NNE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Broadwind has a net margin of -- compared to Nano Nuclear Energy's net margin of -2.72%. Nano Nuclear Energy's return on equity of -- beat Broadwind's return on equity of 1.97%.

Nano Nuclear Energy has a consensus price target of $47.50, signalling upside risk potential of 101.96%. On the other hand Broadwind has an analysts' consensus of $4.00 which suggests that it could grow by 150%. Given that Broadwind has higher upside potential than Nano Nuclear Energy, analysts believe Broadwind is more attractive than Nano Nuclear Energy.

Nano Nuclear Energy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Broadwind has a beta of 1.607, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.721%.

Nano Nuclear Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Broadwind offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nano Nuclear Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Broadwind pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nano Nuclear Energy quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Broadwind quarterly revenues of $33.6M. Nano Nuclear Energy's net income of -$3.1M is lower than Broadwind's net income of -$914K. Notably, Nano Nuclear Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Broadwind's PE ratio is 29.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nano Nuclear Energy is -- versus 0.25x for Broadwind. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CVD Equipment has a net margin of -- compared to Nano Nuclear Energy's net margin of 1.78%. Nano Nuclear Energy's return on equity of -- beat CVD Equipment's return on equity of -7.53%.

Nano Nuclear Energy has a consensus price target of $47.50, signalling upside risk potential of 101.96%. On the other hand CVD Equipment has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 455.56%. Given that CVD Equipment has higher upside potential than Nano Nuclear Energy, analysts believe CVD Equipment is more attractive than Nano Nuclear Energy.

Nano Nuclear Energy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CVD Equipment has a beta of 0.736, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.36%.

Nano Nuclear Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CVD Equipment offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nano Nuclear Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CVD Equipment pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nano Nuclear Energy quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CVD Equipment quarterly revenues of $7.4M. Nano Nuclear Energy's net income of -$3.1M is lower than CVD Equipment's net income of $132K. Notably, Nano Nuclear Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CVD Equipment's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nano Nuclear Energy is -- versus 0.73x for CVD Equipment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ocean Power Technologies has a net margin of -- compared to Nano Nuclear Energy's net margin of -814.55%. Nano Nuclear Energy's return on equity of -- beat Ocean Power Technologies's return on equity of -92.45%.

Nano Nuclear Energy has a consensus price target of $47.50, signalling upside risk potential of 101.96%. On the other hand Ocean Power Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Nano Nuclear Energy has higher upside potential than Ocean Power Technologies, analysts believe Nano Nuclear Energy is more attractive than Ocean Power Technologies.

Nano Nuclear Energy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ocean Power Technologies has a beta of 2.642, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 164.159%.

Nano Nuclear Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ocean Power Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nano Nuclear Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ocean Power Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nano Nuclear Energy quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Ocean Power Technologies quarterly revenues of $825K. Nano Nuclear Energy's net income of -$3.1M is higher than Ocean Power Technologies's net income of -$6.7M. Notably, Nano Nuclear Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ocean Power Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nano Nuclear Energy is -- versus 7.70x for Ocean Power Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SIFCO Industries has a net margin of -- compared to Nano Nuclear Energy's net margin of -11.09%. Nano Nuclear Energy's return on equity of -- beat SIFCO Industries's return on equity of -13.54%.

Nano Nuclear Energy has a consensus price target of $47.50, signalling upside risk potential of 101.96%. On the other hand SIFCO Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 347.21%. Given that SIFCO Industries has higher upside potential than Nano Nuclear Energy, analysts believe SIFCO Industries is more attractive than Nano Nuclear Energy.

Nano Nuclear Energy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SIFCO Industries has a beta of 1.035, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.542%.

Nano Nuclear Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SIFCO Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nano Nuclear Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SIFCO Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nano Nuclear Energy quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SIFCO Industries quarterly revenues of $20.9M. Nano Nuclear Energy's net income of -$3.1M is lower than SIFCO Industries's net income of -$2.3M. Notably, Nano Nuclear Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SIFCO Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nano Nuclear Energy is -- versus 0.21x for SIFCO Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.