FTHM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

First Hartford Corp. has a net margin of -3.78% compared to Fathom Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of --. Fathom Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -45.14% beat First Hartford Corp.'s return on equity of --.

Fathom Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $2.50, signalling upside risk potential of 106.61%. On the other hand First Hartford Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fathom Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than First Hartford Corp., analysts believe Fathom Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than First Hartford Corp..

Fathom Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.885, which suggesting that the stock is 88.523% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Hartford Corp. has a beta of 0.180, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 82.036%.

Fathom Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. First Hartford Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fathom Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Hartford Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fathom Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $115.3M, which are larger than First Hartford Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Fathom Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$4.4M is higher than First Hartford Corp.'s net income of --. Notably, Fathom Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while First Hartford Corp.'s PE ratio is 4.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fathom Holdings, Inc. is 0.07x versus 0.49x for First Hartford Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Forestar Group, Inc. has a net margin of -3.78% compared to Fathom Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 12.98%. Fathom Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -45.14% beat Forestar Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.3%.

Fathom Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $2.50, signalling upside risk potential of 106.61%. On the other hand Forestar Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $32.50 which suggests that it could grow by 23.62%. Given that Fathom Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Forestar Group, Inc., analysts believe Fathom Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Forestar Group, Inc..

Fathom Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.885, which suggesting that the stock is 88.523% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Forestar Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.412, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.183%.

Fathom Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Forestar Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fathom Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Forestar Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fathom Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $115.3M, which are smaller than Forestar Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $670.5M. Fathom Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$4.4M is lower than Forestar Group, Inc.'s net income of $87M. Notably, Fathom Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Forestar Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 7.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fathom Holdings, Inc. is 0.07x versus 0.81x for Forestar Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Granite Point Mortgage Trust, Inc. has a net margin of -3.78% compared to Fathom Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 7.62%. Fathom Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -45.14% beat Granite Point Mortgage Trust, Inc.'s return on equity of -9.31%.

Fathom Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $2.50, signalling upside risk potential of 106.61%. On the other hand Granite Point Mortgage Trust, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $3.13 which suggests that it could grow by 13.64%. Given that Fathom Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Granite Point Mortgage Trust, Inc., analysts believe Fathom Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Granite Point Mortgage Trust, Inc..

Fathom Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.885, which suggesting that the stock is 88.523% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Granite Point Mortgage Trust, Inc. has a beta of 1.730, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.024%.

Fathom Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Granite Point Mortgage Trust, Inc. offers a yield of 7.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Fathom Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Granite Point Mortgage Trust, Inc. pays out 18.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Granite Point Mortgage Trust, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fathom Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $115.3M, which are larger than Granite Point Mortgage Trust, Inc. quarterly revenues of $37.3M. Fathom Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$4.4M is lower than Granite Point Mortgage Trust, Inc.'s net income of $2.8M. Notably, Fathom Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Granite Point Mortgage Trust, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fathom Holdings, Inc. is 0.07x versus 0.86x for Granite Point Mortgage Trust, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Anywhere Real Estate, Inc. has a net margin of -3.78% compared to Fathom Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -0.8%. Fathom Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -45.14% beat Anywhere Real Estate, Inc.'s return on equity of -7.95%.

Fathom Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $2.50, signalling upside risk potential of 106.61%. On the other hand Anywhere Real Estate, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $11.67 which suggests that it could fall by -17.78%. Given that Fathom Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Anywhere Real Estate, Inc., analysts believe Fathom Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Anywhere Real Estate, Inc..

Fathom Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.885, which suggesting that the stock is 88.523% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Anywhere Real Estate, Inc. has a beta of 1.867, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.699%.

Fathom Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Anywhere Real Estate, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fathom Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Anywhere Real Estate, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fathom Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $115.3M, which are smaller than Anywhere Real Estate, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Fathom Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$4.4M is higher than Anywhere Real Estate, Inc.'s net income of -$13M. Notably, Fathom Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Anywhere Real Estate, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fathom Holdings, Inc. is 0.07x versus 0.27x for Anywhere Real Estate, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.