NNE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

GE Vernova, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to NANO Nuclear Energy, Inc.'s net margin of 4.55%. NANO Nuclear Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of -26.98% beat GE Vernova, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.79%.

NANO Nuclear Energy, Inc. has a consensus price target of $46.67, signalling upside risk potential of 29.31%. On the other hand GE Vernova, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $754.58 which suggests that it could grow by 14.04%. Given that NANO Nuclear Energy, Inc. has higher upside potential than GE Vernova, Inc., analysts believe NANO Nuclear Energy, Inc. is more attractive than GE Vernova, Inc..

NANO Nuclear Energy, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GE Vernova, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

NANO Nuclear Energy, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GE Vernova, Inc. offers a yield of 0.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. NANO Nuclear Energy, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. GE Vernova, Inc. pays out 4.44% of its earnings as a dividend. GE Vernova, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NANO Nuclear Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than GE Vernova, Inc. quarterly revenues of $10B. NANO Nuclear Energy, Inc.'s net income of -$8.1M is lower than GE Vernova, Inc.'s net income of $453M. Notably, NANO Nuclear Energy, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while GE Vernova, Inc.'s PE ratio is 107.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NANO Nuclear Energy, Inc. is -- versus 4.86x for GE Vernova, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ocean Power Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to NANO Nuclear Energy, Inc.'s net margin of -2553.07%. NANO Nuclear Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of -26.98% beat Ocean Power Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -126.27%.

NANO Nuclear Energy, Inc. has a consensus price target of $46.67, signalling upside risk potential of 29.31%. On the other hand Ocean Power Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 248.84%. Given that Ocean Power Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than NANO Nuclear Energy, Inc., analysts believe Ocean Power Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than NANO Nuclear Energy, Inc..

NANO Nuclear Energy, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ocean Power Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 2.393, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 139.261%.

NANO Nuclear Energy, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ocean Power Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NANO Nuclear Energy, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ocean Power Technologies, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

NANO Nuclear Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Ocean Power Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of $424K. NANO Nuclear Energy, Inc.'s net income of -$8.1M is higher than Ocean Power Technologies, Inc.'s net income of -$10.8M. Notably, NANO Nuclear Energy, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ocean Power Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NANO Nuclear Energy, Inc. is -- versus 19.38x for Ocean Power Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SIFCO Industries, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to NANO Nuclear Energy, Inc.'s net margin of -2.15%. NANO Nuclear Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of -26.98% beat SIFCO Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of -2.76%.

NANO Nuclear Energy, Inc. has a consensus price target of $46.67, signalling upside risk potential of 29.31%. On the other hand SIFCO Industries, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 90.37%. Given that SIFCO Industries, Inc. has higher upside potential than NANO Nuclear Energy, Inc., analysts believe SIFCO Industries, Inc. is more attractive than NANO Nuclear Energy, Inc..

NANO Nuclear Energy, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SIFCO Industries, Inc. has a beta of 0.875, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.478%.

NANO Nuclear Energy, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SIFCO Industries, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NANO Nuclear Energy, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SIFCO Industries, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

NANO Nuclear Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SIFCO Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues of $22.8M. NANO Nuclear Energy, Inc.'s net income of -$8.1M is lower than SIFCO Industries, Inc.'s net income of -$491K. Notably, NANO Nuclear Energy, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SIFCO Industries, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NANO Nuclear Energy, Inc. is -- versus 0.47x for SIFCO Industries, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NuScale Power Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to NANO Nuclear Energy, Inc.'s net margin of -6462.58%. NANO Nuclear Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of -26.98% beat NuScale Power Corp.'s return on equity of -194.62%.

NANO Nuclear Energy, Inc. has a consensus price target of $46.67, signalling upside risk potential of 29.31%. On the other hand NuScale Power Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $34.19 which suggests that it could grow by 65.66%. Given that NuScale Power Corp. has higher upside potential than NANO Nuclear Energy, Inc., analysts believe NuScale Power Corp. is more attractive than NANO Nuclear Energy, Inc..

NANO Nuclear Energy, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NuScale Power Corp. has a beta of 2.119, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 111.869%.

NANO Nuclear Energy, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NuScale Power Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NANO Nuclear Energy, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NuScale Power Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

NANO Nuclear Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than NuScale Power Corp. quarterly revenues of $8.2M. NANO Nuclear Energy, Inc.'s net income of -$8.1M is higher than NuScale Power Corp.'s net income of -$532.6M. Notably, NANO Nuclear Energy, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NuScale Power Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NANO Nuclear Energy, Inc. is -- versus 40.92x for NuScale Power Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.