FTCI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Aeluma, Inc. has a net margin of -91.96% compared to FTC Solar, Inc.'s net margin of -107.8%. FTC Solar, Inc.'s return on equity of -459.69% beat Aeluma, Inc.'s return on equity of -24.43%.

FTC Solar, Inc. has a consensus price target of $10.63, signalling downside risk potential of -10.19%. On the other hand Aeluma, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $25.50 which suggests that it could grow by 71.37%. Given that Aeluma, Inc. has higher upside potential than FTC Solar, Inc., analysts believe Aeluma, Inc. is more attractive than FTC Solar, Inc..

FTC Solar, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Aeluma, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

FTC Solar, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Aeluma, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FTC Solar, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Aeluma, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

FTC Solar, Inc. quarterly revenues are $26M, which are larger than Aeluma, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.4M. FTC Solar, Inc.'s net income of -$23.9M is lower than Aeluma, Inc.'s net income of -$1.5M. Notably, FTC Solar, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Aeluma, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FTC Solar, Inc. is 1.98x versus 41.32x for Aeluma, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

AST Spacemobile, Inc. has a net margin of -91.96% compared to FTC Solar, Inc.'s net margin of -1111.52%. FTC Solar, Inc.'s return on equity of -459.69% beat AST Spacemobile, Inc.'s return on equity of -43.99%.

FTC Solar, Inc. has a consensus price target of $10.63, signalling downside risk potential of -10.19%. On the other hand AST Spacemobile, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $71.51 which suggests that it could fall by -16.53%. Given that AST Spacemobile, Inc. has more downside risk than FTC Solar, Inc., analysts believe FTC Solar, Inc. is more attractive than AST Spacemobile, Inc..

FTC Solar, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AST Spacemobile, Inc. has a beta of 2.764, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 176.426%.

FTC Solar, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AST Spacemobile, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FTC Solar, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AST Spacemobile, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

FTC Solar, Inc. quarterly revenues are $26M, which are larger than AST Spacemobile, Inc. quarterly revenues of $14.7M. FTC Solar, Inc.'s net income of -$23.9M is higher than AST Spacemobile, Inc.'s net income of -$163.8M. Notably, FTC Solar, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while AST Spacemobile, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FTC Solar, Inc. is 1.98x versus 988.07x for AST Spacemobile, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Super Micro Computer, Inc. has a net margin of -91.96% compared to FTC Solar, Inc.'s net margin of 3.35%. FTC Solar, Inc.'s return on equity of -459.69% beat Super Micro Computer, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.66%.

FTC Solar, Inc. has a consensus price target of $10.63, signalling downside risk potential of -10.19%. On the other hand Super Micro Computer, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $48.53 which suggests that it could grow by 58.85%. Given that Super Micro Computer, Inc. has higher upside potential than FTC Solar, Inc., analysts believe Super Micro Computer, Inc. is more attractive than FTC Solar, Inc..

FTC Solar, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Super Micro Computer, Inc. has a beta of 1.524, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.401%.

FTC Solar, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Super Micro Computer, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FTC Solar, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Super Micro Computer, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

FTC Solar, Inc. quarterly revenues are $26M, which are smaller than Super Micro Computer, Inc. quarterly revenues of $5B. FTC Solar, Inc.'s net income of -$23.9M is lower than Super Micro Computer, Inc.'s net income of $168.3M. Notably, FTC Solar, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Super Micro Computer, Inc.'s PE ratio is 24.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FTC Solar, Inc. is 1.98x versus 0.92x for Super Micro Computer, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tigo Energy, Inc. has a net margin of -91.96% compared to FTC Solar, Inc.'s net margin of -7.08%. FTC Solar, Inc.'s return on equity of -459.69% beat Tigo Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of -340.2%.

FTC Solar, Inc. has a consensus price target of $10.63, signalling downside risk potential of -10.19%. On the other hand Tigo Energy, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $4.63 which suggests that it could grow by 198.39%. Given that Tigo Energy, Inc. has higher upside potential than FTC Solar, Inc., analysts believe Tigo Energy, Inc. is more attractive than FTC Solar, Inc..

FTC Solar, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tigo Energy, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

FTC Solar, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tigo Energy, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FTC Solar, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tigo Energy, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

FTC Solar, Inc. quarterly revenues are $26M, which are smaller than Tigo Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues of $30.6M. FTC Solar, Inc.'s net income of -$23.9M is lower than Tigo Energy, Inc.'s net income of -$2.2M. Notably, FTC Solar, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tigo Energy, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FTC Solar, Inc. is 1.98x versus 1.07x for Tigo Energy, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.