LFLY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Digital Ally has a net margin of -13.64% compared to Leafly Holdings's net margin of -85.66%. Leafly Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Digital Ally's return on equity of -259.6%.

Leafly Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 357.23%. On the other hand Digital Ally has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2344.44%. Given that Digital Ally has higher upside potential than Leafly Holdings, analysts believe Digital Ally is more attractive than Leafly Holdings.

Leafly Holdings has a beta of 0.871, which suggesting that the stock is 12.852% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Digital Ally has a beta of 0.895, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.53%.

Leafly Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Digital Ally offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Leafly Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Digital Ally pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Leafly Holdings quarterly revenues are $8.4M, which are larger than Digital Ally quarterly revenues of $4.1M. Leafly Holdings's net income of -$1.1M is higher than Digital Ally's net income of -$3.5M. Notably, Leafly Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Digital Ally's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Leafly Holdings is 0.11x versus 0.07x for Digital Ally. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Alphabet has a net margin of -13.64% compared to Leafly Holdings's net margin of 29.8%. Leafly Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Alphabet's return on equity of 32.19%.

Leafly Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 357.23%. On the other hand Alphabet has an analysts' consensus of $211.35 which suggests that it could grow by 7.36%. Given that Leafly Holdings has higher upside potential than Alphabet, analysts believe Leafly Holdings is more attractive than Alphabet.

Leafly Holdings has a beta of 0.871, which suggesting that the stock is 12.852% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Alphabet has a beta of 0.980, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.965%.

Leafly Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Alphabet offers a yield of 0.31% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Leafly Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alphabet pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Leafly Holdings quarterly revenues are $8.4M, which are smaller than Alphabet quarterly revenues of $88.3B. Leafly Holdings's net income of -$1.1M is lower than Alphabet's net income of $26.3B. Notably, Leafly Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Alphabet's PE ratio is 26.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Leafly Holdings is 0.11x versus 7.37x for Alphabet. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TrueCar has a net margin of -13.64% compared to Leafly Holdings's net margin of -12.53%. Leafly Holdings's return on equity of -- beat TrueCar's return on equity of -18.12%.

Leafly Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 357.23%. On the other hand TrueCar has an analysts' consensus of $3.83 which suggests that it could grow by 34.94%. Given that Leafly Holdings has higher upside potential than TrueCar, analysts believe Leafly Holdings is more attractive than TrueCar.

Leafly Holdings has a beta of 0.871, which suggesting that the stock is 12.852% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TrueCar has a beta of 1.780, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.967%.

Leafly Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TrueCar offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Leafly Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TrueCar pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Leafly Holdings quarterly revenues are $8.4M, which are smaller than TrueCar quarterly revenues of $46.5M. Leafly Holdings's net income of -$1.1M is higher than TrueCar's net income of -$5.8M. Notably, Leafly Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while TrueCar's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Leafly Holdings is 0.11x versus 1.88x for TrueCar. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zillow Group has a net margin of -13.64% compared to Leafly Holdings's net margin of -3.44%. Leafly Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Zillow Group's return on equity of -2.91%.

Leafly Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 357.23%. On the other hand Zillow Group has an analysts' consensus of $78.37 which suggests that it could grow by 8.63%. Given that Leafly Holdings has higher upside potential than Zillow Group, analysts believe Leafly Holdings is more attractive than Zillow Group.

Leafly Holdings has a beta of 0.871, which suggesting that the stock is 12.852% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zillow Group has a beta of 2.086, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 108.572%.

Leafly Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zillow Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Leafly Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zillow Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Leafly Holdings quarterly revenues are $8.4M, which are smaller than Zillow Group quarterly revenues of $581M. Leafly Holdings's net income of -$1.1M is higher than Zillow Group's net income of -$20M. Notably, Leafly Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Zillow Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Leafly Holdings is 0.11x versus 7.77x for Zillow Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.