Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret
It’s not often that a company with the scale and…
Sell
50
NDAA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$19.69
Seasonality move
:
--
Day range:
$19.69 - $19.69
52-week range:
$19.64 - $20.41
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
--
1-year change:
--
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NDAA
Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AOA
iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DRAI
Draco Evolution AI ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GAL
SPDR SSGA Global Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MAPP
Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PCEF
Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NDAA
Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF
|
$19.69 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
AOA
iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF
|
$76.79 | -- | -- | -- | $0.74 | 2.29% | -- |
|
DRAI
Draco Evolution AI ETF
|
$23.52 | -- | -- | -- | $0.04 | 0.16% | -- |
|
GAL
SPDR SSGA Global Allocation ETF
|
$44.77 | -- | -- | -- | $0.23 | 2.23% | -- |
|
MAPP
Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF
|
$22.82 | -- | -- | -- | $0.55 | 2.4% | -- |
|
PCEF
Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF
|
$19.23 | -- | -- | -- | $0.14 | 8.73% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NDAA
Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
AOA
iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF
|
-- | 0.783 | -- | -- |
|
DRAI
Draco Evolution AI ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
GAL
SPDR SSGA Global Allocation ETF
|
-- | 0.618 | -- | -- |
|
MAPP
Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF
|
-- | 0.615 | -- | -- |
|
PCEF
Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF
|
-- | 0.748 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NDAA
Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AOA
iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DRAI
Draco Evolution AI ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GAL
SPDR SSGA Global Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MAPP
Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PCEF
Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns NDAA or AOA?
iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF's net margin of --. Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NDAANed Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF-- -- -- AOAiShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About NDAA or AOA?
Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF, analysts believe Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF is more attractive than iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NDAANed Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF0 0 0 AOAiShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF0 0 0 -
Is NDAA or AOA More Risky?
Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.800, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.966%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NDAA or AOA?
Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF offers a yield of 2.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.74 per share. Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NDAA or AOA?
Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF quarterly revenues of --. Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF's net income of --. Notably, Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NDAANed Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- AOAiShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns NDAA or DRAI?
Draco Evolution AI ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF's net margin of --. Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat Draco Evolution AI ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NDAANed Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF-- -- -- DRAIDraco Evolution AI ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About NDAA or DRAI?
Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Draco Evolution AI ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than Draco Evolution AI ETF, analysts believe Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF is more attractive than Draco Evolution AI ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NDAANed Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF0 0 0 DRAIDraco Evolution AI ETF0 0 0 -
Is NDAA or DRAI More Risky?
Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Draco Evolution AI ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NDAA or DRAI?
Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Draco Evolution AI ETF offers a yield of 0.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Draco Evolution AI ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NDAA or DRAI?
Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Draco Evolution AI ETF quarterly revenues of --. Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than Draco Evolution AI ETF's net income of --. Notably, Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Draco Evolution AI ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for Draco Evolution AI ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NDAANed Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- DRAIDraco Evolution AI ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns NDAA or GAL?
SPDR SSGA Global Allocation ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF's net margin of --. Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat SPDR SSGA Global Allocation ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NDAANed Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF-- -- -- GALSPDR SSGA Global Allocation ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About NDAA or GAL?
Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SPDR SSGA Global Allocation ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than SPDR SSGA Global Allocation ETF, analysts believe Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF is more attractive than SPDR SSGA Global Allocation ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NDAANed Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF0 0 0 GALSPDR SSGA Global Allocation ETF0 0 0 -
Is NDAA or GAL More Risky?
Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SPDR SSGA Global Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.677, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.275%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NDAA or GAL?
Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SPDR SSGA Global Allocation ETF offers a yield of 2.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SPDR SSGA Global Allocation ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NDAA or GAL?
Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SPDR SSGA Global Allocation ETF quarterly revenues of --. Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than SPDR SSGA Global Allocation ETF's net income of --. Notably, Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SPDR SSGA Global Allocation ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for SPDR SSGA Global Allocation ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NDAANed Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- GALSPDR SSGA Global Allocation ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns NDAA or MAPP?
Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF's net margin of --. Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NDAANed Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF-- -- -- MAPPHarbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About NDAA or MAPP?
Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF, analysts believe Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF is more attractive than Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NDAANed Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF0 0 0 MAPPHarbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF0 0 0 -
Is NDAA or MAPP More Risky?
Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NDAA or MAPP?
Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF offers a yield of 2.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NDAA or MAPP?
Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF quarterly revenues of --. Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF's net income of --. Notably, Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NDAANed Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- MAPPHarbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns NDAA or PCEF?
Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF's net margin of --. Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NDAANed Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF-- -- -- PCEFInvesco CEF Income Composite ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About NDAA or PCEF?
Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF, analysts believe Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF is more attractive than Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NDAANed Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF0 0 0 PCEFInvesco CEF Income Composite ETF0 0 0 -
Is NDAA or PCEF More Risky?
Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF has a beta of 0.851, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.93%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NDAA or PCEF?
Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF offers a yield of 8.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NDAA or PCEF?
Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF quarterly revenues of --. Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF's net income of --. Notably, Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NDAANed Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- PCEFInvesco CEF Income Composite ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Tyson Foods Stock Bounce Back?
Tyson Foods, Inc. (NYSE:TSN) is one of the biggest food…
Will Iovance Biotherapeutics Stock Bounce Back?
Iovance Biotherapeutics (NASDAQ:IOVA) is a fledgling pharmaceutical company that specializes…
Stock Ideas
Buy
64
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 113x
Buy
55
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
61
QMCO alert for Dec 23
Quantum [QMCO] is up 0.73% over the past day.
Sell
46
NUKK alert for Dec 23
Nukkleus [NUKK] is up 6.88% over the past day.
Sell
1
IIPR alert for Dec 23
Innovative Industrial Properties [IIPR] is down 5.35% over the past day.
