FDIF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Fidelity Disruptors ETF's net margin of --. Fidelity Disruptors ETF's return on equity of -- beat ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF's return on equity of --.

Fidelity Disruptors ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fidelity Disruptors ETF has higher upside potential than ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF, analysts believe Fidelity Disruptors ETF is more attractive than ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF.

Fidelity Disruptors ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Fidelity Disruptors ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.34%. ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF offers a yield of 1.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. Fidelity Disruptors ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fidelity Disruptors ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF quarterly revenues of --. Fidelity Disruptors ETF's net income of -- is lower than ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF's net income of --. Notably, Fidelity Disruptors ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fidelity Disruptors ETF is -- versus -- for ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Fidelity Disruptors ETF's net margin of --. Fidelity Disruptors ETF's return on equity of -- beat AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF's return on equity of --.

Fidelity Disruptors ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fidelity Disruptors ETF has higher upside potential than AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF, analysts believe Fidelity Disruptors ETF is more attractive than AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF.

Fidelity Disruptors ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Fidelity Disruptors ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.34%. AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF offers a yield of 1.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share. Fidelity Disruptors ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fidelity Disruptors ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF quarterly revenues of --. Fidelity Disruptors ETF's net income of -- is lower than AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF's net income of --. Notably, Fidelity Disruptors ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fidelity Disruptors ETF is -- versus -- for AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

First Trust Multi-Manager Large Growth ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Fidelity Disruptors ETF's net margin of --. Fidelity Disruptors ETF's return on equity of -- beat First Trust Multi-Manager Large Growth ETF's return on equity of --.

Fidelity Disruptors ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand First Trust Multi-Manager Large Growth ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fidelity Disruptors ETF has higher upside potential than First Trust Multi-Manager Large Growth ETF, analysts believe Fidelity Disruptors ETF is more attractive than First Trust Multi-Manager Large Growth ETF.

Fidelity Disruptors ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Trust Multi-Manager Large Growth ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Fidelity Disruptors ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.34%. First Trust Multi-Manager Large Growth ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fidelity Disruptors ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Trust Multi-Manager Large Growth ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fidelity Disruptors ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than First Trust Multi-Manager Large Growth ETF quarterly revenues of --. Fidelity Disruptors ETF's net income of -- is lower than First Trust Multi-Manager Large Growth ETF's net income of --. Notably, Fidelity Disruptors ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while First Trust Multi-Manager Large Growth ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fidelity Disruptors ETF is -- versus -- for First Trust Multi-Manager Large Growth ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SoFi Social 50 ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Fidelity Disruptors ETF's net margin of --. Fidelity Disruptors ETF's return on equity of -- beat SoFi Social 50 ETF's return on equity of --.

Fidelity Disruptors ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SoFi Social 50 ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fidelity Disruptors ETF has higher upside potential than SoFi Social 50 ETF, analysts believe Fidelity Disruptors ETF is more attractive than SoFi Social 50 ETF.

Fidelity Disruptors ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SoFi Social 50 ETF has a beta of 1.533, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.299%.

Fidelity Disruptors ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.34%. SoFi Social 50 ETF offers a yield of 0.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Fidelity Disruptors ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SoFi Social 50 ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fidelity Disruptors ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SoFi Social 50 ETF quarterly revenues of --. Fidelity Disruptors ETF's net income of -- is lower than SoFi Social 50 ETF's net income of --. Notably, Fidelity Disruptors ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SoFi Social 50 ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fidelity Disruptors ETF is -- versus -- for SoFi Social 50 ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.