Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Buy
68
LOGO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$21.27
Seasonality move
:
--
Day range:
$21.24 - $21.29
52-week range:
$19.76 - $22.49
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
301
Avg. volume:
6.2K
1-year change:
--
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LOGO
Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ACGR
American Century Large Cap Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CSD
Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CVMC
Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ONEO
State Street SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SAEF
Schwab Ariel Opportunities ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LOGO
Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF
|
$21.27 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
ACGR
American Century Large Cap Growth ETF
|
$66.83 | -- | -- | -- | $0.02 | 0.11% | -- |
|
CSD
Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF
|
$102.03 | -- | -- | -- | $0.16 | 0.16% | -- |
|
CVMC
Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF
|
$65.17 | -- | -- | -- | $0.29 | 1.37% | -- |
|
ONEO
State Street SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF
|
$131.55 | -- | -- | -- | $0.45 | 1.27% | -- |
|
SAEF
Schwab Ariel Opportunities ETF
|
$27.95 | -- | -- | -- | $0.04 | 0.37% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LOGO
Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
ACGR
American Century Large Cap Growth ETF
|
-- | 1.250 | -- | -- |
|
CSD
Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF
|
-- | 1.621 | -- | -- |
|
CVMC
Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF
|
-- | 1.001 | -- | -- |
|
ONEO
State Street SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF
|
-- | 0.893 | -- | -- |
|
SAEF
Schwab Ariel Opportunities ETF
|
-- | 1.275 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LOGO
Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ACGR
American Century Large Cap Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CSD
Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CVMC
Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ONEO
State Street SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SAEF
Schwab Ariel Opportunities ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns LOGO or ACGR?
American Century Large Cap Growth ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF's net margin of --. Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF's return on equity of -- beat American Century Large Cap Growth ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LOGOAlpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF-- -- -- ACGRAmerican Century Large Cap Growth ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About LOGO or ACGR?
Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand American Century Large Cap Growth ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF has higher upside potential than American Century Large Cap Growth ETF, analysts believe Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF is more attractive than American Century Large Cap Growth ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LOGOAlpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF0 0 0 ACGRAmerican Century Large Cap Growth ETF0 0 0 -
Is LOGO or ACGR More Risky?
Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison American Century Large Cap Growth ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LOGO or ACGR?
Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. American Century Large Cap Growth ETF offers a yield of 0.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. American Century Large Cap Growth ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LOGO or ACGR?
Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than American Century Large Cap Growth ETF quarterly revenues of --. Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF's net income of -- is lower than American Century Large Cap Growth ETF's net income of --. Notably, Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while American Century Large Cap Growth ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF is -- versus -- for American Century Large Cap Growth ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LOGOAlpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF-- -- -- -- ACGRAmerican Century Large Cap Growth ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns LOGO or CSD?
Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF's net margin of --. Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LOGOAlpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF-- -- -- CSDInvesco S&P Spin-Off ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About LOGO or CSD?
Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF, analysts believe Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF is more attractive than Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LOGOAlpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF0 0 0 CSDInvesco S&P Spin-Off ETF0 0 0 -
Is LOGO or CSD More Risky?
Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF has a beta of 1.113, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.286%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LOGO or CSD?
Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF offers a yield of 0.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LOGO or CSD?
Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF quarterly revenues of --. Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF's net income of --. Notably, Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LOGOAlpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF-- -- -- -- CSDInvesco S&P Spin-Off ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns LOGO or CVMC?
Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF's net margin of --. Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF's return on equity of -- beat Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LOGOAlpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF-- -- -- CVMCCalvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About LOGO or CVMC?
Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF has higher upside potential than Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF, analysts believe Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF is more attractive than Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LOGOAlpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF0 0 0 CVMCCalvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF0 0 0 -
Is LOGO or CVMC More Risky?
Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LOGO or CVMC?
Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF offers a yield of 1.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LOGO or CVMC?
Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF quarterly revenues of --. Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF's net income of -- is lower than Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF's net income of --. Notably, Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF is -- versus -- for Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LOGOAlpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF-- -- -- -- CVMCCalvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns LOGO or ONEO?
State Street SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF's net margin of --. Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF's return on equity of -- beat State Street SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LOGOAlpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF-- -- -- ONEOState Street SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About LOGO or ONEO?
Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand State Street SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF has higher upside potential than State Street SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF, analysts believe Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF is more attractive than State Street SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LOGOAlpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF0 0 0 ONEOState Street SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF0 0 0 -
Is LOGO or ONEO More Risky?
Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison State Street SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF has a beta of 0.998, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.175%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LOGO or ONEO?
Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. State Street SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF offers a yield of 1.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. State Street SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LOGO or ONEO?
Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than State Street SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF quarterly revenues of --. Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF's net income of -- is lower than State Street SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF's net income of --. Notably, Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while State Street SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF is -- versus -- for State Street SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LOGOAlpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF-- -- -- -- ONEOState Street SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns LOGO or SAEF?
Schwab Ariel Opportunities ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF's net margin of --. Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF's return on equity of -- beat Schwab Ariel Opportunities ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LOGOAlpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF-- -- -- SAEFSchwab Ariel Opportunities ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About LOGO or SAEF?
Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Schwab Ariel Opportunities ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF has higher upside potential than Schwab Ariel Opportunities ETF, analysts believe Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF is more attractive than Schwab Ariel Opportunities ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LOGOAlpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF0 0 0 SAEFSchwab Ariel Opportunities ETF0 0 0 -
Is LOGO or SAEF More Risky?
Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Schwab Ariel Opportunities ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LOGO or SAEF?
Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Schwab Ariel Opportunities ETF offers a yield of 0.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Schwab Ariel Opportunities ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LOGO or SAEF?
Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Schwab Ariel Opportunities ETF quarterly revenues of --. Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF's net income of -- is lower than Schwab Ariel Opportunities ETF's net income of --. Notably, Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Schwab Ariel Opportunities ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF is -- versus -- for Schwab Ariel Opportunities ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LOGOAlpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF-- -- -- -- SAEFSchwab Ariel Opportunities ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
64
GLTO alert for Dec 26
Galecto, Inc. [GLTO] is up 16.92% over the past day.
Buy
80
TVTX alert for Dec 26
Travere Therapeutics, Inc. [TVTX] is down 1.54% over the past day.
Sell
27
CDNAF alert for Dec 26
Canadian Tire Corp. Ltd. [CDNAF] is down 10% over the past day.
