Financhill
Sell
50

GPIQ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$49.56
Seasonality move :
4.73%
Day range:
$48.80 - $49.95
52-week range:
$42.01 - $50.80
Dividend yield:
9.86%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
97K
Avg. volume:
98.7K
1-year change:
13.23%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
GPIQ
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF
-- -- -- -- --
EOS
Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund II
-- -- -- -- --
FTQI
First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF
-- -- -- -- --
NUSI
NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF
-- -- -- -- --
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
-- -- -- -- --
QYLG
Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
GPIQ
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF
$49.56 -- -- -- $0.43 9.86% --
EOS
Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund II
$23.81 -- -- -- $0.15 7.05% --
FTQI
First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF
$20.95 -- -- -- $0.20 11.59% --
NUSI
NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF
$26.40 -- -- -- $0.19 7.26% --
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
$18.55 -- -- -- $0.18 11.35% --
QYLG
Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF
$33.60 -- -- -- $0.18 5.78% --
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
GPIQ
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF
-- 0.934 -- --
EOS
Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund II
-- 0.750 -- --
FTQI
First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF
-- 0.684 -- --
NUSI
NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF
-- 0.751 -- --
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
-- 0.376 -- --
QYLG
Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF
-- 0.748 -- --
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
GPIQ
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF
-- -- -- -- -- --
EOS
Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund II
-- -- -- -- -- --
FTQI
First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF
-- -- -- -- -- --
NUSI
NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF
-- -- -- -- -- --
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
-- -- -- -- -- --
QYLG
Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF
-- -- -- -- -- --

Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns GPIQ or EOS?

    Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund II has a net margin of -- compared to Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF's net margin of --. Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF's return on equity of -- beat Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund II's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GPIQ
    Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF
    -- -- --
    EOS
    Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund II
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About GPIQ or EOS?

    Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund II has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF has higher upside potential than Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund II, analysts believe Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF is more attractive than Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund II.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GPIQ
    Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF
    0 0 0
    EOS
    Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund II
    0 0 0
  • Is GPIQ or EOS More Risky?

    Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund II has a beta of 1.217, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.67%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GPIQ or EOS?

    Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.86%. Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund II offers a yield of 7.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund II pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GPIQ or EOS?

    Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund II quarterly revenues of --. Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF's net income of -- is lower than Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund II's net income of --. Notably, Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund II's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF is -- versus -- for Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund II. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GPIQ
    Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF
    -- -- -- --
    EOS
    Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund II
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns GPIQ or FTQI?

    First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF's net margin of --. Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF's return on equity of -- beat First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GPIQ
    Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF
    -- -- --
    FTQI
    First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About GPIQ or FTQI?

    Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF has higher upside potential than First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF, analysts believe Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF is more attractive than First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GPIQ
    Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF
    0 0 0
    FTQI
    First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF
    0 0 0
  • Is GPIQ or FTQI More Risky?

    Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF has a beta of 0.524, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.639%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GPIQ or FTQI?

    Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.86%. First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF offers a yield of 11.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GPIQ or FTQI?

    Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF quarterly revenues of --. Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF's net income of -- is lower than First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF's net income of --. Notably, Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF is -- versus -- for First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GPIQ
    Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF
    -- -- -- --
    FTQI
    First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns GPIQ or NUSI?

    NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF's net margin of --. Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF's return on equity of -- beat NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GPIQ
    Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF
    -- -- --
    NUSI
    NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About GPIQ or NUSI?

    Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF has higher upside potential than NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF, analysts believe Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF is more attractive than NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GPIQ
    Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF
    0 0 0
    NUSI
    NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF
    0 0 0
  • Is GPIQ or NUSI More Risky?

    Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GPIQ or NUSI?

    Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.86%. NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF offers a yield of 7.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GPIQ or NUSI?

    Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF quarterly revenues of --. Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF's net income of -- is lower than NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF's net income of --. Notably, Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF is -- versus -- for NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GPIQ
    Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF
    -- -- -- --
    NUSI
    NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns GPIQ or QYLD?

    Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF's net margin of --. Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GPIQ
    Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF
    -- -- --
    QYLD
    Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About GPIQ or QYLD?

    Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF has higher upside potential than Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF, analysts believe Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF is more attractive than Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GPIQ
    Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF
    0 0 0
    QYLD
    Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
    0 0 0
  • Is GPIQ or QYLD More Risky?

    Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF has a beta of 0.652, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.788%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GPIQ or QYLD?

    Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.86%. Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF offers a yield of 11.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GPIQ or QYLD?

    Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF quarterly revenues of --. Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF's net income of --. Notably, Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF is -- versus -- for Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GPIQ
    Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF
    -- -- -- --
    QYLD
    Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns GPIQ or QYLG?

    Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF's net margin of --. Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GPIQ
    Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF
    -- -- --
    QYLG
    Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About GPIQ or QYLG?

    Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF has higher upside potential than Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF, analysts believe Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF is more attractive than Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GPIQ
    Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF
    0 0 0
    QYLG
    Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF
    0 0 0
  • Is GPIQ or QYLG More Risky?

    Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GPIQ or QYLG?

    Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.86%. Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF offers a yield of 5.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GPIQ or QYLG?

    Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF quarterly revenues of --. Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF's net income of --. Notably, Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF is -- versus -- for Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GPIQ
    Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF
    -- -- -- --
    QYLG
    Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF
    -- -- -- --

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret
Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret

It’s not often that a company with the scale and…

Will Tyson Foods Stock Bounce Back?
Will Tyson Foods Stock Bounce Back?

Tyson Foods, Inc. (NYSE:TSN) is one of the biggest food…

Will Iovance Biotherapeutics Stock Bounce Back?
Will Iovance Biotherapeutics Stock Bounce Back?

Iovance Biotherapeutics (NASDAQ:IOVA) is a fledgling pharmaceutical company that specializes…

Stock Ideas

Buy
64
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 42x

Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 113x

Buy
55
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Alerts

Buy
61
QMCO alert for Dec 21

Quantum [QMCO] is up 26.28% over the past day.

Sell
46
NUKK alert for Dec 21

Nukkleus [NUKK] is down 22.94% over the past day.

Sell
1
IIPR alert for Dec 21

Innovative Industrial Properties [IIPR] is down 22.7% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock