NTIC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Green Plains has a net margin of 7.86% compared to Northern Technologies International's net margin of 7.32%. Northern Technologies International's return on equity of 7.48% beat Green Plains's return on equity of -2.17%.

Northern Technologies International has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 50.72%. On the other hand Green Plains has an analysts' consensus of $20.69 which suggests that it could grow by 106.05%. Given that Green Plains has higher upside potential than Northern Technologies International, analysts believe Green Plains is more attractive than Northern Technologies International.

Northern Technologies International has a beta of 0.616, which suggesting that the stock is 38.374% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Green Plains has a beta of 1.463, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.309%.

Northern Technologies International has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.11%. Green Plains offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Northern Technologies International pays 48.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Green Plains pays out -24.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Northern Technologies International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Northern Technologies International quarterly revenues are $23.3M, which are smaller than Green Plains quarterly revenues of $658.7M. Northern Technologies International's net income of $1.8M is lower than Green Plains's net income of $48.2M. Notably, Northern Technologies International's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.13x while Green Plains's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Northern Technologies International is 1.53x versus 0.25x for Green Plains. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Origin Materials has a net margin of 7.86% compared to Northern Technologies International's net margin of -448.22%. Northern Technologies International's return on equity of 7.48% beat Origin Materials's return on equity of -20.11%.

Northern Technologies International has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 50.72%. On the other hand Origin Materials has an analysts' consensus of $2.50 which suggests that it could grow by 100%. Given that Origin Materials has higher upside potential than Northern Technologies International, analysts believe Origin Materials is more attractive than Northern Technologies International.

Northern Technologies International has a beta of 0.616, which suggesting that the stock is 38.374% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Origin Materials has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Northern Technologies International has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.11%. Origin Materials offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Northern Technologies International pays 48.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Origin Materials pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Northern Technologies International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Northern Technologies International quarterly revenues are $23.3M, which are larger than Origin Materials quarterly revenues of $8.2M. Northern Technologies International's net income of $1.8M is higher than Origin Materials's net income of -$36.8M. Notably, Northern Technologies International's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.13x while Origin Materials's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Northern Technologies International is 1.53x versus 5.07x for Origin Materials. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada has a net margin of 7.86% compared to Northern Technologies International's net margin of --. Northern Technologies International's return on equity of 7.48% beat Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of --.

Northern Technologies International has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 50.72%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 234.92%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than Northern Technologies International, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than Northern Technologies International.

Northern Technologies International has a beta of 0.616, which suggesting that the stock is 38.374% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.881, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.144%.

Northern Technologies International has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.11%. Paramount Gold Nevada offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Northern Technologies International pays 48.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Northern Technologies International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Northern Technologies International quarterly revenues are $23.3M, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues of --. Northern Technologies International's net income of $1.8M is higher than Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Northern Technologies International's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.13x while Paramount Gold Nevada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Northern Technologies International is 1.53x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources has a net margin of 7.86% compared to Northern Technologies International's net margin of --. Northern Technologies International's return on equity of 7.48% beat Solitario Resources's return on equity of --.

Northern Technologies International has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 50.72%. On the other hand Solitario Resources has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 149.46%. Given that Solitario Resources has higher upside potential than Northern Technologies International, analysts believe Solitario Resources is more attractive than Northern Technologies International.

Northern Technologies International has a beta of 0.616, which suggesting that the stock is 38.374% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources has a beta of 0.890, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.984%.

Northern Technologies International has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.11%. Solitario Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Northern Technologies International pays 48.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Northern Technologies International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Northern Technologies International quarterly revenues are $23.3M, which are larger than Solitario Resources quarterly revenues of --. Northern Technologies International's net income of $1.8M is higher than Solitario Resources's net income of -$2.3M. Notably, Northern Technologies International's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.13x while Solitario Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Northern Technologies International is 1.53x versus -- for Solitario Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.