Financhill
Sell
28

INM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$2.34
Seasonality move :
-19.46%
Day range:
$2.33 - $2.45
52-week range:
$1.72 - $15.70
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
0.28x
P/B ratio:
0.46x
Volume:
16.1K
Avg. volume:
45.1K
1-year change:
-57.25%
Market cap:
$2.8M
Revenue:
$4.6M
EPS (TTM):
-$13.75

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
INM
InMed Pharmaceuticals
$1.5M -- 44.01% -- --
AUPH
Aurinia Pharmaceuticals
$61.1M $0.10 12.73% 1025% $9.83
EDSA
Edesa Biotech
-- -- -- -- $19.00
EPIX
ESSA Pharma
-- -$0.19 -- -54.86% $1.68
LEXX
Lexaria Bioscience
$91.3K -- 107.14% -- $7.00
XENE
Xenon Pharmaceuticals
$1.9M -$0.90 -- -31.27% $57.18
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
INM
InMed Pharmaceuticals
$2.35 -- $2.8M -- $0.00 0% 0.28x
AUPH
Aurinia Pharmaceuticals
$8.00 $9.83 $1.1B 160.00x $0.00 0% 4.96x
EDSA
Edesa Biotech
$2.05 $19.00 $14.4M -- $0.00 0% 20.23x
EPIX
ESSA Pharma
$1.72 $1.68 $76.3M -- $0.00 0% --
LEXX
Lexaria Bioscience
$1.08 $7.00 $21.1M -- $0.00 0% 32.73x
XENE
Xenon Pharmaceuticals
$35.02 $57.18 $2.7B -- $0.00 0% 207.11x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
INM
InMed Pharmaceuticals
-- 0.378 -- 2.06x
AUPH
Aurinia Pharmaceuticals
-- 1.242 -- 4.04x
EDSA
Edesa Biotech
-- -0.678 -- --
EPIX
ESSA Pharma
-- -2.507 -- --
LEXX
Lexaria Bioscience
-- 0.015 -- 3.77x
XENE
Xenon Pharmaceuticals
-- 0.566 -- --
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
INM
InMed Pharmaceuticals
$460.9K -$2.2M -83.02% -83.02% -200.01% -$2.5M
AUPH
Aurinia Pharmaceuticals
$54.3M $13.7M 1.54% 1.54% 3.87% $30.1M
EDSA
Edesa Biotech
-- -$1.6M -- -- -- -$1.5M
EPIX
ESSA Pharma
-- -$9.9M -- -- -- -$6.5M
LEXX
Lexaria Bioscience
$174K -$2.8M -118.15% -118.15% -1581.04% -$1.5M
XENE
Xenon Pharmaceuticals
-- -$77.5M -- -- -- -$55.2M

InMed Pharmaceuticals vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns INM or AUPH?

    Aurinia Pharmaceuticals has a net margin of -231.63% compared to InMed Pharmaceuticals's net margin of 2.39%. InMed Pharmaceuticals's return on equity of -83.02% beat Aurinia Pharmaceuticals's return on equity of 1.54%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    INM
    InMed Pharmaceuticals
    41.46% -$3.64 $6.2M
    AUPH
    Aurinia Pharmaceuticals
    90.73% $0.01 $377.5M
  • What do Analysts Say About INM or AUPH?

    InMed Pharmaceuticals has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 17359.28%. On the other hand Aurinia Pharmaceuticals has an analysts' consensus of $9.83 which suggests that it could grow by 22.92%. Given that InMed Pharmaceuticals has higher upside potential than Aurinia Pharmaceuticals, analysts believe InMed Pharmaceuticals is more attractive than Aurinia Pharmaceuticals.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    INM
    InMed Pharmaceuticals
    0 0 0
    AUPH
    Aurinia Pharmaceuticals
    3 1 0
  • Is INM or AUPH More Risky?

    InMed Pharmaceuticals has a beta of 0.477, which suggesting that the stock is 52.253% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Aurinia Pharmaceuticals has a beta of 1.160, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.034%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock INM or AUPH?

    InMed Pharmaceuticals has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Aurinia Pharmaceuticals offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. InMed Pharmaceuticals pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Aurinia Pharmaceuticals pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios INM or AUPH?

