Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Buy
58
GFS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$47.58
Seasonality move
:
-4.56%
Day range:
$45.72 - $48.96
52-week range:
$29.77 - $50.98
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
29.60x
P/S ratio:
3.86x
P/B ratio:
2.23x
Volume:
4.3M
Avg. volume:
4.1M
1-year change:
15.54%
Market cap:
$26.1B
Revenue:
$6.8B
EPS (TTM):
$1.59
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GFS
GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.
|
$1.8B | $0.47 | 2.85% | -6.88% | $51.30 |
|
AMD
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
|
$9.7B | $1.32 | 32.45% | 190.76% | $289.81 |
|
INTC
Intel Corp.
|
$13.4B | $0.08 | -2.79% | -99.89% | $47.12 |
|
KLAC
KLA Corp.
|
$3.3B | $8.80 | 9.96% | 11.94% | $1,666.70 |
|
MRVL
Marvell Technology, Inc.
|
$2.2B | $0.79 | 20.15% | 268.98% | $115.65 |
|
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
|
$12.9B | $3.96 | 134.64% | 503.3% | $390.90 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GFS
GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.
|
$46.92 | $51.30 | $26.1B | 29.60x | $0.00 | 0% | 3.86x |
|
AMD
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
|
$203.68 | $289.81 | $332.1B | 77.01x | $0.00 | 0% | 9.62x |
|
INTC
Intel Corp.
|
$45.46 | $47.12 | $227.1B | 5,117.92x | $0.13 | 0% | 3.89x |
|
KLAC
KLA Corp.
|
$1,524.31 | $1,666.70 | $199.8B | 44.28x | $1.90 | 0.5% | 15.87x |
|
MRVL
Marvell Technology, Inc.
|
$79.29 | $115.65 | $67.2B | 27.76x | $0.06 | 0.3% | 8.88x |
|
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
|
$415.56 | $390.90 | $467.7B | 39.50x | $0.12 | 0.11% | 11.09x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GFS
GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.
|
12.07% | 0.994 | 8.42% | 1.95x |
|
AMD
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
|
5.76% | 2.726 | 1.1% | 1.79x |
|
INTC
Intel Corp.
|
29.13% | 1.498 | 23.92% | 1.31x |
|
KLAC
KLA Corp.
|
52.78% | 1.903 | 3.83% | 1.86x |
|
MRVL
Marvell Technology, Inc.
|
26.36% | 4.600 | 6.23% | 1.56x |
|
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
|
17.52% | 3.611 | 4.69% | 1.52x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GFS
GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.
|
$508M | $255M | 6.72% | 7.77% | 13.93% | $166M |
|
AMD
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
|
$5.3B | $1.8B | 6.72% | 7.14% | 17.07% | $2.4B |
|
INTC
Intel Corp.
|
$5.2B | $820M | 0.02% | 0.02% | 6% | $800M |
|
KLAC
KLA Corp.
|
$2B | $1.4B | 42.85% | 100.25% | 41.01% | $1.3B |
|
MRVL
Marvell Technology, Inc.
|
$1.1B | $367.4M | 13.51% | 18.3% | 17.71% | $507.6M |
|
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
|
$7.6B | $6.1B | 17.9% | 22.98% | 44.95% | $3B |
GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns GFS or AMD?
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. has a net margin of 10.93% compared to GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.'s net margin of 15.77%. GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.77% beat Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.14%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GFSGLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.27.76% $0.36 $13.6B AMDAdvanced Micro Devices, Inc.51.42% $0.92 $66.8B -
What do Analysts Say About GFS or AMD?
GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc. has a consensus price target of $51.30, signalling upside risk potential of 9.33%. On the other hand Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $289.81 which suggests that it could grow by 42.29%. Given that Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. has higher upside potential than GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc., analysts believe Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. is more attractive than GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GFSGLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.6 10 0 AMDAdvanced Micro Devices, Inc.34 12 0 -
Is GFS or AMD More Risky?
GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. has a beta of 1.941, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 94.149%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GFS or AMD?
GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GFS or AMD?
GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. quarterly revenues of $10.3B. GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.'s net income of $200M is lower than Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.'s net income of $1.6B. Notably, GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 29.60x while Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.'s PE ratio is 77.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc. is 3.86x versus 9.62x for Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GFSGLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.3.86x 29.60x $1.8B $200M AMDAdvanced Micro Devices, Inc.9.62x 77.01x $10.3B $1.6B
-
Which has Higher Returns GFS or INTC?
Intel Corp. has a net margin of 10.93% compared to GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.'s net margin of -2.44%. GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.77% beat Intel Corp.'s return on equity of 0.02%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GFSGLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.27.76% $0.36 $13.6B INTCIntel Corp.38% -$0.12 $173.3B -
What do Analysts Say About GFS or INTC?
GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc. has a consensus price target of $51.30, signalling upside risk potential of 9.33%. On the other hand Intel Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $47.12 which suggests that it could grow by 3.65%. Given that GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc. has higher upside potential than Intel Corp., analysts believe GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc. is more attractive than Intel Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GFSGLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.6 10 0 INTCIntel Corp.8 33 2 -
Is GFS or INTC More Risky?
GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intel Corp. has a beta of 1.386, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.623%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GFS or INTC?
GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intel Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intel Corp. pays out 8.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Intel Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GFS or INTC?
GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than Intel Corp. quarterly revenues of $13.7B. GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.'s net income of $200M is higher than Intel Corp.'s net income of -$333M. Notably, GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 29.60x while Intel Corp.'s PE ratio is 5,117.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc. is 3.86x versus 3.89x for Intel Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GFSGLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.3.86x 29.60x $1.8B $200M INTCIntel Corp.3.89x 5,117.92x $13.7B -$333M
-
Which has Higher Returns GFS or KLAC?
KLA Corp. has a net margin of 10.93% compared to GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.'s net margin of 34.77%. GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.77% beat KLA Corp.'s return on equity of 100.25%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GFSGLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.27.76% $0.36 $13.6B KLACKLA Corp.59.62% $8.73 $11.6B -
What do Analysts Say About GFS or KLAC?
GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc. has a consensus price target of $51.30, signalling upside risk potential of 9.33%. On the other hand KLA Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $1,666.70 which suggests that it could grow by 9.34%. Given that KLA Corp. has higher upside potential than GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc., analysts believe KLA Corp. is more attractive than GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GFSGLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.6 10 0 KLACKLA Corp.14 12 0 -
Is GFS or KLAC More Risky?
GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KLA Corp. has a beta of 1.467, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.659%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GFS or KLAC?
GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. KLA Corp. offers a yield of 0.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.90 per share. GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KLA Corp. pays out 22.23% of its earnings as a dividend. KLA Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GFS or KLAC?
GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than KLA Corp. quarterly revenues of $3.3B. GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.'s net income of $200M is lower than KLA Corp.'s net income of $1.1B. Notably, GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 29.60x while KLA Corp.'s PE ratio is 44.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc. is 3.86x versus 15.87x for KLA Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GFSGLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.3.86x 29.60x $1.8B $200M KLACKLA Corp.15.87x 44.28x $3.3B $1.1B
-
Which has Higher Returns GFS or MRVL?
Marvell Technology, Inc. has a net margin of 10.93% compared to GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.'s net margin of 91.65%. GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.77% beat Marvell Technology, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.3%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GFSGLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.27.76% $0.36 $13.6B MRVLMarvell Technology, Inc.51.57% $2.20 $19.1B -
What do Analysts Say About GFS or MRVL?
GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc. has a consensus price target of $51.30, signalling upside risk potential of 9.33%. On the other hand Marvell Technology, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $115.65 which suggests that it could grow by 45.86%. Given that Marvell Technology, Inc. has higher upside potential than GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc., analysts believe Marvell Technology, Inc. is more attractive than GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GFSGLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.6 10 0 MRVLMarvell Technology, Inc.26 11 0 -
Is GFS or MRVL More Risky?
GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marvell Technology, Inc. has a beta of 1.967, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 96.661%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GFS or MRVL?
GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Marvell Technology, Inc. offers a yield of 0.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Marvell Technology, Inc. pays out 23.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Marvell Technology, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GFS or MRVL?
GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than Marvell Technology, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.1B. GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.'s net income of $200M is lower than Marvell Technology, Inc.'s net income of $1.9B. Notably, GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 29.60x while Marvell Technology, Inc.'s PE ratio is 27.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc. is 3.86x versus 8.88x for Marvell Technology, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GFSGLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.3.86x 29.60x $1.8B $200M MRVLMarvell Technology, Inc.8.88x 27.76x $2.1B $1.9B
-
Which has Higher Returns GFS or MU?
Micron Technology, Inc. has a net margin of 10.93% compared to GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.'s net margin of 38.41%. GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.77% beat Micron Technology, Inc.'s return on equity of 22.98%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GFSGLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.27.76% $0.36 $13.6B MUMicron Technology, Inc.56% $4.60 $71.3B -
What do Analysts Say About GFS or MU?
GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc. has a consensus price target of $51.30, signalling upside risk potential of 9.33%. On the other hand Micron Technology, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $390.90 which suggests that it could fall by -5.94%. Given that GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc. has higher upside potential than Micron Technology, Inc., analysts believe GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc. is more attractive than Micron Technology, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GFSGLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.6 10 0 MUMicron Technology, Inc.28 3 2 -
Is GFS or MU More Risky?
GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Micron Technology, Inc. has a beta of 1.517, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.672%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GFS or MU?
GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Micron Technology, Inc. offers a yield of 0.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Micron Technology, Inc. pays out 6.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Micron Technology, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GFS or MU?
GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than Micron Technology, Inc. quarterly revenues of $13.6B. GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.'s net income of $200M is lower than Micron Technology, Inc.'s net income of $5.2B. Notably, GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 29.60x while Micron Technology, Inc.'s PE ratio is 39.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc. is 3.86x versus 11.09x for Micron Technology, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GFSGLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.3.86x 29.60x $1.8B $200M MUMicron Technology, Inc.11.09x 39.50x $13.6B $5.2B
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Sell
50
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Sell
37
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 28x
Alerts
Buy
59
SEZL alert for Feb 27
Sezzle, Inc. [SEZL] is down 13.92% over the past day.
Buy
83
GCT alert for Feb 27
GigaCloud Technology, Inc. [GCT] is down 5.87% over the past day.
Buy
62
LMAT alert for Feb 27
LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. [LMAT] is down 4.76% over the past day.
