Financhill
Sell
36

GSIB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$52.16
Seasonality move :
14.63%
Day range:
$51.75 - $52.20
52-week range:
$31.77 - $53.09
Dividend yield:
1.72%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
4.4K
Avg. volume:
10.7K
1-year change:
58.28%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
GSIB
Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF
-- -- -- -- --
IXG
iShares Global Financials ETF
-- -- -- -- --
IYG
iShares US Financial Services ETF
-- -- -- -- --
KBWB
Invesco KBW Bank ETF
-- -- -- -- --
XLF
State Street Financial Sel Sec SPDR ETF
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
GSIB
Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF
$51.55 -- -- -- $1.00 1.72% --
IXG
iShares Global Financials ETF
$119.61 -- -- -- $1.07 2.06% --
IYG
iShares US Financial Services ETF
$91.54 -- -- -- $0.26 1.01% --
KBWB
Invesco KBW Bank ETF
$84.31 -- -- -- $0.45 1.94% --
XLF
State Street Financial Sel Sec SPDR ETF
$54.54 -- -- -- $0.18 1.35% --
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
GSIB
Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF
-- 0.736 -- --
IXG
iShares Global Financials ETF
-- 0.779 -- --
IYG
iShares US Financial Services ETF
-- 1.175 -- --
KBWB
Invesco KBW Bank ETF
-- 1.906 -- --
XLF
State Street Financial Sel Sec SPDR ETF
-- 0.932 -- --
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
GSIB
Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF
-- -- -- -- -- --
IXG
iShares Global Financials ETF
-- -- -- -- -- --
IYG
iShares US Financial Services ETF
-- -- -- -- -- --
KBWB
Invesco KBW Bank ETF
-- -- -- -- -- --
XLF
State Street Financial Sel Sec SPDR ETF
-- -- -- -- -- --

Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns GSIB or IXG?

    iShares Global Financials ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF's net margin of --. Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Global Financials ETF's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GSIB
    Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF
    -- -- --
    IXG
    iShares Global Financials ETF
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About GSIB or IXG?

    Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Global Financials ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Global Financials ETF, analysts believe Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF is more attractive than iShares Global Financials ETF.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GSIB
    Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF
    0 0 0
    IXG
    iShares Global Financials ETF
    0 0 0
  • Is GSIB or IXG More Risky?

    Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Global Financials ETF has a beta of 0.961, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.902%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GSIB or IXG?

    Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.72%. iShares Global Financials ETF offers a yield of 2.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.07 per share. Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Global Financials ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GSIB or IXG?

    Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Global Financials ETF quarterly revenues of --. Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Global Financials ETF's net income of --. Notably, Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Global Financials ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Global Financials ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GSIB
    Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF
    -- -- -- --
    IXG
    iShares Global Financials ETF
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns GSIB or IYG?

    iShares US Financial Services ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF's net margin of --. Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares US Financial Services ETF's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GSIB
    Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF
    -- -- --
    IYG
    iShares US Financial Services ETF
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About GSIB or IYG?

    Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares US Financial Services ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF has higher upside potential than iShares US Financial Services ETF, analysts believe Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF is more attractive than iShares US Financial Services ETF.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GSIB
    Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF
    0 0 0
    IYG
    iShares US Financial Services ETF
    0 0 0
  • Is GSIB or IYG More Risky?

    Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares US Financial Services ETF has a beta of 1.143, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.331%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GSIB or IYG?

    Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.72%. iShares US Financial Services ETF offers a yield of 1.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares US Financial Services ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GSIB or IYG?

    Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares US Financial Services ETF quarterly revenues of --. Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares US Financial Services ETF's net income of --. Notably, Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares US Financial Services ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF is -- versus -- for iShares US Financial Services ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GSIB
    Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF
    -- -- -- --
    IYG
    iShares US Financial Services ETF
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns GSIB or KBWB?

    Invesco KBW Bank ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF's net margin of --. Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco KBW Bank ETF's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GSIB
    Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF
    -- -- --
    KBWB
    Invesco KBW Bank ETF
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About GSIB or KBWB?

    Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco KBW Bank ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco KBW Bank ETF, analysts believe Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF is more attractive than Invesco KBW Bank ETF.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GSIB
    Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF
    0 0 0
    KBWB
    Invesco KBW Bank ETF
    0 0 0
  • Is GSIB or KBWB More Risky?

    Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco KBW Bank ETF has a beta of 1.202, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.204%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GSIB or KBWB?

    Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.72%. Invesco KBW Bank ETF offers a yield of 1.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco KBW Bank ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GSIB or KBWB?

    Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco KBW Bank ETF quarterly revenues of --. Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco KBW Bank ETF's net income of --. Notably, Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco KBW Bank ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco KBW Bank ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GSIB
    Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF
    -- -- -- --
    KBWB
    Invesco KBW Bank ETF
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns GSIB or XLF?

    State Street Financial Sel Sec SPDR ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF's net margin of --. Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF's return on equity of -- beat State Street Financial Sel Sec SPDR ETF's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GSIB
    Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF
    -- -- --
    XLF
    State Street Financial Sel Sec SPDR ETF
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About GSIB or XLF?

    Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand State Street Financial Sel Sec SPDR ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF has higher upside potential than State Street Financial Sel Sec SPDR ETF, analysts believe Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF is more attractive than State Street Financial Sel Sec SPDR ETF.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GSIB
    Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF
    0 0 0
    XLF
    State Street Financial Sel Sec SPDR ETF
    0 0 0
  • Is GSIB or XLF More Risky?

    Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison State Street Financial Sel Sec SPDR ETF has a beta of 1.023, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.313%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GSIB or XLF?

    Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.72%. State Street Financial Sel Sec SPDR ETF offers a yield of 1.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. State Street Financial Sel Sec SPDR ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GSIB or XLF?

    Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than State Street Financial Sel Sec SPDR ETF quarterly revenues of --. Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF's net income of -- is lower than State Street Financial Sel Sec SPDR ETF's net income of --. Notably, Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while State Street Financial Sel Sec SPDR ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF is -- versus -- for State Street Financial Sel Sec SPDR ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GSIB
    Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF
    -- -- -- --
    XLF
    State Street Financial Sel Sec SPDR ETF
    -- -- -- --

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is Bloom Energy The Best Stock to Buy Now?
Is Bloom Energy The Best Stock to Buy Now?

Shares of energy startup Bloom Energy (NYSE:BE) have advanced by…

Is Berkshire Hathaway Stock Undervalued?
Is Berkshire Hathaway Stock Undervalued?

Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE:BRK.A,BRK.B) has undershot the market this year, returning…

Is Oracle Stock Undervalued?
Is Oracle Stock Undervalued?

Shares of Oracle (NYSE:ORCL) rocketed higher earlier this year when…

Stock Ideas

Sell
49
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.2T
P/E Ratio: 59x

Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Buy
55
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 38x

Alerts

Sell
35
SMX alert for Dec 19

SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is up 11.91% over the past day.

Sell
36
INSP alert for Dec 20

Inspire Medical Systems, Inc. [INSP] is up 1.39% over the past day.

Sell
40
INSM alert for Dec 20

Insmed, Inc. [INSM] is up 4.79% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock