MRAM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

NetApp has a net margin of 18.78% compared to Everspin Technologies's net margin of 18.03%. Everspin Technologies's return on equity of 2.79% beat NetApp's return on equity of 121.65%.

Everspin Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 39.1%. On the other hand NetApp has an analysts' consensus of $138.88 which suggests that it could grow by 18.76%. Given that Everspin Technologies has higher upside potential than NetApp, analysts believe Everspin Technologies is more attractive than NetApp.

Everspin Technologies has a beta of 0.895, which suggesting that the stock is 10.503% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NetApp has a beta of 1.237, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.734%.

Everspin Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NetApp offers a yield of 1.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share. Everspin Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NetApp pays out 42.19% of its earnings as a dividend. NetApp's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Everspin Technologies quarterly revenues are $12.1M, which are smaller than NetApp quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Everspin Technologies's net income of $2.3M is lower than NetApp's net income of $299M. Notably, Everspin Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 107.83x while NetApp's PE ratio is 21.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Everspin Technologies is 2.60x versus 3.82x for NetApp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pure Storage has a net margin of 18.78% compared to Everspin Technologies's net margin of 7.66%. Everspin Technologies's return on equity of 2.79% beat Pure Storage's return on equity of 9.75%.

Everspin Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 39.1%. On the other hand Pure Storage has an analysts' consensus of $71.67 which suggests that it could grow by 11.76%. Given that Everspin Technologies has higher upside potential than Pure Storage, analysts believe Everspin Technologies is more attractive than Pure Storage.

Everspin Technologies has a beta of 0.895, which suggesting that the stock is 10.503% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pure Storage has a beta of 1.088, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.763%.

Everspin Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Pure Storage offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Everspin Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pure Storage pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Everspin Technologies quarterly revenues are $12.1M, which are smaller than Pure Storage quarterly revenues of $831.1M. Everspin Technologies's net income of $2.3M is lower than Pure Storage's net income of $63.6M. Notably, Everspin Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 107.83x while Pure Storage's PE ratio is 169.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Everspin Technologies is 2.60x versus 7.34x for Pure Storage. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Quantum has a net margin of 18.78% compared to Everspin Technologies's net margin of -19.2%. Everspin Technologies's return on equity of 2.79% beat Quantum's return on equity of --.

Everspin Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 39.1%. On the other hand Quantum has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -90.81%. Given that Everspin Technologies has higher upside potential than Quantum, analysts believe Everspin Technologies is more attractive than Quantum.

Everspin Technologies has a beta of 0.895, which suggesting that the stock is 10.503% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Quantum has a beta of 3.065, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 206.472%.

Everspin Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Quantum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Everspin Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Quantum pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Everspin Technologies quarterly revenues are $12.1M, which are smaller than Quantum quarterly revenues of $70.5M. Everspin Technologies's net income of $2.3M is higher than Quantum's net income of -$13.5M. Notably, Everspin Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 107.83x while Quantum's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Everspin Technologies is 2.60x versus 0.91x for Quantum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Western Digital has a net margin of 18.78% compared to Everspin Technologies's net margin of 12.04%. Everspin Technologies's return on equity of 2.79% beat Western Digital's return on equity of 3.4%.

Everspin Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 39.1%. On the other hand Western Digital has an analysts' consensus of $88.80 which suggests that it could grow by 38.6%. Given that Everspin Technologies has higher upside potential than Western Digital, analysts believe Everspin Technologies is more attractive than Western Digital.

Everspin Technologies has a beta of 0.895, which suggesting that the stock is 10.503% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Western Digital has a beta of 1.430, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.025%.

Everspin Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Western Digital offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Everspin Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Western Digital pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Everspin Technologies quarterly revenues are $12.1M, which are smaller than Western Digital quarterly revenues of $4.1B. Everspin Technologies's net income of $2.3M is lower than Western Digital's net income of $493M. Notably, Everspin Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 107.83x while Western Digital's PE ratio is 39.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Everspin Technologies is 2.60x versus 1.51x for Western Digital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.