NTNX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Duos Technologies Group has a net margin of 8.62% compared to Nutanix's net margin of -43.28%. Nutanix's return on equity of -- beat Duos Technologies Group's return on equity of -239.87%.

Nutanix has a consensus price target of $89.11, signalling upside risk potential of 25.31%. On the other hand Duos Technologies Group has an analysts' consensus of $10.75 which suggests that it could grow by 66.15%. Given that Duos Technologies Group has higher upside potential than Nutanix, analysts believe Duos Technologies Group is more attractive than Nutanix.

Nutanix has a beta of 1.040, which suggesting that the stock is 4.007% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Duos Technologies Group has a beta of 1.021, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.112%.

Nutanix has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Duos Technologies Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nutanix pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Duos Technologies Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nutanix quarterly revenues are $654.7M, which are larger than Duos Technologies Group quarterly revenues of $3.2M. Nutanix's net income of $56.4M is higher than Duos Technologies Group's net income of -$1.4M. Notably, Nutanix's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Duos Technologies Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nutanix is 8.38x versus 6.55x for Duos Technologies Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Foxx Development Holdings has a net margin of 8.62% compared to Nutanix's net margin of 8.15%. Nutanix's return on equity of -- beat Foxx Development Holdings's return on equity of --.

Nutanix has a consensus price target of $89.11, signalling upside risk potential of 25.31%. On the other hand Foxx Development Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Nutanix has higher upside potential than Foxx Development Holdings, analysts believe Nutanix is more attractive than Foxx Development Holdings.

Nutanix has a beta of 1.040, which suggesting that the stock is 4.007% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Foxx Development Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Nutanix has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Foxx Development Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nutanix pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Foxx Development Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nutanix quarterly revenues are $654.7M, which are larger than Foxx Development Holdings quarterly revenues of $17.5M. Nutanix's net income of $56.4M is higher than Foxx Development Holdings's net income of $1.4M. Notably, Nutanix's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Foxx Development Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nutanix is 8.38x versus 0.71x for Foxx Development Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA has a net margin of 8.62% compared to Nutanix's net margin of 56.17%. Nutanix's return on equity of -- beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 123.32%.

Nutanix has a consensus price target of $89.11, signalling upside risk potential of 25.31%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $172.50 which suggests that it could grow by 44.31%. Given that NVIDIA has higher upside potential than Nutanix, analysts believe NVIDIA is more attractive than Nutanix.

Nutanix has a beta of 1.040, which suggesting that the stock is 4.007% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 1.766, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.633%.

Nutanix has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Nutanix pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nutanix quarterly revenues are $654.7M, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $39.3B. Nutanix's net income of $56.4M is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $22.1B. Notably, Nutanix's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 40.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nutanix is 8.38x versus 22.72x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Teradata has a net margin of 8.62% compared to Nutanix's net margin of 6.11%. Nutanix's return on equity of -- beat Teradata's return on equity of 109.2%.

Nutanix has a consensus price target of $89.11, signalling upside risk potential of 25.31%. On the other hand Teradata has an analysts' consensus of $30.20 which suggests that it could grow by 29.67%. Given that Teradata has higher upside potential than Nutanix, analysts believe Teradata is more attractive than Nutanix.

Nutanix has a beta of 1.040, which suggesting that the stock is 4.007% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Teradata has a beta of 0.749, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.138%.

Nutanix has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Teradata offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nutanix pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Teradata pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nutanix quarterly revenues are $654.7M, which are larger than Teradata quarterly revenues of $409M. Nutanix's net income of $56.4M is higher than Teradata's net income of $25M. Notably, Nutanix's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Teradata's PE ratio is 19.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nutanix is 8.38x versus 1.31x for Teradata. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.