FLNC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

GE Vernova has a net margin of 3.9% compared to Fluence Energy's net margin of -1.79%. Fluence Energy's return on equity of 4.1% beat GE Vernova's return on equity of --.

Fluence Energy has a consensus price target of $26.77, signalling upside risk potential of 51.58%. On the other hand GE Vernova has an analysts' consensus of $366.50 which suggests that it could fall by -0.55%. Given that Fluence Energy has higher upside potential than GE Vernova, analysts believe Fluence Energy is more attractive than GE Vernova.

Fluence Energy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GE Vernova has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Fluence Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GE Vernova offers a yield of 0.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Fluence Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. GE Vernova pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fluence Energy quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are smaller than GE Vernova quarterly revenues of $7.3B. Fluence Energy's net income of $47.8M is higher than GE Vernova's net income of -$130M. Notably, Fluence Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 131.53x while GE Vernova's PE ratio is 88.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fluence Energy is 0.92x versus 2.95x for GE Vernova. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Energy Vault Holdings has a net margin of 3.9% compared to Fluence Energy's net margin of -2217.93%. Fluence Energy's return on equity of 4.1% beat Energy Vault Holdings's return on equity of -45.81%.

Fluence Energy has a consensus price target of $26.77, signalling upside risk potential of 51.58%. On the other hand Energy Vault Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $4.54 which suggests that it could fall by -13.97%. Given that Fluence Energy has higher upside potential than Energy Vault Holdings, analysts believe Fluence Energy is more attractive than Energy Vault Holdings.

Fluence Energy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Energy Vault Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Fluence Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Energy Vault Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fluence Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Energy Vault Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fluence Energy quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Energy Vault Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.2M. Fluence Energy's net income of $47.8M is higher than Energy Vault Holdings's net income of -$26.6M. Notably, Fluence Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 131.53x while Energy Vault Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fluence Energy is 0.92x versus 2.79x for Energy Vault Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ormat Technologies has a net margin of 3.9% compared to Fluence Energy's net margin of 10.43%. Fluence Energy's return on equity of 4.1% beat Ormat Technologies's return on equity of 4.79%.

Fluence Energy has a consensus price target of $26.77, signalling upside risk potential of 51.58%. On the other hand Ormat Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 21.75%. Given that Fluence Energy has higher upside potential than Ormat Technologies, analysts believe Fluence Energy is more attractive than Ormat Technologies.

Fluence Energy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ormat Technologies has a beta of 0.571, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.89%.

Fluence Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ormat Technologies offers a yield of 0.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Fluence Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ormat Technologies pays out 22.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Ormat Technologies's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fluence Energy quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Ormat Technologies quarterly revenues of $211.8M. Fluence Energy's net income of $47.8M is higher than Ormat Technologies's net income of $22.1M. Notably, Fluence Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 131.53x while Ormat Technologies's PE ratio is 35.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fluence Energy is 0.92x versus 4.76x for Ormat Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Stem has a net margin of 3.9% compared to Fluence Energy's net margin of -506.3%. Fluence Energy's return on equity of 4.1% beat Stem's return on equity of -595.48%.

Fluence Energy has a consensus price target of $26.77, signalling upside risk potential of 51.58%. On the other hand Stem has an analysts' consensus of $1.87 which suggests that it could grow by 65.93%. Given that Stem has higher upside potential than Fluence Energy, analysts believe Stem is more attractive than Fluence Energy.

Fluence Energy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Stem has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Fluence Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Stem offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fluence Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Stem pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fluence Energy quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Stem quarterly revenues of $29.3M. Fluence Energy's net income of $47.8M is higher than Stem's net income of -$148.3M. Notably, Fluence Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 131.53x while Stem's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fluence Energy is 0.92x versus 0.70x for Stem. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.