Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Sell Broadcom Stock?
In Q3, legendary macro investor Stan Druckenmiller sold his entire…
Sell
40
PDBA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$34.11
Seasonality move
:
-1.98%
Day range:
$34.01 - $34.19
52-week range:
$33.69 - $37.89
Dividend yield:
3.31%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
31.8K
Avg. volume:
12.4K
1-year change:
-2.74%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PDBA
Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CANE
Teucrium Sugar Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DBA
Invesco DB Agriculture Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SOYB
Teucrium Soybean Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
UGA
United States Gasoline Fund LP
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
UNL
United States 12 Month Natural Gas Fund LP
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PDBA
Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF
|
$34.11 | -- | -- | -- | $1.13 | 3.31% | -- |
|
CANE
Teucrium Sugar Fund
|
$9.72 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
DBA
Invesco DB Agriculture Fund
|
$25.57 | -- | -- | -- | $0.91 | 0% | -- |
|
SOYB
Teucrium Soybean Fund
|
$22.18 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
UGA
United States Gasoline Fund LP
|
$61.95 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
UNL
United States 12 Month Natural Gas Fund LP
|
$7.61 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PDBA
Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF
|
-- | -0.065 | -- | -- |
|
CANE
Teucrium Sugar Fund
|
-- | 0.566 | -- | -- |
|
DBA
Invesco DB Agriculture Fund
|
-- | -0.027 | -- | -- |
|
SOYB
Teucrium Soybean Fund
|
-- | 0.344 | -- | -- |
|
UGA
United States Gasoline Fund LP
|
-- | 1.128 | -- | -- |
|
UNL
United States 12 Month Natural Gas Fund LP
|
-- | 1.701 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PDBA
Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CANE
Teucrium Sugar Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DBA
Invesco DB Agriculture Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SOYB
Teucrium Soybean Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
UGA
United States Gasoline Fund LP
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
UNL
United States 12 Month Natural Gas Fund LP
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns PDBA or CANE?
Teucrium Sugar Fund has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF's net margin of --. Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF's return on equity of -- beat Teucrium Sugar Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PDBAInvesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF-- -- -- CANETeucrium Sugar Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PDBA or CANE?
Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Teucrium Sugar Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF has higher upside potential than Teucrium Sugar Fund, analysts believe Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF is more attractive than Teucrium Sugar Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PDBAInvesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF0 0 0 CANETeucrium Sugar Fund0 0 0 -
Is PDBA or CANE More Risky?
Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Teucrium Sugar Fund has a beta of 0.437, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.296%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PDBA or CANE?
Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.31%. Teucrium Sugar Fund offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Teucrium Sugar Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PDBA or CANE?
Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Teucrium Sugar Fund quarterly revenues of --. Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF's net income of -- is lower than Teucrium Sugar Fund's net income of --. Notably, Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Teucrium Sugar Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF is -- versus -- for Teucrium Sugar Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PDBAInvesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF-- -- -- -- CANETeucrium Sugar Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PDBA or DBA?
Invesco DB Agriculture Fund has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF's net margin of --. Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco DB Agriculture Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PDBAInvesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF-- -- -- DBAInvesco DB Agriculture Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PDBA or DBA?
Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco DB Agriculture Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco DB Agriculture Fund, analysts believe Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF is more attractive than Invesco DB Agriculture Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PDBAInvesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF0 0 0 DBAInvesco DB Agriculture Fund0 0 0 -
Is PDBA or DBA More Risky?
Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco DB Agriculture Fund has a beta of 0.438, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.239%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PDBA or DBA?
Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.31%. Invesco DB Agriculture Fund offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share. Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco DB Agriculture Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PDBA or DBA?
Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco DB Agriculture Fund quarterly revenues of --. Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco DB Agriculture Fund's net income of --. Notably, Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco DB Agriculture Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco DB Agriculture Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PDBAInvesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF-- -- -- -- DBAInvesco DB Agriculture Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PDBA or SOYB?
