Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret
It’s not often that a company with the scale and…
Sell
42
IAS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$10.44
Seasonality move
:
-7.27%
Day range:
$10.26 - $10.52
52-week range:
$7.98 - $17.53
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
52.23x
P/S ratio:
3.38x
P/B ratio:
1.73x
Volume:
1.1M
Avg. volume:
1.1M
1-year change:
-30.93%
Market cap:
$1.7B
Revenue:
$474.4M
EPS (TTM):
$0.20
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IAS
Integral Ad Science Holding
|
$138.1M | $0.19 | 10.93% | 293.33% | $16.72 |
|
CMGO
CMG Holdings Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LDWY
Lendway
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MCHX
Marchex
|
$12.6M | -$0.01 | -3.09% | -- | -- |
|
NCMI
National CineMedia
|
$58.2M | -$0.05 | -7.79% | 29.17% | -- |
|
WRMA
Wiremedia
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IAS
Integral Ad Science Holding
|
$10.45 | $16.72 | $1.7B | 52.23x | $0.00 | 0% | 3.38x |
|
CMGO
CMG Holdings Group
|
$0.0018 | -- | $767.7K | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.30x |
|
LDWY
Lendway
|
$4.92 | -- | $8.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
MCHX
Marchex
|
$1.98 | -- | $86.5M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.94x |
|
NCMI
National CineMedia
|
$6.72 | -- | $637.8M | 2.55x | $0.00 | 0% | 2.64x |
|
WRMA
Wiremedia
|
$0.0021 | -- | $475K | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IAS
Integral Ad Science Holding
|
6.12% | -1.374 | 3.66% | 3.08x |
|
CMGO
CMG Holdings Group
|
63.73% | -1.124 | 99.67% | 1.31x |
|
LDWY
Lendway
|
75.23% | 0.567 | 443.49% | 0.40x |
|
MCHX
Marchex
|
-- | 0.155 | -- | 2.29x |
|
NCMI
National CineMedia
|
2.53% | 1.303 | 1.49% | 2.33x |
|
WRMA
Wiremedia
|
-- | -5.667 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IAS
Integral Ad Science Holding
|
$106.2M | $17.6M | 3.11% | 3.52% | 15.12% | $15.1M |
|
CMGO
CMG Holdings Group
|
$11.3K | -$147.8K | -3.23% | -8.01% | -733.23% | -$102.8K |
|
LDWY
Lendway
|
$1.4M | -$1.4M | -8.6% | -20.1% | -20.38% | -$7.8M |
|
MCHX
Marchex
|
$8.3M | -$825K | -11.83% | -11.83% | -6.57% | $199K |
|
NCMI
National CineMedia
|
$26.2M | -$7.5M | -5.63% | -5.77% | -5.13% | -$2.6M |
|
WRMA
Wiremedia
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Integral Ad Science Holding vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns IAS or CMGO?
CMG Holdings Group has a net margin of 12.05% compared to Integral Ad Science Holding's net margin of -817.39%. Integral Ad Science Holding's return on equity of 3.52% beat CMG Holdings Group's return on equity of -8.01%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IASIntegral Ad Science Holding79.5% $0.10 $1B CMGOCMG Holdings Group76.42% -$0.00 $1.2M -
What do Analysts Say About IAS or CMGO?
Integral Ad Science Holding has a consensus price target of $16.72, signalling upside risk potential of 41.12%. On the other hand CMG Holdings Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 43900%. Given that CMG Holdings Group has higher upside potential than Integral Ad Science Holding, analysts believe CMG Holdings Group is more attractive than Integral Ad Science Holding.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IASIntegral Ad Science Holding11 4 0 CMGOCMG Holdings Group0 0 0 -
Is IAS or CMGO More Risky?
Integral Ad Science Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CMG Holdings Group has a beta of 1.041, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.1%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IAS or CMGO?
Integral Ad Science Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CMG Holdings Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Integral Ad Science Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CMG Holdings Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IAS or CMGO?
Integral Ad Science Holding quarterly revenues are $133.5M, which are larger than CMG Holdings Group quarterly revenues of $14.8K. Integral Ad Science Holding's net income of $16.1M is higher than CMG Holdings Group's net income of -$121K. Notably, Integral Ad Science Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 52.23x while CMG Holdings Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Integral Ad Science Holding is 3.38x versus 0.30x for CMG Holdings Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IASIntegral Ad Science Holding3.38x 52.23x $133.5M $16.1M CMGOCMG Holdings Group0.30x -- $14.8K -$121K
-
Which has Higher Returns IAS or LDWY?
Lendway has a net margin of 12.05% compared to Integral Ad Science Holding's net margin of -16.97%. Integral Ad Science Holding's return on equity of 3.52% beat Lendway's return on equity of -20.1%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IASIntegral Ad Science Holding79.5% $0.10 $1B LDWYLendway21.73% -$0.64 $54.2M -
What do Analysts Say About IAS or LDWY?
Integral Ad Science Holding has a consensus price target of $16.72, signalling upside risk potential of 41.12%. On the other hand Lendway has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Integral Ad Science Holding has higher upside potential than Lendway, analysts believe Integral Ad Science Holding is more attractive than Lendway.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IASIntegral Ad Science Holding11 4 0 LDWYLendway0 0 0 -
Is IAS or LDWY More Risky?
Integral Ad Science Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lendway has a beta of 1.897, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 89.693%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IAS or LDWY?
Integral Ad Science Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lendway offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Integral Ad Science Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lendway pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IAS or LDWY?
Integral Ad Science Holding quarterly revenues are $133.5M, which are larger than Lendway quarterly revenues of $6.6M. Integral Ad Science Holding's net income of $16.1M is higher than Lendway's net income of -$1.1M. Notably, Integral Ad Science Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 52.23x while Lendway's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Integral Ad Science Holding is 3.38x versus -- for Lendway. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IASIntegral Ad Science Holding3.38x 52.23x $133.5M $16.1M LDWYLendway-- -- $6.6M -$1.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns IAS or MCHX?
Marchex has a net margin of 12.05% compared to Integral Ad Science Holding's net margin of -6.62%. Integral Ad Science Holding's return on equity of 3.52% beat Marchex's return on equity of -11.83%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IASIntegral Ad Science Holding79.5% $0.10 $1B MCHXMarchex66.35% -$0.02 $34.1M -
What do Analysts Say About IAS or MCHX?
Integral Ad Science Holding has a consensus price target of $16.72, signalling upside risk potential of 41.12%. On the other hand Marchex has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 64.14%. Given that Marchex has higher upside potential than Integral Ad Science Holding, analysts believe Marchex is more attractive than Integral Ad Science Holding.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IASIntegral Ad Science Holding11 4 0 MCHXMarchex0 0 0 -
Is IAS or MCHX More Risky?
Integral Ad Science Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marchex has a beta of 1.913, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 91.264%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IAS or MCHX?
Integral Ad Science Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Marchex offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Integral Ad Science Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Marchex pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IAS or MCHX?
Integral Ad Science Holding quarterly revenues are $133.5M, which are larger than Marchex quarterly revenues of $12.6M. Integral Ad Science Holding's net income of $16.1M is higher than Marchex's net income of -$831K. Notably, Integral Ad Science Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 52.23x while Marchex's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Integral Ad Science Holding is 3.38x versus 1.94x for Marchex. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IASIntegral Ad Science Holding3.38x 52.23x $133.5M $16.1M MCHXMarchex1.94x -- $12.6M -$831K
-
Which has Higher Returns IAS or NCMI?
National CineMedia has a net margin of 12.05% compared to Integral Ad Science Holding's net margin of -5.77%. Integral Ad Science Holding's return on equity of 3.52% beat National CineMedia's return on equity of -5.77%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IASIntegral Ad Science Holding79.5% $0.10 $1B NCMINational CineMedia41.99% -$0.04 $395.5M -
What do Analysts Say About IAS or NCMI?
Integral Ad Science Holding has a consensus price target of $16.72, signalling upside risk potential of 41.12%. On the other hand National CineMedia has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 19.98%. Given that Integral Ad Science Holding has higher upside potential than National CineMedia, analysts believe Integral Ad Science Holding is more attractive than National CineMedia.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IASIntegral Ad Science Holding11 4 0 NCMINational CineMedia0 0 0 -
Is IAS or NCMI More Risky?
Integral Ad Science Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison National CineMedia has a beta of 2.084, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 108.414%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IAS or NCMI?
Integral Ad Science Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. National CineMedia offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Integral Ad Science Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. National CineMedia pays out 0.07% of its earnings as a dividend. National CineMedia's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IAS or NCMI?
Integral Ad Science Holding quarterly revenues are $133.5M, which are larger than National CineMedia quarterly revenues of $62.4M. Integral Ad Science Holding's net income of $16.1M is higher than National CineMedia's net income of -$3.6M. Notably, Integral Ad Science Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 52.23x while National CineMedia's PE ratio is 2.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Integral Ad Science Holding is 3.38x versus 2.64x for National CineMedia. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IASIntegral Ad Science Holding3.38x 52.23x $133.5M $16.1M NCMINational CineMedia2.64x 2.55x $62.4M -$3.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns IAS or WRMA?
Wiremedia has a net margin of 12.05% compared to Integral Ad Science Holding's net margin of --. Integral Ad Science Holding's return on equity of 3.52% beat Wiremedia's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IASIntegral Ad Science Holding79.5% $0.10 $1B WRMAWiremedia-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About IAS or WRMA?
Integral Ad Science Holding has a consensus price target of $16.72, signalling upside risk potential of 41.12%. On the other hand Wiremedia has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Integral Ad Science Holding has higher upside potential than Wiremedia, analysts believe Integral Ad Science Holding is more attractive than Wiremedia.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IASIntegral Ad Science Holding11 4 0 WRMAWiremedia0 0 0 -
Is IAS or WRMA More Risky?
Integral Ad Science Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wiremedia has a beta of -19.773, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2077.311%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IAS or WRMA?
Integral Ad Science Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Wiremedia offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Integral Ad Science Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Wiremedia pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IAS or WRMA?
Integral Ad Science Holding quarterly revenues are $133.5M, which are larger than Wiremedia quarterly revenues of --. Integral Ad Science Holding's net income of $16.1M is higher than Wiremedia's net income of --. Notably, Integral Ad Science Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 52.23x while Wiremedia's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Integral Ad Science Holding is 3.38x versus -- for Wiremedia. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IASIntegral Ad Science Holding3.38x 52.23x $133.5M $16.1M WRMAWiremedia-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Tyson Foods Stock Bounce Back?
Tyson Foods, Inc. (NYSE:TSN) is one of the biggest food…
Will Iovance Biotherapeutics Stock Bounce Back?
Iovance Biotherapeutics (NASDAQ:IOVA) is a fledgling pharmaceutical company that specializes…
Stock Ideas
Buy
64
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 113x
Buy
55
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
61
QMCO alert for Dec 21
Quantum [QMCO] is up 26.28% over the past day.
Sell
46
NUKK alert for Dec 21
Nukkleus [NUKK] is down 22.94% over the past day.
Sell
1
IIPR alert for Dec 21
Innovative Industrial Properties [IIPR] is down 22.7% over the past day.
