NNOX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Standard BioTools, Inc. has a net margin of -396.98% compared to Nano-X Imaging Ltd.'s net margin of -162.05%. Nano-X Imaging Ltd.'s return on equity of -32.75% beat Standard BioTools, Inc.'s return on equity of -24.44%.

Nano-X Imaging Ltd. has a consensus price target of $7.40, signalling upside risk potential of 230.36%. On the other hand Standard BioTools, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $1.55 which suggests that it could grow by 30.25%. Given that Nano-X Imaging Ltd. has higher upside potential than Standard BioTools, Inc., analysts believe Nano-X Imaging Ltd. is more attractive than Standard BioTools, Inc..

Nano-X Imaging Ltd. has a beta of 1.312, which suggesting that the stock is 31.211% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Standard BioTools, Inc. has a beta of 1.290, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.967%.

Nano-X Imaging Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Standard BioTools, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nano-X Imaging Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Standard BioTools, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nano-X Imaging Ltd. quarterly revenues are $3.4M, which are smaller than Standard BioTools, Inc. quarterly revenues of $19.6M. Nano-X Imaging Ltd.'s net income of -$13.7M is higher than Standard BioTools, Inc.'s net income of -$31.7M. Notably, Nano-X Imaging Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Standard BioTools, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nano-X Imaging Ltd. is 11.49x versus 3.50x for Standard BioTools, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ludwig Enterprises, Inc. has a net margin of -396.98% compared to Nano-X Imaging Ltd.'s net margin of -427991.3%. Nano-X Imaging Ltd.'s return on equity of -32.75% beat Ludwig Enterprises, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Nano-X Imaging Ltd. has a consensus price target of $7.40, signalling upside risk potential of 230.36%. On the other hand Ludwig Enterprises, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Nano-X Imaging Ltd. has higher upside potential than Ludwig Enterprises, Inc., analysts believe Nano-X Imaging Ltd. is more attractive than Ludwig Enterprises, Inc..

Nano-X Imaging Ltd. has a beta of 1.312, which suggesting that the stock is 31.211% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ludwig Enterprises, Inc. has a beta of 2.470, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 146.979%.

Nano-X Imaging Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ludwig Enterprises, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nano-X Imaging Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ludwig Enterprises, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nano-X Imaging Ltd. quarterly revenues are $3.4M, which are larger than Ludwig Enterprises, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Nano-X Imaging Ltd.'s net income of -$13.7M is lower than Ludwig Enterprises, Inc.'s net income of $31.3K. Notably, Nano-X Imaging Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ludwig Enterprises, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nano-X Imaging Ltd. is 11.49x versus 36,962.14x for Ludwig Enterprises, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Xylo Technologies Ltd. has a net margin of -396.98% compared to Nano-X Imaging Ltd.'s net margin of --. Nano-X Imaging Ltd.'s return on equity of -32.75% beat Xylo Technologies Ltd.'s return on equity of -51.7%.

Nano-X Imaging Ltd. has a consensus price target of $7.40, signalling upside risk potential of 230.36%. On the other hand Xylo Technologies Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $9.00 which suggests that it could grow by 77.52%. Given that Nano-X Imaging Ltd. has higher upside potential than Xylo Technologies Ltd., analysts believe Nano-X Imaging Ltd. is more attractive than Xylo Technologies Ltd..

Nano-X Imaging Ltd. has a beta of 1.312, which suggesting that the stock is 31.211% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xylo Technologies Ltd. has a beta of 0.321, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.93%.

Nano-X Imaging Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Xylo Technologies Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.94 per share. Nano-X Imaging Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Xylo Technologies Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nano-X Imaging Ltd. quarterly revenues are $3.4M, which are larger than Xylo Technologies Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Nano-X Imaging Ltd.'s net income of -$13.7M is higher than Xylo Technologies Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Nano-X Imaging Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Xylo Technologies Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nano-X Imaging Ltd. is 11.49x versus 0.13x for Xylo Technologies Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.