Teucrium Soybean Fund has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF's net margin of --. Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF's return on equity of -- beat Teucrium Soybean Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PDBAInvesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF-- -- -- SOYBTeucrium Soybean Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PDBA or SOYB?
Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Teucrium Soybean Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF has higher upside potential than Teucrium Soybean Fund, analysts believe Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF is more attractive than Teucrium Soybean Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PDBAInvesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF0 0 0 SOYBTeucrium Soybean Fund0 0 0 -
Is PDBA or SOYB More Risky?
Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Teucrium Soybean Fund has a beta of 0.689, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.138%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PDBA or SOYB?
Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.31%. Teucrium Soybean Fund offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Teucrium Soybean Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PDBA or SOYB?
Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Teucrium Soybean Fund quarterly revenues of --. Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF's net income of -- is lower than Teucrium Soybean Fund's net income of --. Notably, Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Teucrium Soybean Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF is -- versus -- for Teucrium Soybean Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PDBAInvesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF-- -- -- -- SOYBTeucrium Soybean Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PDBA or UGA?
United States Gasoline Fund LP has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF's net margin of --. Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF's return on equity of -- beat United States Gasoline Fund LP's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PDBAInvesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF-- -- -- UGAUnited States Gasoline Fund LP-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PDBA or UGA?
Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand United States Gasoline Fund LP has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF has higher upside potential than United States Gasoline Fund LP, analysts believe Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF is more attractive than United States Gasoline Fund LP.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PDBAInvesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF0 0 0 UGAUnited States Gasoline Fund LP0 0 0 -
Is PDBA or UGA More Risky?
Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United States Gasoline Fund LP has a beta of 1.065, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.532%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PDBA or UGA?
Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.31%. United States Gasoline Fund LP offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. United States Gasoline Fund LP pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PDBA or UGA?
Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than United States Gasoline Fund LP quarterly revenues of --. Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF's net income of -- is lower than United States Gasoline Fund LP's net income of --. Notably, Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while United States Gasoline Fund LP's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF is -- versus -- for United States Gasoline Fund LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PDBAInvesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF-- -- -- -- UGAUnited States Gasoline Fund LP-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PDBA or UNL?
United States 12 Month Natural Gas Fund LP has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF's net margin of --. Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF's return on equity of -- beat United States 12 Month Natural Gas Fund LP's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PDBAInvesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF-- -- -- UNLUnited States 12 Month Natural Gas Fund LP-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PDBA or UNL?
Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand United States 12 Month Natural Gas Fund LP has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF has higher upside potential than United States 12 Month Natural Gas Fund LP, analysts believe Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF is more attractive than United States 12 Month Natural Gas Fund LP.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PDBAInvesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF0 0 0 UNLUnited States 12 Month Natural Gas Fund LP0 0 0 -
Is PDBA or UNL More Risky?
Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United States 12 Month Natural Gas Fund LP has a beta of 2.029, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 102.934%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PDBA or UNL?
Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.31%. United States 12 Month Natural Gas Fund LP offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. United States 12 Month Natural Gas Fund LP pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PDBA or UNL?
Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than United States 12 Month Natural Gas Fund LP quarterly revenues of --. Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF's net income of -- is lower than United States 12 Month Natural Gas Fund LP's net income of --. Notably, Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while United States 12 Month Natural Gas Fund LP's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF is -- versus -- for United States 12 Month Natural Gas Fund LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PDBAInvesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF-- -- -- -- UNLUnited States 12 Month Natural Gas Fund LP-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Is CoreWeave Stock Down So Much?
AI cloud computing business CoreWeave (NASDAQ:CRWV) has been through a…
Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Buy MercadoLibre Stock?
In Q3, billionaire Stan Druckenmiller bought about 4,620 shares of…
Stock Ideas
Buy
56
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Sell
14
SMX alert for Dec 31
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 40.26% over the past day.
Buy
71
ZCSH alert for Dec 31
Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) [ZCSH] is down 4.56% over the past day.
Buy
80
FTAI alert for Dec 31
FTAI Aviation Ltd. [FTAI] is up 14.37% over the past day.
