Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Buy
68
FEBO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$1.41
Seasonality move
:
-61.94%
Day range:
$1.38 - $1.42
52-week range:
$0.61 - $2.31
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
0.91x
P/B ratio:
1.42x
Volume:
26.5K
Avg. volume:
103.7K
1-year change:
-4.76%
Market cap:
$15.5M
Revenue:
$17M
EPS (TTM):
-$0.04
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FEBO
Fenbo Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CLPS
CLPS, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GLE
Global Engine Group Holding
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MGRT
Mega Fortune
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MTC
MMTec, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FEBO
Fenbo Holdings Ltd.
|
$1.40 | -- | $15.5M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.91x |
|
CLPS
CLPS, Inc.
|
$0.87 | -- | $25.9M | -- | $0.13 | 0% | 0.15x |
|
GLE
Global Engine Group Holding
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
MGRT
Mega Fortune
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
MTC
MMTec, Inc.
|
$3.19 | -- | $80.3M | 1.42x | $0.00 | 0% | 66.55x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FEBO
Fenbo Holdings Ltd.
|
15.64% | -0.679 | 0.9% | 1.83x |
|
CLPS
CLPS, Inc.
|
31.53% | 0.081 | 80.52% | 1.65x |
|
GLE
Global Engine Group Holding
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
MGRT
Mega Fortune
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
MTC
MMTec, Inc.
|
-- | -1.735 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FEBO
Fenbo Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -5.77% | -7.01% | -- | -- |
|
CLPS
CLPS, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -1.43% | -1.92% | -- | -- |
|
GLE
Global Engine Group Holding
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MGRT
Mega Fortune
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MTC
MMTec, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Fenbo Holdings Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns FEBO or CLPS?
CLPS, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Fenbo Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. Fenbo Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -7.01% beat CLPS, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.92%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FEBOFenbo Holdings Ltd.-- -- $9M CLPSCLPS, Inc.-- -- $90.6M -
What do Analysts Say About FEBO or CLPS?
Fenbo Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CLPS, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fenbo Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than CLPS, Inc., analysts believe Fenbo Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than CLPS, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FEBOFenbo Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 CLPSCLPS, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is FEBO or CLPS More Risky?
Fenbo Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CLPS, Inc. has a beta of 0.561, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.922%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FEBO or CLPS?
Fenbo Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CLPS, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Fenbo Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CLPS, Inc. pays out -109.64% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FEBO or CLPS?
Fenbo Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CLPS, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Fenbo Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than CLPS, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Fenbo Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CLPS, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fenbo Holdings Ltd. is 0.91x versus 0.15x for CLPS, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FEBOFenbo Holdings Ltd.0.91x -- -- -- CLPSCLPS, Inc.0.15x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FEBO or GLE?
Global Engine Group Holding has a net margin of -- compared to Fenbo Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. Fenbo Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -7.01% beat Global Engine Group Holding's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FEBOFenbo Holdings Ltd.-- -- $9M GLEGlobal Engine Group Holding-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FEBO or GLE?
Fenbo Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global Engine Group Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fenbo Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Global Engine Group Holding, analysts believe Fenbo Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Global Engine Group Holding.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FEBOFenbo Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 GLEGlobal Engine Group Holding0 0 0 -
Is FEBO or GLE More Risky?
Fenbo Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global Engine Group Holding has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FEBO or GLE?
Fenbo Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Global Engine Group Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fenbo Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global Engine Group Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FEBO or GLE?
Fenbo Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global Engine Group Holding quarterly revenues of --. Fenbo Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Global Engine Group Holding's net income of --. Notably, Fenbo Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global Engine Group Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fenbo Holdings Ltd. is 0.91x versus -- for Global Engine Group Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FEBOFenbo Holdings Ltd.0.91x -- -- -- GLEGlobal Engine Group Holding-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FEBO or MGRT?
Mega Fortune has a net margin of -- compared to Fenbo Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. Fenbo Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -7.01% beat Mega Fortune's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FEBOFenbo Holdings Ltd.-- -- $9M MGRTMega Fortune-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FEBO or MGRT?
Fenbo Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mega Fortune has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fenbo Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Mega Fortune, analysts believe Fenbo Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Mega Fortune.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FEBOFenbo Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 MGRTMega Fortune0 0 0 -
Is FEBO or MGRT More Risky?
Fenbo Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mega Fortune has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FEBO or MGRT?
Fenbo Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mega Fortune offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fenbo Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mega Fortune pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FEBO or MGRT?
Fenbo Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Mega Fortune quarterly revenues of --. Fenbo Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Mega Fortune's net income of --. Notably, Fenbo Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mega Fortune's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fenbo Holdings Ltd. is 0.91x versus -- for Mega Fortune. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FEBOFenbo Holdings Ltd.0.91x -- -- -- MGRTMega Fortune-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FEBO or MTC?
MMTec, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Fenbo Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. Fenbo Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -7.01% beat MMTec, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FEBOFenbo Holdings Ltd.-- -- $9M MTCMMTec, Inc.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FEBO or MTC?
Fenbo Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MMTec, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fenbo Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than MMTec, Inc., analysts believe Fenbo Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than MMTec, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FEBOFenbo Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 MTCMMTec, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is FEBO or MTC More Risky?
Fenbo Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MMTec, Inc. has a beta of -0.768, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 176.765%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FEBO or MTC?
Fenbo Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MMTec, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fenbo Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MMTec, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FEBO or MTC?
Fenbo Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than MMTec, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Fenbo Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than MMTec, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Fenbo Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MMTec, Inc.'s PE ratio is 1.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fenbo Holdings Ltd. is 0.91x versus 66.55x for MMTec, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FEBOFenbo Holdings Ltd.0.91x -- -- -- MTCMMTec, Inc.66.55x 1.42x -- --
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
72
GLTO alert for Dec 27
Galecto, Inc. [GLTO] is up 16.92% over the past day.
Sell
20
SMX alert for Dec 27
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 15.76% over the past day.
Sell
11
CDNAF alert for Dec 27
Canadian Tire Corp. Ltd. [CDNAF] is down 10% over the past day.
