GAME Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

GD Culture Group has a net margin of -20.76% compared to GameSquare Holdings's net margin of --. GameSquare Holdings's return on equity of -115.34% beat GD Culture Group's return on equity of --.

GameSquare Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 326.8%. On the other hand GD Culture Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that GameSquare Holdings has higher upside potential than GD Culture Group, analysts believe GameSquare Holdings is more attractive than GD Culture Group.

GameSquare Holdings has a beta of 1.160, which suggesting that the stock is 16.022% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GD Culture Group has a beta of 1.570, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.006%.

GameSquare Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GD Culture Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. GameSquare Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. GD Culture Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

GameSquare Holdings quarterly revenues are $26.4M, which are larger than GD Culture Group quarterly revenues of --. GameSquare Holdings's net income of -$5.5M is lower than GD Culture Group's net income of -$3.7M. Notably, GameSquare Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while GD Culture Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GameSquare Holdings is 0.18x versus -- for GD Culture Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Golden Matrix Group has a net margin of -20.76% compared to GameSquare Holdings's net margin of -8.31%. GameSquare Holdings's return on equity of -115.34% beat Golden Matrix Group's return on equity of -4.41%.

GameSquare Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 326.8%. On the other hand Golden Matrix Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 105.13%. Given that GameSquare Holdings has higher upside potential than Golden Matrix Group, analysts believe GameSquare Holdings is more attractive than Golden Matrix Group.

GameSquare Holdings has a beta of 1.160, which suggesting that the stock is 16.022% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Golden Matrix Group has a beta of 1.901, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 90.092%.

GameSquare Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Golden Matrix Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. GameSquare Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Golden Matrix Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

GameSquare Holdings quarterly revenues are $26.4M, which are smaller than Golden Matrix Group quarterly revenues of $41M. GameSquare Holdings's net income of -$5.5M is lower than Golden Matrix Group's net income of -$3.4M. Notably, GameSquare Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Golden Matrix Group's PE ratio is 803.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GameSquare Holdings is 0.18x versus 1.52x for Golden Matrix Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Motorsport Games has a net margin of -20.76% compared to GameSquare Holdings's net margin of 0.55%. GameSquare Holdings's return on equity of -115.34% beat Motorsport Games's return on equity of 272.93%.

GameSquare Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 326.8%. On the other hand Motorsport Games has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 358.67%. Given that Motorsport Games has higher upside potential than GameSquare Holdings, analysts believe Motorsport Games is more attractive than GameSquare Holdings.

GameSquare Holdings has a beta of 1.160, which suggesting that the stock is 16.022% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Motorsport Games has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

GameSquare Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Motorsport Games offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. GameSquare Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Motorsport Games pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

GameSquare Holdings quarterly revenues are $26.4M, which are larger than Motorsport Games quarterly revenues of $1.8M. GameSquare Holdings's net income of -$5.5M is lower than Motorsport Games's net income of $9.8K. Notably, GameSquare Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Motorsport Games's PE ratio is 0.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GameSquare Holdings is 0.18x versus 0.36x for Motorsport Games. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Take-Two Interactive Software has a net margin of -20.76% compared to GameSquare Holdings's net margin of -27.01%. GameSquare Holdings's return on equity of -115.34% beat Take-Two Interactive Software's return on equity of -52.65%.

GameSquare Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 326.8%. On the other hand Take-Two Interactive Software has an analysts' consensus of $196.07 which suggests that it could grow by 7.75%. Given that GameSquare Holdings has higher upside potential than Take-Two Interactive Software, analysts believe GameSquare Holdings is more attractive than Take-Two Interactive Software.

GameSquare Holdings has a beta of 1.160, which suggesting that the stock is 16.022% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Take-Two Interactive Software has a beta of 0.886, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.445%.

GameSquare Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Take-Two Interactive Software offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. GameSquare Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Take-Two Interactive Software pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

GameSquare Holdings quarterly revenues are $26.4M, which are smaller than Take-Two Interactive Software quarterly revenues of $1.4B. GameSquare Holdings's net income of -$5.5M is higher than Take-Two Interactive Software's net income of -$365.5M. Notably, GameSquare Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Take-Two Interactive Software's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GameSquare Holdings is 0.18x versus 5.74x for Take-Two Interactive Software. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.