Will Tesla Stock Go Up In 2026?
EV giant Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) has, somewhat surprisingly, undershot the broader…
Sell
22
PATN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$26.89
Seasonality move
:
--
Day range:
$26.80 - $27.02
52-week range:
$18.32 - $27.78
Dividend yield:
0.51%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
28.6K
Avg. volume:
5.4K
1-year change:
35.11%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PATN
Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CEFA
Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-US ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CIL
VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DMCY
Democracy International Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EASG
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Selection Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QLVD
FlexShares Dev Mkts ex-US Ql Low Volatility Idx Fd
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PATN
Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF
|
$26.96 | -- | -- | -- | $0.01 | 0.51% | -- |
|
CEFA
Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-US ETF
|
$37.36 | -- | -- | -- | $0.39 | 1.86% | -- |
|
CIL
VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF
|
$53.31 | -- | -- | -- | $0.10 | 2.74% | -- |
|
DMCY
Democracy International Fund
|
$31.02 | -- | -- | -- | $0.09 | 2.37% | -- |
|
EASG
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Selection Equity ETF
|
$35.77 | -- | -- | -- | $0.56 | 2.51% | -- |
|
QLVD
FlexShares Dev Mkts ex-US Ql Low Volatility Idx Fd
|
$31.88 | -- | -- | -- | $0.16 | 2.58% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PATN
Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF
|
-- | 1.033 | -- | -- |
|
CEFA
Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-US ETF
|
-- | 0.483 | -- | -- |
|
CIL
VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF
|
-- | 0.972 | -- | -- |
|
DMCY
Democracy International Fund
|
-- | 1.080 | -- | -- |
|
EASG
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Selection Equity ETF
|
-- | 1.174 | -- | -- |
|
QLVD
FlexShares Dev Mkts ex-US Ql Low Volatility Idx Fd
|
-- | 0.810 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PATN
Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CEFA
Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-US ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CIL
VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DMCY
Democracy International Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EASG
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Selection Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QLVD
FlexShares Dev Mkts ex-US Ql Low Volatility Idx Fd
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns PATN or CEFA?
Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-US ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF's net margin of --. Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-US ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PATNPacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF-- -- -- CEFAGlobal X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-US ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PATN or CEFA?
Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-US ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF has higher upside potential than Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-US ETF, analysts believe Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF is more attractive than Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-US ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PATNPacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF0 0 0 CEFAGlobal X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-US ETF0 0 0 -
Is PATN or CEFA More Risky?
Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-US ETF has a beta of 1.022, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.214%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PATN or CEFA?
Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.51%. Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-US ETF offers a yield of 1.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-US ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PATN or CEFA?
Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-US ETF quarterly revenues of --. Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-US ETF's net income of --. Notably, Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-US ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF is -- versus -- for Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-US ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PATNPacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF-- -- -- -- CEFAGlobal X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-US ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PATN or CIL?
VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF's net margin of --. Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF's return on equity of -- beat VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PATNPacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF-- -- -- CILVictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PATN or CIL?
Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF has higher upside potential than VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF, analysts believe Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF is more attractive than VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PATNPacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF0 0 0 CILVictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF0 0 0 -
Is PATN or CIL More Risky?
Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF has a beta of 1.014, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.431%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PATN or CIL?
Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.51%. VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF offers a yield of 2.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PATN or CIL?
Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF quarterly revenues of --. Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF's net income of -- is lower than VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF's net income of --. Notably, Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF is -- versus -- for VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PATNPacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF-- -- -- -- CILVictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PATN or DMCY?
Democracy International Fund has a net margin of -- compared to Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF's net margin of --. Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF's return on equity of -- beat Democracy International Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PATNPacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF-- -- -- DMCYDemocracy International Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PATN or DMCY?
Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Democracy International Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF has higher upside potential than Democracy International Fund, analysts believe Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF is more attractive than Democracy International Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PATNPacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF0 0 0 DMCYDemocracy International Fund0 0 0 -
Is PATN or DMCY More Risky?
Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Democracy International Fund has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PATN or DMCY?
Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.51%. Democracy International Fund offers a yield of 2.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Democracy International Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PATN or DMCY?
Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Democracy International Fund quarterly revenues of --. Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF's net income of -- is lower than Democracy International Fund's net income of --. Notably, Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Democracy International Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF is -- versus -- for Democracy International Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PATNPacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF-- -- -- -- DMCYDemocracy International Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PATN or EASG?
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Selection Equity ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF's net margin of --. Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF's return on equity of -- beat Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Selection Equity ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PATNPacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF-- -- -- EASGXtrackers MSCI EAFE Selection Equity ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PATN or EASG?
Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Selection Equity ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF has higher upside potential than Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Selection Equity ETF, analysts believe Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF is more attractive than Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Selection Equity ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PATNPacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF0 0 0 EASGXtrackers MSCI EAFE Selection Equity ETF0 0 0 -
Is PATN or EASG More Risky?
Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Selection Equity ETF has a beta of 1.066, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.611%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PATN or EASG?
Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.51%. Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Selection Equity ETF offers a yield of 2.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share. Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Selection Equity ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PATN or EASG?
Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Selection Equity ETF quarterly revenues of --. Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF's net income of -- is lower than Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Selection Equity ETF's net income of --. Notably, Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Selection Equity ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF is -- versus -- for Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Selection Equity ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PATNPacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF-- -- -- -- EASGXtrackers MSCI EAFE Selection Equity ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PATN or QLVD?
FlexShares Dev Mkts ex-US Ql Low Volatility Idx Fd has a net margin of -- compared to Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF's net margin of --. Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF's return on equity of -- beat FlexShares Dev Mkts ex-US Ql Low Volatility Idx Fd's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PATNPacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF-- -- -- QLVDFlexShares Dev Mkts ex-US Ql Low Volatility Idx Fd-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PATN or QLVD?
Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand FlexShares Dev Mkts ex-US Ql Low Volatility Idx Fd has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF has higher upside potential than FlexShares Dev Mkts ex-US Ql Low Volatility Idx Fd, analysts believe Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF is more attractive than FlexShares Dev Mkts ex-US Ql Low Volatility Idx Fd.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PATNPacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF0 0 0 QLVDFlexShares Dev Mkts ex-US Ql Low Volatility Idx Fd0 0 0 -
Is PATN or QLVD More Risky?
Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FlexShares Dev Mkts ex-US Ql Low Volatility Idx Fd has a beta of 0.764, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.58%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PATN or QLVD?
Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.51%. FlexShares Dev Mkts ex-US Ql Low Volatility Idx Fd offers a yield of 2.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. FlexShares Dev Mkts ex-US Ql Low Volatility Idx Fd pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PATN or QLVD?
Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than FlexShares Dev Mkts ex-US Ql Low Volatility Idx Fd quarterly revenues of --. Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF's net income of -- is lower than FlexShares Dev Mkts ex-US Ql Low Volatility Idx Fd's net income of --. Notably, Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while FlexShares Dev Mkts ex-US Ql Low Volatility Idx Fd's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF is -- versus -- for FlexShares Dev Mkts ex-US Ql Low Volatility Idx Fd. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PATNPacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF-- -- -- -- QLVDFlexShares Dev Mkts ex-US Ql Low Volatility Idx Fd-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
What Are the Best AI Power Stocks?
As the construction of AI infrastructure accelerates, the gap between…
Is IONQ The Best Quantum Stock to Buy?
Riding a wave of investor enthusiasm for the technology, quantum…
Stock Ideas
Sell
50
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.3T
P/E Ratio: 60x
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
69
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Alerts
Sell
39
SMX alert for Dec 17
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 18.2% over the past day.
Sell
33
ZBIO alert for Dec 17
Zenas BioPharma, Inc. [ZBIO] is up 13.35% over the past day.
Buy
75
AFRM alert for Dec 17
Affirm Holdings, Inc. [AFRM] is up 11.77% over the past day.
