%.

Pagaya Technologies has a consensus price target of $20.70, signalling upside risk potential of 99.81%. On the other hand Castellum has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -21.77%. Given that Pagaya Technologies has higher upside potential than Castellum, analysts believe Pagaya Technologies is more attractive than Castellum.

Pagaya Technologies has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Castellum has a beta of -2.951, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 395.117%.

Pagaya Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Castellum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pagaya Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Castellum pays out -0.66% of its earnings as a dividend.

Pagaya Technologies quarterly revenues are $249.3M, which are larger than Castellum quarterly revenues of $11.6M. Pagaya Technologies's net income of -$67.5M is lower than Castellum's net income of -$1.3M. Notably, Pagaya Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Castellum's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pagaya Technologies is 0.75x versus 1.76x for Castellum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inuvo has a net margin of -27.07% compared to Pagaya Technologies's net margin of -9.14%. Pagaya Technologies's return on equity of -27.61% beat Inuvo's return on equity of -54%.

Pagaya Technologies has a consensus price target of $20.70, signalling upside risk potential of 99.81%. On the other hand Inuvo has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 48.83%. Given that Pagaya Technologies has higher upside potential than Inuvo, analysts believe Pagaya Technologies is more attractive than Inuvo.

Pagaya Technologies has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inuvo has a beta of 0.937, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.269%.

Pagaya Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inuvo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pagaya Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inuvo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Pagaya Technologies quarterly revenues are $249.3M, which are larger than Inuvo quarterly revenues of $22.4M. Pagaya Technologies's net income of -$67.5M is lower than Inuvo's net income of -$2M. Notably, Pagaya Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Inuvo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pagaya Technologies is 0.75x versus 1.13x for Inuvo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Issuer Direct has a net margin of -27.07% compared to Pagaya Technologies's net margin of -6.7%. Pagaya Technologies's return on equity of -27.61% beat Issuer Direct's return on equity of -3.74%.

Pagaya Technologies has a consensus price target of $20.70, signalling upside risk potential of 99.81%. On the other hand Issuer Direct has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 43.65%. Given that Pagaya Technologies has higher upside potential than Issuer Direct, analysts believe Pagaya Technologies is more attractive than Issuer Direct.

Pagaya Technologies has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Issuer Direct has a beta of 0.769, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.119%.

Pagaya Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Issuer Direct offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pagaya Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Issuer Direct pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Pagaya Technologies quarterly revenues are $249.3M, which are larger than Issuer Direct quarterly revenues of $7M. Pagaya Technologies's net income of -$67.5M is lower than Issuer Direct's net income of -$466K. Notably, Pagaya Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Issuer Direct's PE ratio is 59.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pagaya Technologies is 0.75x versus 1.19x for Issuer Direct. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WidePoint has a net margin of -27.07% compared to Pagaya Technologies's net margin of -1.23%. Pagaya Technologies's return on equity of -27.61% beat WidePoint's return on equity of -20.12%.

Pagaya Technologies has a consensus price target of $20.70, signalling upside risk potential of 99.81%. On the other hand WidePoint has an analysts' consensus of $6.50 which suggests that it could grow by 40.69%. Given that Pagaya Technologies has higher upside potential than WidePoint, analysts believe Pagaya Technologies is more attractive than WidePoint.

Pagaya Technologies has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WidePoint has a beta of 1.716, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.556%.

Pagaya Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. WidePoint offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pagaya Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WidePoint pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Pagaya Technologies quarterly revenues are $249.3M, which are larger than WidePoint quarterly revenues of $34.6M. Pagaya Technologies's net income of -$67.5M is lower than WidePoint's net income of -$425.2K. Notably, Pagaya Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while WidePoint's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pagaya Technologies is 0.75x versus 0.32x for WidePoint. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.