FAMI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Big Tree Cloud Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Farmmi's net margin of --. Farmmi's return on equity of 0.98% beat Big Tree Cloud Holdings's return on equity of --.

Farmmi has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Big Tree Cloud Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Farmmi has higher upside potential than Big Tree Cloud Holdings, analysts believe Farmmi is more attractive than Big Tree Cloud Holdings.

Farmmi has a beta of 1.228, which suggesting that the stock is 22.802% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Big Tree Cloud Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Farmmi has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Big Tree Cloud Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Farmmi pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Big Tree Cloud Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Farmmi quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Big Tree Cloud Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Farmmi's net income of -- is lower than Big Tree Cloud Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Farmmi's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.69x while Big Tree Cloud Holdings's PE ratio is 289.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Farmmi is 0.03x versus 25.33x for Big Tree Cloud Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oriental Rise Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Farmmi's net margin of --. Farmmi's return on equity of 0.98% beat Oriental Rise Holdings's return on equity of --.

Farmmi has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Oriental Rise Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Farmmi has higher upside potential than Oriental Rise Holdings, analysts believe Farmmi is more attractive than Oriental Rise Holdings.

Farmmi has a beta of 1.228, which suggesting that the stock is 22.802% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oriental Rise Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Farmmi has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Oriental Rise Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Farmmi pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oriental Rise Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Farmmi quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Oriental Rise Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Farmmi's net income of -- is lower than Oriental Rise Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Farmmi's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.69x while Oriental Rise Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Farmmi is 0.03x versus -- for Oriental Rise Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Shineco has a net margin of -- compared to Farmmi's net margin of -93.04%. Farmmi's return on equity of 0.98% beat Shineco's return on equity of -65.35%.

Farmmi has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Shineco has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Farmmi has higher upside potential than Shineco, analysts believe Farmmi is more attractive than Shineco.

Farmmi has a beta of 1.228, which suggesting that the stock is 22.802% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Shineco has a beta of -0.071, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 107.146%.

Farmmi has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Shineco offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Farmmi pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Shineco pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Farmmi quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Shineco quarterly revenues of $2.2M. Farmmi's net income of -- is lower than Shineco's net income of -$2M. Notably, Farmmi's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.69x while Shineco's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Farmmi is 0.03x versus 0.03x for Shineco. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tantech Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Farmmi's net margin of --. Farmmi's return on equity of 0.98% beat Tantech Holdings's return on equity of --.

Farmmi has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tantech Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Farmmi has higher upside potential than Tantech Holdings, analysts believe Farmmi is more attractive than Tantech Holdings.

Farmmi has a beta of 1.228, which suggesting that the stock is 22.802% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tantech Holdings has a beta of 0.420, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.019%.

Farmmi has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tantech Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Farmmi pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tantech Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Farmmi quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Tantech Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Farmmi's net income of -- is lower than Tantech Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Farmmi's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.69x while Tantech Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Farmmi is 0.03x versus -- for Tantech Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.