FTCI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

AST Spacemobile, Inc. has a net margin of -91.96% compared to FTC Solar, Inc.'s net margin of -1111.52%. FTC Solar, Inc.'s return on equity of -459.69% beat AST Spacemobile, Inc.'s return on equity of -43.99%.

FTC Solar, Inc. has a consensus price target of $10.63, signalling upside risk potential of 8.97%. On the other hand AST Spacemobile, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $71.51 which suggests that it could fall by -1.57%. Given that FTC Solar, Inc. has higher upside potential than AST Spacemobile, Inc., analysts believe FTC Solar, Inc. is more attractive than AST Spacemobile, Inc..

FTC Solar, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AST Spacemobile, Inc. has a beta of 2.764, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 176.426%.

FTC Solar, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AST Spacemobile, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FTC Solar, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AST Spacemobile, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

FTC Solar, Inc. quarterly revenues are $26M, which are larger than AST Spacemobile, Inc. quarterly revenues of $14.7M. FTC Solar, Inc.'s net income of -$23.9M is higher than AST Spacemobile, Inc.'s net income of -$163.8M. Notably, FTC Solar, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while AST Spacemobile, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FTC Solar, Inc. is 1.63x versus 919.36x for AST Spacemobile, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cloudflare, Inc. has a net margin of -91.96% compared to FTC Solar, Inc.'s net margin of -0.23%. FTC Solar, Inc.'s return on equity of -459.69% beat Cloudflare, Inc.'s return on equity of -8.54%.

FTC Solar, Inc. has a consensus price target of $10.63, signalling upside risk potential of 8.97%. On the other hand Cloudflare, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $242.21 which suggests that it could grow by 18.53%. Given that Cloudflare, Inc. has higher upside potential than FTC Solar, Inc., analysts believe Cloudflare, Inc. is more attractive than FTC Solar, Inc..

FTC Solar, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cloudflare, Inc. has a beta of 1.945, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 94.538%.

FTC Solar, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cloudflare, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FTC Solar, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cloudflare, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

FTC Solar, Inc. quarterly revenues are $26M, which are smaller than Cloudflare, Inc. quarterly revenues of $562M. FTC Solar, Inc.'s net income of -$23.9M is lower than Cloudflare, Inc.'s net income of -$1.3M. Notably, FTC Solar, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cloudflare, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FTC Solar, Inc. is 1.63x versus 35.18x for Cloudflare, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA Corp. has a net margin of -91.96% compared to FTC Solar, Inc.'s net margin of 55.98%. FTC Solar, Inc.'s return on equity of -459.69% beat NVIDIA Corp.'s return on equity of 110.69%.

FTC Solar, Inc. has a consensus price target of $10.63, signalling upside risk potential of 8.97%. On the other hand NVIDIA Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $250.66 which suggests that it could grow by 39.57%. Given that NVIDIA Corp. has higher upside potential than FTC Solar, Inc., analysts believe NVIDIA Corp. is more attractive than FTC Solar, Inc..

FTC Solar, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA Corp. has a beta of 2.285, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 128.544%.

FTC Solar, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NVIDIA Corp. offers a yield of 0.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. FTC Solar, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA Corp. pays out 1.16% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FTC Solar, Inc. quarterly revenues are $26M, which are smaller than NVIDIA Corp. quarterly revenues of $57B. FTC Solar, Inc.'s net income of -$23.9M is lower than NVIDIA Corp.'s net income of $31.9B. Notably, FTC Solar, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NVIDIA Corp.'s PE ratio is 44.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FTC Solar, Inc. is 1.63x versus 23.59x for NVIDIA Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Super Micro Computer, Inc. has a net margin of -91.96% compared to FTC Solar, Inc.'s net margin of 3.35%. FTC Solar, Inc.'s return on equity of -459.69% beat Super Micro Computer, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.66%.

FTC Solar, Inc. has a consensus price target of $10.63, signalling upside risk potential of 8.97%. On the other hand Super Micro Computer, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $48.53 which suggests that it could grow by 44.09%. Given that Super Micro Computer, Inc. has higher upside potential than FTC Solar, Inc., analysts believe Super Micro Computer, Inc. is more attractive than FTC Solar, Inc..

FTC Solar, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Super Micro Computer, Inc. has a beta of 1.524, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.401%.

FTC Solar, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Super Micro Computer, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FTC Solar, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Super Micro Computer, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

FTC Solar, Inc. quarterly revenues are $26M, which are smaller than Super Micro Computer, Inc. quarterly revenues of $5B. FTC Solar, Inc.'s net income of -$23.9M is lower than Super Micro Computer, Inc.'s net income of $168.3M. Notably, FTC Solar, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Super Micro Computer, Inc.'s PE ratio is 27.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FTC Solar, Inc. is 1.63x versus 1.02x for Super Micro Computer, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.