    InMed Pharmaceuticals quarterly revenues are $1.1M, which are smaller than Aurinia Pharmaceuticals quarterly revenues of $59.9M. InMed Pharmaceuticals's net income of -$2.6M is lower than Aurinia Pharmaceuticals's net income of $1.4M. Notably, InMed Pharmaceuticals's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Aurinia Pharmaceuticals's PE ratio is 160.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for InMed Pharmaceuticals is 0.28x versus 4.96x for Aurinia Pharmaceuticals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    INM
    InMed Pharmaceuticals
    0.28x -- $1.1M -$2.6M
    AUPH
    Aurinia Pharmaceuticals
    4.96x 160.00x $59.9M $1.4M
  • Which has Higher Returns INM or EDSA?

    Edesa Biotech has a net margin of -231.63% compared to InMed Pharmaceuticals's net margin of --. InMed Pharmaceuticals's return on equity of -83.02% beat Edesa Biotech's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    INM
    InMed Pharmaceuticals
    41.46% -$3.64 $6.2M
    EDSA
    Edesa Biotech
    -- -$0.48 --
  • What do Analysts Say About INM or EDSA?

    InMed Pharmaceuticals has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 17359.28%. On the other hand Edesa Biotech has an analysts' consensus of $19.00 which suggests that it could grow by 829.1%. Given that InMed Pharmaceuticals has higher upside potential than Edesa Biotech, analysts believe InMed Pharmaceuticals is more attractive than Edesa Biotech.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    INM
    InMed Pharmaceuticals
    0 0 0
    EDSA
    Edesa Biotech
    0 0 0
  • Is INM or EDSA More Risky?

    InMed Pharmaceuticals has a beta of 0.477, which suggesting that the stock is 52.253% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Edesa Biotech has a beta of 0.547, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.291%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock INM or EDSA?

    InMed Pharmaceuticals has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Edesa Biotech offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. InMed Pharmaceuticals pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Edesa Biotech pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios INM or EDSA?

    InMed Pharmaceuticals quarterly revenues are $1.1M, which are larger than Edesa Biotech quarterly revenues of --. InMed Pharmaceuticals's net income of -$2.6M is lower than Edesa Biotech's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, InMed Pharmaceuticals's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Edesa Biotech's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for InMed Pharmaceuticals is 0.28x versus 20.23x for Edesa Biotech. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    INM
    InMed Pharmaceuticals
    0.28x -- $1.1M -$2.6M
    EDSA
    Edesa Biotech
    20.23x -- -- -$1.6M
  • Which has Higher Returns INM or EPIX?

    ESSA Pharma has a net margin of -231.63% compared to InMed Pharmaceuticals's net margin of --. InMed Pharmaceuticals's return on equity of -83.02% beat ESSA Pharma's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    INM
    InMed Pharmaceuticals
    41.46% -$3.64 $6.2M
    EPIX
    ESSA Pharma
    -- -$0.19 --
  • What do Analysts Say About INM or EPIX?

    InMed Pharmaceuticals has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 17359.28%. On the other hand ESSA Pharma has an analysts' consensus of $1.68 which suggests that it could fall by -2.25%. Given that InMed Pharmaceuticals has higher upside potential than ESSA Pharma, analysts believe InMed Pharmaceuticals is more attractive than ESSA Pharma.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    INM
    InMed Pharmaceuticals
    0 0 0
    EPIX
    ESSA Pharma
    0 2 0
  • Is INM or EPIX More Risky?

    InMed Pharmaceuticals has a beta of 0.477, which suggesting that the stock is 52.253% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ESSA Pharma has a beta of 1.686, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.618%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock INM or EPIX?

    InMed Pharmaceuticals has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ESSA Pharma offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. InMed Pharmaceuticals pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ESSA Pharma pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios INM or EPIX?

    InMed Pharmaceuticals quarterly revenues are $1.1M, which are larger than ESSA Pharma quarterly revenues of --. InMed Pharmaceuticals's net income of -$2.6M is higher than ESSA Pharma's net income of -$8.5M. Notably, InMed Pharmaceuticals's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ESSA Pharma's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for InMed Pharmaceuticals is 0.28x versus -- for ESSA Pharma. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    INM
    InMed Pharmaceuticals
    0.28x -- $1.1M -$2.6M
    EPIX
    ESSA Pharma
    -- -- -- -$8.5M
  • Which has Higher Returns INM or LEXX?

    Lexaria Bioscience has a net margin of -231.63% compared to InMed Pharmaceuticals's net margin of -1559.32%. InMed Pharmaceuticals's return on equity of -83.02% beat Lexaria Bioscience's return on equity of -118.15%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    INM
    InMed Pharmaceuticals
    41.46% -$3.64 $6.2M
    LEXX
    Lexaria Bioscience
    98.52% -$0.15 $6.8M
  • What do Analysts Say About INM or LEXX?

