LMFA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP has a net margin of -170.98% compared to LM Funding America, Inc.'s net margin of 8.75%. LM Funding America, Inc.'s return on equity of -20.81% beat Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP's return on equity of 2.15%.

LM Funding America, Inc. has a consensus price target of $4.50, signalling upside risk potential of 369.73%. On the other hand Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP has an analysts' consensus of $10.50 which suggests that it could grow by 55.79%. Given that LM Funding America, Inc. has higher upside potential than Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP, analysts believe LM Funding America, Inc. is more attractive than Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP.

LM Funding America, Inc. has a beta of 1.758, which suggesting that the stock is 75.833% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP has a beta of 0.588, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.192%.

LM Funding America, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP offers a yield of 19.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. LM Funding America, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP pays out 191.07% of its earnings as a dividend.

LM Funding America, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.2M, which are smaller than Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP quarterly revenues of $22.5M. LM Funding America, Inc.'s net income of -$3.7M is lower than Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP's net income of $2M. Notably, LM Funding America, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP's PE ratio is 35.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LM Funding America, Inc. is 0.68x versus 1.59x for Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Jernigan Capital has a net margin of -170.98% compared to LM Funding America, Inc.'s net margin of --. LM Funding America, Inc.'s return on equity of -20.81% beat Jernigan Capital's return on equity of --.

LM Funding America, Inc. has a consensus price target of $4.50, signalling upside risk potential of 369.73%. On the other hand Jernigan Capital has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that LM Funding America, Inc. has higher upside potential than Jernigan Capital, analysts believe LM Funding America, Inc. is more attractive than Jernigan Capital.

LM Funding America, Inc. has a beta of 1.758, which suggesting that the stock is 75.833% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jernigan Capital has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

LM Funding America, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Jernigan Capital offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. LM Funding America, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Jernigan Capital pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

LM Funding America, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.2M, which are larger than Jernigan Capital quarterly revenues of --. LM Funding America, Inc.'s net income of -$3.7M is higher than Jernigan Capital's net income of --. Notably, LM Funding America, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Jernigan Capital's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LM Funding America, Inc. is 0.68x versus -- for Jernigan Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Navient Corp. has a net margin of -170.98% compared to LM Funding America, Inc.'s net margin of -10.75%. LM Funding America, Inc.'s return on equity of -20.81% beat Navient Corp.'s return on equity of -1.93%.

LM Funding America, Inc. has a consensus price target of $4.50, signalling upside risk potential of 369.73%. On the other hand Navient Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $12.89 which suggests that it could grow by 2.29%. Given that LM Funding America, Inc. has higher upside potential than Navient Corp., analysts believe LM Funding America, Inc. is more attractive than Navient Corp..

LM Funding America, Inc. has a beta of 1.758, which suggesting that the stock is 75.833% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Navient Corp. has a beta of 1.308, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.848%.

LM Funding America, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Navient Corp. offers a yield of 5.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. LM Funding America, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Navient Corp. pays out 54.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Navient Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

LM Funding America, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.2M, which are smaller than Navient Corp. quarterly revenues of $800M. LM Funding America, Inc.'s net income of -$3.7M is higher than Navient Corp.'s net income of -$86M. Notably, LM Funding America, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Navient Corp.'s PE ratio is 36.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LM Funding America, Inc. is 0.68x versus 0.38x for Navient Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PayPal Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -170.98% compared to LM Funding America, Inc.'s net margin of 14.74%. LM Funding America, Inc.'s return on equity of -20.81% beat PayPal Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 24.28%.

LM Funding America, Inc. has a consensus price target of $4.50, signalling upside risk potential of 369.73%. On the other hand PayPal Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $82.75 which suggests that it could grow by 35.13%. Given that LM Funding America, Inc. has higher upside potential than PayPal Holdings, Inc., analysts believe LM Funding America, Inc. is more attractive than PayPal Holdings, Inc..

LM Funding America, Inc. has a beta of 1.758, which suggesting that the stock is 75.833% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PayPal Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.433, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.336%.

LM Funding America, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PayPal Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. LM Funding America, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PayPal Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

LM Funding America, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.2M, which are smaller than PayPal Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $8.5B. LM Funding America, Inc.'s net income of -$3.7M is lower than PayPal Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $1.2B. Notably, LM Funding America, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while PayPal Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 12.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LM Funding America, Inc. is 0.68x versus 1.84x for PayPal Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.