NAMM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Core Molding Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Namib Minerals's net margin of 3.21%. Namib Minerals's return on equity of -- beat Core Molding Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.35%.

Namib Minerals has a consensus price target of $9.50, signalling upside risk potential of 813.46%. On the other hand Core Molding Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $22.00 which suggests that it could grow by 2.85%. Given that Namib Minerals has higher upside potential than Core Molding Technologies, Inc., analysts believe Namib Minerals is more attractive than Core Molding Technologies, Inc..

Namib Minerals has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Core Molding Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 0.520, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.05%.

Namib Minerals has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Core Molding Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Namib Minerals pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Core Molding Technologies, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Namib Minerals quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Core Molding Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of $58.4M. Namib Minerals's net income of -- is lower than Core Molding Technologies, Inc.'s net income of $1.9M. Notably, Namib Minerals's price-to-earnings ratio is 166.22x while Core Molding Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is 23.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Namib Minerals is 1.85x versus 0.71x for Core Molding Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Flexible Solutions International, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Namib Minerals's net margin of 3.66%. Namib Minerals's return on equity of -- beat Flexible Solutions International, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.96%.

Namib Minerals has a consensus price target of $9.50, signalling upside risk potential of 813.46%. On the other hand Flexible Solutions International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $11.0000 which suggests that it could grow by 65.17%. Given that Namib Minerals has higher upside potential than Flexible Solutions International, Inc., analysts believe Namib Minerals is more attractive than Flexible Solutions International, Inc..

Namib Minerals has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flexible Solutions International, Inc. has a beta of 1.545, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.501%.

Namib Minerals has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Flexible Solutions International, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Namib Minerals pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Flexible Solutions International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Namib Minerals quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Flexible Solutions International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $10.6M. Namib Minerals's net income of -- is lower than Flexible Solutions International, Inc.'s net income of $386.7K. Notably, Namib Minerals's price-to-earnings ratio is 166.22x while Flexible Solutions International, Inc.'s PE ratio is 45.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Namib Minerals is 1.85x versus 2.20x for Flexible Solutions International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Orion SA has a net margin of -- compared to Namib Minerals's net margin of -14.88%. Namib Minerals's return on equity of -- beat Orion SA's return on equity of -6.96%.

Namib Minerals has a consensus price target of $9.50, signalling upside risk potential of 813.46%. On the other hand Orion SA has an analysts' consensus of $6.60 which suggests that it could grow by 27.17%. Given that Namib Minerals has higher upside potential than Orion SA, analysts believe Namib Minerals is more attractive than Orion SA.

Namib Minerals has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Orion SA has a beta of 1.101, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.145%.

Namib Minerals has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Orion SA offers a yield of 1.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Namib Minerals pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Orion SA pays out 10.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Orion SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Namib Minerals quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Orion SA quarterly revenues of $450.9M. Namib Minerals's net income of -- is lower than Orion SA's net income of -$67.1M. Notably, Namib Minerals's price-to-earnings ratio is 166.22x while Orion SA's PE ratio is 16.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Namib Minerals is 1.85x versus 0.16x for Orion SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.