    InMed Pharmaceuticals has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 17359.28%. On the other hand Lexaria Bioscience has an analysts' consensus of $7.00 which suggests that it could grow by 548.15%. Given that InMed Pharmaceuticals has higher upside potential than Lexaria Bioscience, analysts believe InMed Pharmaceuticals is more attractive than Lexaria Bioscience.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    INM
    InMed Pharmaceuticals
    0 0 0
    LEXX
    Lexaria Bioscience
    0 0 0
  • Is INM or LEXX More Risky?

    InMed Pharmaceuticals has a beta of 0.477, which suggesting that the stock is 52.253% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lexaria Bioscience has a beta of 1.008, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.806%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock INM or LEXX?

    InMed Pharmaceuticals has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lexaria Bioscience offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. InMed Pharmaceuticals pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lexaria Bioscience pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios INM or LEXX?

    InMed Pharmaceuticals quarterly revenues are $1.1M, which are larger than Lexaria Bioscience quarterly revenues of $174K. InMed Pharmaceuticals's net income of -$2.6M is higher than Lexaria Bioscience's net income of -$2.7M. Notably, InMed Pharmaceuticals's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lexaria Bioscience's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for InMed Pharmaceuticals is 0.28x versus 32.73x for Lexaria Bioscience. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    INM
    InMed Pharmaceuticals
    0.28x -- $1.1M -$2.6M
    LEXX
    Lexaria Bioscience
    32.73x -- $174K -$2.7M
  • Which has Higher Returns INM or XENE?

    Xenon Pharmaceuticals has a net margin of -231.63% compared to InMed Pharmaceuticals's net margin of --. InMed Pharmaceuticals's return on equity of -83.02% beat Xenon Pharmaceuticals's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    INM
    InMed Pharmaceuticals
    41.46% -$3.64 $6.2M
    XENE
    Xenon Pharmaceuticals
    -- -$0.84 --
  • What do Analysts Say About INM or XENE?

    InMed Pharmaceuticals has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 17359.28%. On the other hand Xenon Pharmaceuticals has an analysts' consensus of $57.18 which suggests that it could grow by 63.27%. Given that InMed Pharmaceuticals has higher upside potential than Xenon Pharmaceuticals, analysts believe InMed Pharmaceuticals is more attractive than Xenon Pharmaceuticals.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    INM
    InMed Pharmaceuticals
    0 0 0
    XENE
    Xenon Pharmaceuticals
    13 0 0
  • Is INM or XENE More Risky?

    InMed Pharmaceuticals has a beta of 0.477, which suggesting that the stock is 52.253% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xenon Pharmaceuticals has a beta of 1.212, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.174%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock INM or XENE?

    InMed Pharmaceuticals has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Xenon Pharmaceuticals offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. InMed Pharmaceuticals pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Xenon Pharmaceuticals pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios INM or XENE?

    InMed Pharmaceuticals quarterly revenues are $1.1M, which are larger than Xenon Pharmaceuticals quarterly revenues of --. InMed Pharmaceuticals's net income of -$2.6M is higher than Xenon Pharmaceuticals's net income of -$65.7M. Notably, InMed Pharmaceuticals's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Xenon Pharmaceuticals's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for InMed Pharmaceuticals is 0.28x versus 207.11x for Xenon Pharmaceuticals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    INM
    InMed Pharmaceuticals
    0.28x -- $1.1M -$2.6M
    XENE
    Xenon Pharmaceuticals
    207.11x -- -- -$65.7M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is Spotify a Millionaire-Maker Stock?
Is Spotify a Millionaire-Maker Stock?

Spotify (NYSE:SPOT) may seem like an expensive proposition trading closer…

What Is a Millionaire-Maker Stock?
What Is a Millionaire-Maker Stock?

From time to time, investors will run across the term…

5 Investors to Follow Other Than Warren Buffett
5 Investors to Follow Other Than Warren Buffett

There is no doubt that Warren Buffett is one of…

Stock Ideas

Buy
68
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Sell
39
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x

Buy
61
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.8T
P/E Ratio: 40x

Alerts

Buy
60
RGC alert for May 10

Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 79.25% over the past day.

Buy
97
NGVC alert for May 10

Natural Grocers by Vitamin Cottage [NGVC] is up 30.26% over the past day.

Sell
38
ONTO alert for May 10

Onto Innovation [ONTO] is down 30.17% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock