ICON Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Euroseas has a net margin of -49.25% compared to Icon Energy's net margin of 51.03%. Icon Energy's return on equity of 4.26% beat Euroseas's return on equity of 38.8%.

Icon Energy has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 191.26%. On the other hand Euroseas has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 73.56%. Given that Icon Energy has higher upside potential than Euroseas, analysts believe Icon Energy is more attractive than Euroseas.

Icon Energy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Euroseas has a beta of 0.886, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.365%.

Icon Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.01%. Euroseas offers a yield of 6.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share. Icon Energy pays 286.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Euroseas pays out 12.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Euroseas's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Icon Energy's is not.

Icon Energy quarterly revenues are $863K, which are smaller than Euroseas quarterly revenues of $54.1M. Icon Energy's net income of -$425K is lower than Euroseas's net income of $27.6M. Notably, Icon Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.27x while Euroseas's PE ratio is 2.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Icon Energy is 0.69x versus 1.19x for Euroseas. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

StealthGas has a net margin of -49.25% compared to Icon Energy's net margin of 30.03%. Icon Energy's return on equity of 4.26% beat StealthGas's return on equity of 11.23%.

Icon Energy has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 191.26%. On the other hand StealthGas has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 96.46%. Given that Icon Energy has higher upside potential than StealthGas, analysts believe Icon Energy is more attractive than StealthGas.

Icon Energy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison StealthGas has a beta of 0.799, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.123%.

Icon Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.01%. StealthGas offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Icon Energy pays 286.32% of its earnings as a dividend. StealthGas pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Icon Energy quarterly revenues are $863K, which are smaller than StealthGas quarterly revenues of $40.4M. Icon Energy's net income of -$425K is lower than StealthGas's net income of $12.1M. Notably, Icon Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.27x while StealthGas's PE ratio is 2.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Icon Energy is 0.69x versus 1.14x for StealthGas. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Star Bulk Carriers has a net margin of -49.25% compared to Icon Energy's net margin of 23.61%. Icon Energy's return on equity of 4.26% beat Star Bulk Carriers's return on equity of 14.89%.

Icon Energy has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 191.26%. On the other hand Star Bulk Carriers has an analysts' consensus of $26.44 which suggests that it could grow by 74.87%. Given that Icon Energy has higher upside potential than Star Bulk Carriers, analysts believe Icon Energy is more attractive than Star Bulk Carriers.

Icon Energy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Star Bulk Carriers has a beta of 0.970, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.013%.

Icon Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.01%. Star Bulk Carriers offers a yield of 16.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share. Icon Energy pays 286.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Star Bulk Carriers pays out 91.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Star Bulk Carriers's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Icon Energy's is not.

Icon Energy quarterly revenues are $863K, which are smaller than Star Bulk Carriers quarterly revenues of $344.3M. Icon Energy's net income of -$425K is lower than Star Bulk Carriers's net income of $81.3M. Notably, Icon Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.27x while Star Bulk Carriers's PE ratio is 5.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Icon Energy is 0.69x versus 1.25x for Star Bulk Carriers. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seanergy Maritime Holdings has a net margin of -49.25% compared to Icon Energy's net margin of 28.29%. Icon Energy's return on equity of 4.26% beat Seanergy Maritime Holdings's return on equity of 19.6%.

Icon Energy has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 191.26%. On the other hand Seanergy Maritime Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 102.23%. Given that Icon Energy has higher upside potential than Seanergy Maritime Holdings, analysts believe Icon Energy is more attractive than Seanergy Maritime Holdings.

Icon Energy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seanergy Maritime Holdings has a beta of 0.642, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.793%.

Icon Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.01%. Seanergy Maritime Holdings offers a yield of 4.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Icon Energy pays 286.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Seanergy Maritime Holdings pays out 264.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Icon Energy quarterly revenues are $863K, which are smaller than Seanergy Maritime Holdings quarterly revenues of $44.4M. Icon Energy's net income of -$425K is lower than Seanergy Maritime Holdings's net income of $12.5M. Notably, Icon Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.27x while Seanergy Maritime Holdings's PE ratio is 3.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Icon Energy is 0.69x versus 0.85x for Seanergy Maritime Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.