EXEL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Alnylam Pharmaceuticals has a net margin of 21.87% compared to Exelixis's net margin of -22.27%. Exelixis's return on equity of 20.97% beat Alnylam Pharmaceuticals's return on equity of --.

Exelixis has a consensus price target of $33.06, signalling downside risk potential of -0.68%. On the other hand Alnylam Pharmaceuticals has an analysts' consensus of $299.11 which suggests that it could grow by 21.84%. Given that Alnylam Pharmaceuticals has higher upside potential than Exelixis, analysts believe Alnylam Pharmaceuticals is more attractive than Exelixis.

Exelixis has a beta of 0.518, which suggesting that the stock is 48.162% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Alnylam Pharmaceuticals has a beta of 0.319, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.077%.

Exelixis has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Alnylam Pharmaceuticals offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Exelixis pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alnylam Pharmaceuticals pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Exelixis quarterly revenues are $539.5M, which are larger than Alnylam Pharmaceuticals quarterly revenues of $500.9M. Exelixis's net income of $118M is higher than Alnylam Pharmaceuticals's net income of -$111.6M. Notably, Exelixis's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.34x while Alnylam Pharmaceuticals's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Exelixis is 4.81x versus 14.86x for Alnylam Pharmaceuticals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Merck & has a net margin of 21.87% compared to Exelixis's net margin of 18.95%. Exelixis's return on equity of 20.97% beat Merck &'s return on equity of 29.26%.

Exelixis has a consensus price target of $33.06, signalling downside risk potential of -0.68%. On the other hand Merck & has an analysts' consensus of $128.73 which suggests that it could grow by 31.29%. Given that Merck & has higher upside potential than Exelixis, analysts believe Merck & is more attractive than Exelixis.

Exelixis has a beta of 0.518, which suggesting that the stock is 48.162% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Merck & has a beta of 0.393, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.746%.

Exelixis has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Merck & offers a yield of 3.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.81 per share. Exelixis pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Merck & pays out 2039.73% of its earnings as a dividend.

Exelixis quarterly revenues are $539.5M, which are smaller than Merck & quarterly revenues of $16.7B. Exelixis's net income of $118M is lower than Merck &'s net income of $3.2B. Notably, Exelixis's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.34x while Merck &'s PE ratio is 20.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Exelixis is 4.81x versus 3.95x for Merck &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pfizer has a net margin of 21.87% compared to Exelixis's net margin of 25.23%. Exelixis's return on equity of 20.97% beat Pfizer's return on equity of 4.63%.

Exelixis has a consensus price target of $33.06, signalling downside risk potential of -0.68%. On the other hand Pfizer has an analysts' consensus of $31.86 which suggests that it could grow by 20.88%. Given that Pfizer has higher upside potential than Exelixis, analysts believe Pfizer is more attractive than Exelixis.

Exelixis has a beta of 0.518, which suggesting that the stock is 48.162% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pfizer has a beta of 0.653, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.739%.

Exelixis has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Pfizer offers a yield of 6.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Exelixis pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pfizer pays out 436.39% of its earnings as a dividend.

Exelixis quarterly revenues are $539.5M, which are smaller than Pfizer quarterly revenues of $17.7B. Exelixis's net income of $118M is lower than Pfizer's net income of $4.5B. Notably, Exelixis's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.34x while Pfizer's PE ratio is 35.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Exelixis is 4.81x versus 2.52x for Pfizer. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sarepta Therapeutics has a net margin of 21.87% compared to Exelixis's net margin of 7.2%. Exelixis's return on equity of 20.97% beat Sarepta Therapeutics's return on equity of 12.48%.

Exelixis has a consensus price target of $33.06, signalling downside risk potential of -0.68%. On the other hand Sarepta Therapeutics has an analysts' consensus of $185.10 which suggests that it could grow by 55.59%. Given that Sarepta Therapeutics has higher upside potential than Exelixis, analysts believe Sarepta Therapeutics is more attractive than Exelixis.

Exelixis has a beta of 0.518, which suggesting that the stock is 48.162% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sarepta Therapeutics has a beta of 0.767, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.328%.

Exelixis has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sarepta Therapeutics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Exelixis pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sarepta Therapeutics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Exelixis quarterly revenues are $539.5M, which are larger than Sarepta Therapeutics quarterly revenues of $467.2M. Exelixis's net income of $118M is higher than Sarepta Therapeutics's net income of $33.6M. Notably, Exelixis's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.34x while Sarepta Therapeutics's PE ratio is 77.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Exelixis is 4.81x versus 7.30x for Sarepta Therapeutics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.