LAMR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Equinix has a net margin of 27.45% compared to Lamar Advertising's net margin of 15.42%. Lamar Advertising's return on equity of 37.22% beat Equinix's return on equity of 7.05%.

Lamar Advertising has a consensus price target of $125.00, signalling upside risk potential of 8.85%. On the other hand Equinix has an analysts' consensus of $1,011.27 which suggests that it could grow by 16.99%. Given that Equinix has higher upside potential than Lamar Advertising, analysts believe Equinix is more attractive than Lamar Advertising.

Lamar Advertising has a beta of 1.379, which suggesting that the stock is 37.929% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Equinix has a beta of 0.975, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.508%.

Lamar Advertising has a quarterly dividend of $1.55 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.92%. Equinix offers a yield of 2.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $4.69 per share. Lamar Advertising pays 160.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Equinix pays out 201.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lamar Advertising quarterly revenues are $505.4M, which are smaller than Equinix quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Lamar Advertising's net income of $138.8M is lower than Equinix's net income of $343M. Notably, Lamar Advertising's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.87x while Equinix's PE ratio is 89.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lamar Advertising is 5.32x versus 9.43x for Equinix. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Innovative Industrial Properties has a net margin of 27.45% compared to Lamar Advertising's net margin of 52.15%. Lamar Advertising's return on equity of 37.22% beat Innovative Industrial Properties's return on equity of 8.3%.

Lamar Advertising has a consensus price target of $125.00, signalling upside risk potential of 8.85%. On the other hand Innovative Industrial Properties has an analysts' consensus of $67.17 which suggests that it could grow by 22.99%. Given that Innovative Industrial Properties has higher upside potential than Lamar Advertising, analysts believe Innovative Industrial Properties is more attractive than Lamar Advertising.

Lamar Advertising has a beta of 1.379, which suggesting that the stock is 37.929% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Innovative Industrial Properties has a beta of 1.724, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.39%.

Lamar Advertising has a quarterly dividend of $1.55 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.92%. Innovative Industrial Properties offers a yield of 13.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.90 per share. Lamar Advertising pays 160.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Innovative Industrial Properties pays out 132.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lamar Advertising quarterly revenues are $505.4M, which are larger than Innovative Industrial Properties quarterly revenues of $76.7M. Lamar Advertising's net income of $138.8M is higher than Innovative Industrial Properties's net income of $40M. Notably, Lamar Advertising's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.87x while Innovative Industrial Properties's PE ratio is 9.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lamar Advertising is 5.32x versus 5.05x for Innovative Industrial Properties. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Invitation Homes has a net margin of 27.45% compared to Lamar Advertising's net margin of 24.57%. Lamar Advertising's return on equity of 37.22% beat Invitation Homes's return on equity of 4.8%.

Lamar Advertising has a consensus price target of $125.00, signalling upside risk potential of 8.85%. On the other hand Invitation Homes has an analysts' consensus of $37.45 which suggests that it could grow by 7.72%. Given that Lamar Advertising has higher upside potential than Invitation Homes, analysts believe Lamar Advertising is more attractive than Invitation Homes.

Lamar Advertising has a beta of 1.379, which suggesting that the stock is 37.929% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invitation Homes has a beta of 0.867, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.257%.

Lamar Advertising has a quarterly dividend of $1.55 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.92%. Invitation Homes offers a yield of 3.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Lamar Advertising pays 160.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Invitation Homes pays out 151.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lamar Advertising quarterly revenues are $505.4M, which are smaller than Invitation Homes quarterly revenues of $674.5M. Lamar Advertising's net income of $138.8M is lower than Invitation Homes's net income of $165.7M. Notably, Lamar Advertising's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.87x while Invitation Homes's PE ratio is 45.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lamar Advertising is 5.32x versus 8.06x for Invitation Homes. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PotlatchDeltic has a net margin of 27.45% compared to Lamar Advertising's net margin of 9.62%. Lamar Advertising's return on equity of 37.22% beat PotlatchDeltic's return on equity of 2.32%.

Lamar Advertising has a consensus price target of $125.00, signalling upside risk potential of 8.85%. On the other hand PotlatchDeltic has an analysts' consensus of $49.56 which suggests that it could grow by 29.73%. Given that PotlatchDeltic has higher upside potential than Lamar Advertising, analysts believe PotlatchDeltic is more attractive than Lamar Advertising.

Lamar Advertising has a beta of 1.379, which suggesting that the stock is 37.929% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PotlatchDeltic has a beta of 1.167, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.72%.

Lamar Advertising has a quarterly dividend of $1.55 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.92%. PotlatchDeltic offers a yield of 4.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Lamar Advertising pays 160.06% of its earnings as a dividend. PotlatchDeltic pays out 650.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lamar Advertising quarterly revenues are $505.4M, which are larger than PotlatchDeltic quarterly revenues of $268.3M. Lamar Advertising's net income of $138.8M is higher than PotlatchDeltic's net income of $25.8M. Notably, Lamar Advertising's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.87x while PotlatchDeltic's PE ratio is 62.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lamar Advertising is 5.32x versus 2.75x for PotlatchDeltic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.