Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Sell
29
NDAA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$22.32
Seasonality move
:
-3.07%
Day range:
$21.90 - $21.90
52-week range:
$17.52 - $22.35
Dividend yield:
2.69%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
75
Avg. volume:
320
1-year change:
8.89%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NDAA
Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MKAM
MKAM ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
UPAR
UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NDAA
Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF
|
$21.90 | -- | -- | -- | $0.59 | 2.69% | -- |
|
MKAM
MKAM ETF
|
$31.22 | -- | -- | -- | $0.16 | 2.25% | -- |
|
UPAR
UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF
|
$15.70 | -- | -- | -- | $0.13 | 3.73% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NDAA
Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF
|
-- | 0.650 | -- | -- |
|
MKAM
MKAM ETF
|
-- | 0.392 | -- | -- |
|
UPAR
UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF
|
-- | 0.518 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NDAA
Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MKAM
MKAM ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
UPAR
UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns NDAA or MKAM?
MKAM ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF's net margin of --. Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat MKAM ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NDAANed Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF-- -- -- MKAMMKAM ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About NDAA or MKAM?
Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MKAM ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than MKAM ETF, analysts believe Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF is more attractive than MKAM ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NDAANed Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF0 0 0 MKAMMKAM ETF0 0 0 -
Is NDAA or MKAM More Risky?
Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MKAM ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NDAA or MKAM?
Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.69%. MKAM ETF offers a yield of 2.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MKAM ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NDAA or MKAM?
Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than MKAM ETF quarterly revenues of --. Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than MKAM ETF's net income of --. Notably, Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MKAM ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for MKAM ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NDAANed Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- MKAMMKAM ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns NDAA or UPAR?
UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF's net margin of --. Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NDAANed Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF-- -- -- UPARUPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About NDAA or UPAR?
Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF, analysts believe Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF is more attractive than UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NDAANed Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF0 0 0 UPARUPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF0 0 0 -
Is NDAA or UPAR More Risky?
Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NDAA or UPAR?
Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.69%. UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF offers a yield of 3.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NDAA or UPAR?
Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF quarterly revenues of --. Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF's net income of --. Notably, Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NDAANed Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF-- -- -- -- UPARUPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF-- -- -- --
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
80
TVTX alert for Dec 25
Travere Therapeutics, Inc. [TVTX] is up 14.03% over the past day.
Buy
68
KOD alert for Dec 25
Kodiak Sciences, Inc. [KOD] is up 13.41% over the past day.
Buy
64
ZCSH alert for Dec 25
Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) [ZCSH] is up 5.33% over the past day.
