MOOD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Beacon Selective Risk ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF's net margin of --. Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat Beacon Selective Risk ETF's return on equity of --.

Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Beacon Selective Risk ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than Beacon Selective Risk ETF, analysts believe Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF is more attractive than Beacon Selective Risk ETF.

Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Beacon Selective Risk ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Beacon Selective Risk ETF offers a yield of 0.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Beacon Selective Risk ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Beacon Selective Risk ETF quarterly revenues of --. Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than Beacon Selective Risk ETF's net income of --. Notably, Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Beacon Selective Risk ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for Beacon Selective Risk ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Discipline Fund ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF's net margin of --. Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat Discipline Fund ETF's return on equity of --.

Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Discipline Fund ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than Discipline Fund ETF, analysts believe Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF is more attractive than Discipline Fund ETF.

Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Discipline Fund ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Discipline Fund ETF offers a yield of 2.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Discipline Fund ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Discipline Fund ETF quarterly revenues of --. Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than Discipline Fund ETF's net income of --. Notably, Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Discipline Fund ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for Discipline Fund ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Leuthold Core ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF's net margin of --. Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF's return on equity of -- beat Leuthold Core ETF's return on equity of --.

Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Leuthold Core ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF has higher upside potential than Leuthold Core ETF, analysts believe Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF is more attractive than Leuthold Core ETF.

Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Leuthold Core ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Leuthold Core ETF offers a yield of 1.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.64 per share. Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Leuthold Core ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Leuthold Core ETF quarterly revenues of --. Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF's net income of -- is lower than Leuthold Core ETF's net income of --. Notably, Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Leuthold Core ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF is -- versus -- for Leuthold Core ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.