IRON Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

NovaBay Pharmaceuticals has a net margin of -- compared to Disc Medicine's net margin of -49.65%. Disc Medicine's return on equity of -- beat NovaBay Pharmaceuticals's return on equity of -461.38%.

Disc Medicine has a consensus price target of $93.55, signalling upside risk potential of 46.6%. On the other hand NovaBay Pharmaceuticals has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 620.92%. Given that NovaBay Pharmaceuticals has higher upside potential than Disc Medicine, analysts believe NovaBay Pharmaceuticals is more attractive than Disc Medicine.

Disc Medicine has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NovaBay Pharmaceuticals has a beta of 0.686, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.383%.

Disc Medicine has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NovaBay Pharmaceuticals offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Disc Medicine pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NovaBay Pharmaceuticals pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Disc Medicine quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than NovaBay Pharmaceuticals quarterly revenues of $2.4M. Disc Medicine's net income of -$26.6M is lower than NovaBay Pharmaceuticals's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Disc Medicine's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NovaBay Pharmaceuticals's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Disc Medicine is -- versus 0.06x for NovaBay Pharmaceuticals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oragenics has a net margin of -- compared to Disc Medicine's net margin of --. Disc Medicine's return on equity of -- beat Oragenics's return on equity of --.

Disc Medicine has a consensus price target of $93.55, signalling upside risk potential of 46.6%. On the other hand Oragenics has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 24523.8%. Given that Oragenics has higher upside potential than Disc Medicine, analysts believe Oragenics is more attractive than Disc Medicine.

Disc Medicine has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oragenics has a beta of 0.434, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.551%.

Disc Medicine has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Oragenics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Disc Medicine pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oragenics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Disc Medicine quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Oragenics quarterly revenues of --. Disc Medicine's net income of -$26.6M is lower than Oragenics's net income of -$2.5M. Notably, Disc Medicine's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Oragenics's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Disc Medicine is -- versus 1.44x for Oragenics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Palatin Technologies has a net margin of -- compared to Disc Medicine's net margin of -2357.27%. Disc Medicine's return on equity of -- beat Palatin Technologies's return on equity of --.

Disc Medicine has a consensus price target of $93.55, signalling upside risk potential of 46.6%. On the other hand Palatin Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1652.58%. Given that Palatin Technologies has higher upside potential than Disc Medicine, analysts believe Palatin Technologies is more attractive than Disc Medicine.

Disc Medicine has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Palatin Technologies has a beta of 0.901, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.9%.

Disc Medicine has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Palatin Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Disc Medicine pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Palatin Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Disc Medicine quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Palatin Technologies quarterly revenues of $350K. Disc Medicine's net income of -$26.6M is lower than Palatin Technologies's net income of -$7.8M. Notably, Disc Medicine's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Palatin Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Disc Medicine is -- versus -- for Palatin Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Theriva Biologics has a net margin of -- compared to Disc Medicine's net margin of --. Disc Medicine's return on equity of -- beat Theriva Biologics's return on equity of --.

Disc Medicine has a consensus price target of $93.55, signalling upside risk potential of 46.6%. On the other hand Theriva Biologics has an analysts' consensus of $100.00 which suggests that it could grow by 6861.54%. Given that Theriva Biologics has higher upside potential than Disc Medicine, analysts believe Theriva Biologics is more attractive than Disc Medicine.

Disc Medicine has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Theriva Biologics has a beta of 1.329, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.874%.

Disc Medicine has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Theriva Biologics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Disc Medicine pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Theriva Biologics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Disc Medicine quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Theriva Biologics quarterly revenues of --. Disc Medicine's net income of -$26.6M is lower than Theriva Biologics's net income of -$7.7M. Notably, Disc Medicine's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Theriva Biologics's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Disc Medicine is -- versus 0.90x for Theriva Biologics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.