Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Sell
45
GPIQ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$51.38
Seasonality move
:
-2.24%
Day range:
$51.28 - $52.11
52-week range:
$38.13 - $54.63
Dividend yield:
10.09%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
790.4K
Avg. volume:
1.1M
1-year change:
2.73%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GPIQ
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FTQI
First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
JEPQ
JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QQQI
NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QYLG
Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GPIQ
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF
|
$52.00 | -- | -- | -- | $0.47 | 10.09% | -- |
|
FTQI
First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF
|
$20.43 | -- | -- | -- | $0.21 | 11.67% | -- |
|
JEPQ
JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF
|
$58.15 | -- | -- | -- | $0.47 | 10.56% | -- |
|
QQQI
NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
|
$52.48 | -- | -- | -- | $0.61 | 14.21% | -- |
|
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
|
$17.73 | -- | -- | -- | $0.18 | 11.29% | -- |
|
QYLG
Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF
|
$27.14 | -- | -- | -- | $0.16 | 18% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GPIQ
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF
|
-- | 1.159 | -- | -- |
|
FTQI
First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF
|
-- | 0.866 | -- | -- |
|
JEPQ
JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF
|
-- | 0.941 | -- | -- |
|
QQQI
NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
|
-- | 1.066 | -- | -- |
|
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
|
-- | 0.729 | -- | -- |
|
QYLG
Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF
|
-- | 1.048 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GPIQ
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FTQI
First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
JEPQ
JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QQQI
NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QYLG
Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns GPIQ or FTQI?
First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF's net margin of --. Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF's return on equity of -- beat First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GPIQGoldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF-- -- -- FTQIFirst Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GPIQ or FTQI?
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF has higher upside potential than First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF, analysts believe Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF is more attractive than First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GPIQGoldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF0 0 0 FTQIFirst Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF0 0 0 -
Is GPIQ or FTQI More Risky?
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF has a beta of 0.616, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.424%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GPIQ or FTQI?
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.09%. First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF offers a yield of 11.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GPIQ or FTQI?
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF quarterly revenues of --. Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF's net income of -- is lower than First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF's net income of --. Notably, Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF is -- versus -- for First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GPIQGoldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF-- -- -- -- FTQIFirst Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GPIQ or JEPQ?
JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF's net margin of --. Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF's return on equity of -- beat JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GPIQGoldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF-- -- -- JEPQJPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GPIQ or JEPQ?
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF has higher upside potential than JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF, analysts believe Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF is more attractive than JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GPIQGoldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF0 0 0 JEPQJPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF0 0 0 -
Is GPIQ or JEPQ More Risky?
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GPIQ or JEPQ?
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.09%. JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF offers a yield of 10.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GPIQ or JEPQ?
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF quarterly revenues of --. Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF's net income of -- is lower than JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF's net income of --. Notably, Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF is -- versus -- for JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GPIQGoldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF-- -- -- -- JEPQJPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GPIQ or QQQI?
NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF's net margin of --. Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF's return on equity of -- beat NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GPIQGoldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF-- -- -- QQQINEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GPIQ or QQQI?
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF has higher upside potential than NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF, analysts believe Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF is more attractive than NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GPIQGoldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF0 0 0 QQQINEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF0 0 0 -
Is GPIQ or QQQI More Risky?
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GPIQ or QQQI?
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.09%. NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF offers a yield of 14.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.61 per share. Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GPIQ or QQQI?
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF quarterly revenues of --. Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF's net income of -- is lower than NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF's net income of --. Notably, Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF is -- versus -- for NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GPIQGoldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF-- -- -- -- QQQINEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GPIQ or QYLD?
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF's net margin of --. Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GPIQGoldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF-- -- -- QYLDGlobal X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GPIQ or QYLD?
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF has higher upside potential than Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF, analysts believe Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF is more attractive than Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GPIQGoldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF0 0 0 QYLDGlobal X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF0 0 0 -
Is GPIQ or QYLD More Risky?
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF has a beta of 0.627, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.299%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GPIQ or QYLD?
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.09%. Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF offers a yield of 11.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GPIQ or QYLD?
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF quarterly revenues of --. Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF's net income of --. Notably, Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF is -- versus -- for Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GPIQGoldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF-- -- -- -- QYLDGlobal X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GPIQ or QYLG?
Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF's net margin of --. Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GPIQGoldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF-- -- -- QYLGGlobal X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GPIQ or QYLG?
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF has higher upside potential than Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF, analysts believe Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF is more attractive than Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GPIQGoldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF0 0 0 QYLGGlobal X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF0 0 0 -
Is GPIQ or QYLG More Risky?
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF has a beta of 0.891, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.938%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GPIQ or QYLG?
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.09%. Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF offers a yield of 18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GPIQ or QYLG?
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF quarterly revenues of --. Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF's net income of --. Notably, Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF is -- versus -- for Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GPIQGoldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF-- -- -- -- QYLGGlobal X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Buy
55
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Sell
50
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Sell
40
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 29x
Alerts
Buy
77
RNG alert for Feb 23
RingCentral, Inc. [RNG] is down 12.48% over the past day.
Sell
9
FROG alert for Feb 23
JFrog Ltd. [FROG] is down 7.95% over the past day.
Buy
72
SNSE alert for Feb 23
Sensei Biotherapeutics, Inc. [SNSE] is down 2.63% over the past day.
