HYMC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Dakota Gold Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Hycroft Mining Holding Corp.'s net margin of --. Hycroft Mining Holding Corp.'s return on equity of -- beat Dakota Gold Corp.'s return on equity of -24.04%.

Hycroft Mining Holding Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 691.72%. On the other hand Dakota Gold Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $10.80 which suggests that it could grow by 85.57%. Given that Hycroft Mining Holding Corp. has higher upside potential than Dakota Gold Corp., analysts believe Hycroft Mining Holding Corp. is more attractive than Dakota Gold Corp..

Hycroft Mining Holding Corp. has a beta of 2.712, which suggesting that the stock is 171.183% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dakota Gold Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Hycroft Mining Holding Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Dakota Gold Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hycroft Mining Holding Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dakota Gold Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Hycroft Mining Holding Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Dakota Gold Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Hycroft Mining Holding Corp.'s net income of -$9.4M is higher than Dakota Gold Corp.'s net income of -$10.5M. Notably, Hycroft Mining Holding Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Dakota Gold Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hycroft Mining Holding Corp. is 2.67x versus -- for Dakota Gold Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gold Resource Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Hycroft Mining Holding Corp.'s net margin of -18.92%. Hycroft Mining Holding Corp.'s return on equity of -- beat Gold Resource Corp.'s return on equity of -125.44%.

Hycroft Mining Holding Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 691.72%. On the other hand Gold Resource Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $1.25 which suggests that it could grow by 41.26%. Given that Hycroft Mining Holding Corp. has higher upside potential than Gold Resource Corp., analysts believe Hycroft Mining Holding Corp. is more attractive than Gold Resource Corp..

Hycroft Mining Holding Corp. has a beta of 2.712, which suggesting that the stock is 171.183% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gold Resource Corp. has a beta of 0.816, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.427%.

Hycroft Mining Holding Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gold Resource Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hycroft Mining Holding Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gold Resource Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Hycroft Mining Holding Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Gold Resource Corp. quarterly revenues of $24.6M. Hycroft Mining Holding Corp.'s net income of -$9.4M is lower than Gold Resource Corp.'s net income of -$4.7M. Notably, Hycroft Mining Holding Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Gold Resource Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hycroft Mining Holding Corp. is 2.67x versus 1.74x for Gold Resource Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Hycroft Mining Holding Corp.'s net margin of 26.71%. Hycroft Mining Holding Corp.'s return on equity of -- beat Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of 19.72%.

Hycroft Mining Holding Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 691.72%. On the other hand Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $45.00 which suggests that it could fall by -1.92%. Given that Hycroft Mining Holding Corp. has higher upside potential than Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc., analysts believe Hycroft Mining Holding Corp. is more attractive than Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc..

Hycroft Mining Holding Corp. has a beta of 2.712, which suggesting that the stock is 171.183% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. has a beta of 0.977, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.31%.

Hycroft Mining Holding Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hycroft Mining Holding Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Hycroft Mining Holding Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues of $11.1M. Hycroft Mining Holding Corp.'s net income of -$9.4M is lower than Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc.'s net income of $3M. Notably, Hycroft Mining Holding Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc.'s PE ratio is 65.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hycroft Mining Holding Corp. is 2.67x versus 18.28x for Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vista Gold Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Hycroft Mining Holding Corp.'s net margin of --. Hycroft Mining Holding Corp.'s return on equity of -- beat Vista Gold Corp.'s return on equity of -46.02%.

Hycroft Mining Holding Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 691.72%. On the other hand Vista Gold Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $3.00 which suggests that it could grow by 42.86%. Given that Hycroft Mining Holding Corp. has higher upside potential than Vista Gold Corp., analysts believe Hycroft Mining Holding Corp. is more attractive than Vista Gold Corp..

Hycroft Mining Holding Corp. has a beta of 2.712, which suggesting that the stock is 171.183% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vista Gold Corp. has a beta of 1.145, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.482%.

Hycroft Mining Holding Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Vista Gold Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hycroft Mining Holding Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vista Gold Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Hycroft Mining Holding Corp. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Vista Gold Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Hycroft Mining Holding Corp.'s net income of -$9.4M is lower than Vista Gold Corp.'s net income of -$723K. Notably, Hycroft Mining Holding Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Vista Gold Corp.'s PE ratio is 14.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hycroft Mining Holding Corp. is 2.67x versus 278.00x for Vista Gold Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.