MOMO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

China Tower has a net margin of 13.19% compared to Hello Group, Inc.'s net margin of 11.66%. Hello Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.69% beat China Tower's return on equity of --.

Hello Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $426.82, signalling upside risk potential of 39.33%. On the other hand China Tower has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hello Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than China Tower, analysts believe Hello Group, Inc. is more attractive than China Tower.

Hello Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.331, which suggesting that the stock is 66.924% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Tower has a beta of -0.046, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 104.603%.

Hello Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. China Tower offers a yield of 48.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Hello Group, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Tower pays out 57.98% of its earnings as a dividend. China Tower's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hello Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $370.3M, which are smaller than China Tower quarterly revenues of $3.4B. Hello Group, Inc.'s net income of $48.8M is lower than China Tower's net income of $394.3M. Notably, Hello Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.65x while China Tower's PE ratio is 17.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hello Group, Inc. is 0.76x versus 186.34x for China Tower. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ZW Data Action Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of 13.19% compared to Hello Group, Inc.'s net margin of -6.29%. Hello Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.69% beat ZW Data Action Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -54.79%.

Hello Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $426.82, signalling upside risk potential of 39.33%. On the other hand ZW Data Action Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hello Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than ZW Data Action Technologies, Inc., analysts believe Hello Group, Inc. is more attractive than ZW Data Action Technologies, Inc..

Hello Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.331, which suggesting that the stock is 66.924% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ZW Data Action Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 0.876, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.371%.

Hello Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ZW Data Action Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hello Group, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ZW Data Action Technologies, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Hello Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $370.3M, which are larger than ZW Data Action Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.7M. Hello Group, Inc.'s net income of $48.8M is higher than ZW Data Action Technologies, Inc.'s net income of -$108K. Notably, Hello Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.65x while ZW Data Action Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hello Group, Inc. is 0.76x versus 0.34x for ZW Data Action Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

China Communications Services Corp. Ltd. has a net margin of 13.19% compared to Hello Group, Inc.'s net margin of --. Hello Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.69% beat China Communications Services Corp. Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.04%.

Hello Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of $426.82, signalling upside risk potential of 39.33%. On the other hand China Communications Services Corp. Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hello Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than China Communications Services Corp. Ltd., analysts believe Hello Group, Inc. is more attractive than China Communications Services Corp. Ltd..

Hello Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.331, which suggesting that the stock is 66.924% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Communications Services Corp. Ltd. has a beta of 0.567, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.313%.

Hello Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. China Communications Services Corp. Ltd. offers a yield of 4.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Hello Group, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Communications Services Corp. Ltd. pays out 42.18% of its earnings as a dividend. China Communications Services Corp. Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hello Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $370.3M, which are larger than China Communications Services Corp. Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Hello Group, Inc.'s net income of $48.8M is higher than China Communications Services Corp. Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Hello Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.65x while China Communications Services Corp. Ltd.'s PE ratio is 7.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hello Group, Inc. is 0.76x versus 0.21x for China Communications Services Corp. Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.