IHRT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cumulus Media, Inc. has a net margin of -6.6% compared to iHeartMedia, Inc.'s net margin of -11.32%. iHeartMedia, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Cumulus Media, Inc.'s return on equity of -1187.81%.

iHeartMedia, Inc. has a consensus price target of $4.25, signalling upside risk potential of 33.23%. On the other hand Cumulus Media, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $4.00 which suggests that it could grow by 14139.48%. Given that Cumulus Media, Inc. has higher upside potential than iHeartMedia, Inc., analysts believe Cumulus Media, Inc. is more attractive than iHeartMedia, Inc..

iHeartMedia, Inc. has a beta of 1.699, which suggesting that the stock is 69.943% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cumulus Media, Inc. has a beta of -0.465, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 146.498%.

iHeartMedia, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cumulus Media, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. iHeartMedia, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cumulus Media, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

iHeartMedia, Inc. quarterly revenues are $997M, which are larger than Cumulus Media, Inc. quarterly revenues of $180.3M. iHeartMedia, Inc.'s net income of -$65.8M is lower than Cumulus Media, Inc.'s net income of -$20.4M. Notably, iHeartMedia, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cumulus Media, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iHeartMedia, Inc. is 0.13x versus 0.00x for Cumulus Media, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Salem Media Group, Inc. has a net margin of -6.6% compared to iHeartMedia, Inc.'s net margin of -4.48%. iHeartMedia, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Salem Media Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -0.77%.

iHeartMedia, Inc. has a consensus price target of $4.25, signalling upside risk potential of 33.23%. On the other hand Salem Media Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 936.59%. Given that Salem Media Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than iHeartMedia, Inc., analysts believe Salem Media Group, Inc. is more attractive than iHeartMedia, Inc..

iHeartMedia, Inc. has a beta of 1.699, which suggesting that the stock is 69.943% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Salem Media Group, Inc. has a beta of -0.501, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 150.099%.

iHeartMedia, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Salem Media Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. iHeartMedia, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Salem Media Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

iHeartMedia, Inc. quarterly revenues are $997M, which are larger than Salem Media Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $51.3M. iHeartMedia, Inc.'s net income of -$65.8M is lower than Salem Media Group, Inc.'s net income of -$2.3M. Notably, iHeartMedia, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Salem Media Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 6.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iHeartMedia, Inc. is 0.13x versus 0.06x for Salem Media Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Saga Communications, Inc. has a net margin of -6.6% compared to iHeartMedia, Inc.'s net margin of -1.79%. iHeartMedia, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Saga Communications, Inc.'s return on equity of 0.18%.

iHeartMedia, Inc. has a consensus price target of $4.25, signalling upside risk potential of 33.23%. On the other hand Saga Communications, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $18.00 which suggests that it could grow by 52.67%. Given that Saga Communications, Inc. has higher upside potential than iHeartMedia, Inc., analysts believe Saga Communications, Inc. is more attractive than iHeartMedia, Inc..

iHeartMedia, Inc. has a beta of 1.699, which suggesting that the stock is 69.943% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Saga Communications, Inc. has a beta of -0.021, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 102.092%.

iHeartMedia, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Saga Communications, Inc. offers a yield of 8.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. iHeartMedia, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Saga Communications, Inc. pays out 181.39% of its earnings as a dividend.

iHeartMedia, Inc. quarterly revenues are $997M, which are larger than Saga Communications, Inc. quarterly revenues of $28.2M. iHeartMedia, Inc.'s net income of -$65.8M is lower than Saga Communications, Inc.'s net income of -$504K. Notably, iHeartMedia, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Saga Communications, Inc.'s PE ratio is 238.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iHeartMedia, Inc. is 0.13x versus 0.66x for Saga Communications, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The E.W. Scripps Co. has a net margin of -6.6% compared to iHeartMedia, Inc.'s net margin of -5.09%. iHeartMedia, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat The E.W. Scripps Co.'s return on equity of -7.84%.

iHeartMedia, Inc. has a consensus price target of $4.25, signalling upside risk potential of 33.23%. On the other hand The E.W. Scripps Co. has an analysts' consensus of $7.30 which suggests that it could grow by 97.83%. Given that The E.W. Scripps Co. has higher upside potential than iHeartMedia, Inc., analysts believe The E.W. Scripps Co. is more attractive than iHeartMedia, Inc..

iHeartMedia, Inc. has a beta of 1.699, which suggesting that the stock is 69.943% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The E.W. Scripps Co. has a beta of 0.617, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.334%.

iHeartMedia, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The E.W. Scripps Co. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. iHeartMedia, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The E.W. Scripps Co. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

iHeartMedia, Inc. quarterly revenues are $997M, which are larger than The E.W. Scripps Co. quarterly revenues of $560.3M. iHeartMedia, Inc.'s net income of -$65.8M is lower than The E.W. Scripps Co.'s net income of -$28.5M. Notably, iHeartMedia, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while The E.W. Scripps Co.'s PE ratio is 4.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iHeartMedia, Inc. is 0.13x versus 0.15x for The E.W. Scripps Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.