CPTN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Genasys has a net margin of -1945.52% compared to Cepton's net margin of -168.91%. Cepton's return on equity of -- beat Genasys's return on equity of -102.17%.

Cepton has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -1.25%. On the other hand Genasys has an analysts' consensus of $4.25 which suggests that it could grow by 109.97%. Given that Genasys has higher upside potential than Cepton, analysts believe Genasys is more attractive than Cepton.

Cepton has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Genasys has a beta of 0.514, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.599%.

Cepton has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Genasys offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cepton pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Genasys pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cepton quarterly revenues are $547K, which are smaller than Genasys quarterly revenues of $6.7M. Cepton's net income of -$10.6M is higher than Genasys's net income of -$11.4M. Notably, Cepton's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Genasys's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cepton is 2.86x versus 4.69x for Genasys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MIND Technology has a net margin of -1945.52% compared to Cepton's net margin of 10.67%. Cepton's return on equity of -- beat MIND Technology's return on equity of 19.13%.

Cepton has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -1.25%. On the other hand MIND Technology has an analysts' consensus of $8.00 which suggests that it could grow by 5.26%. Given that MIND Technology has higher upside potential than Cepton, analysts believe MIND Technology is more attractive than Cepton.

Cepton has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MIND Technology has a beta of 1.178, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.754%.

Cepton has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MIND Technology offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cepton pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MIND Technology pays out 345.26% of its earnings as a dividend.

Cepton quarterly revenues are $547K, which are smaller than MIND Technology quarterly revenues of $12.1M. Cepton's net income of -$10.6M is lower than MIND Technology's net income of $1.3M. Notably, Cepton's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MIND Technology's PE ratio is 2.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cepton is 2.86x versus 0.41x for MIND Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sobr Safe has a net margin of -1945.52% compared to Cepton's net margin of -3991.43%. Cepton's return on equity of -- beat Sobr Safe's return on equity of -351.33%.

Cepton has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -1.25%. On the other hand Sobr Safe has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 48597.97%. Given that Sobr Safe has higher upside potential than Cepton, analysts believe Sobr Safe is more attractive than Cepton.

Cepton has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sobr Safe has a beta of 0.675, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.479%.

Cepton has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sobr Safe offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cepton pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sobr Safe pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cepton quarterly revenues are $547K, which are larger than Sobr Safe quarterly revenues of $46.1K. Cepton's net income of -$10.6M is lower than Sobr Safe's net income of -$1.8M. Notably, Cepton's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sobr Safe's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cepton is 2.86x versus 1.12x for Sobr Safe. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Teledyne Technologies has a net margin of -1945.52% compared to Cepton's net margin of 18.15%. Cepton's return on equity of -- beat Teledyne Technologies's return on equity of 10.21%.

Cepton has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -1.25%. On the other hand Teledyne Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $502.91 which suggests that it could grow by 15.13%. Given that Teledyne Technologies has higher upside potential than Cepton, analysts believe Teledyne Technologies is more attractive than Cepton.

Cepton has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Teledyne Technologies has a beta of 1.009, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.87299999999999%.

Cepton has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Teledyne Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cepton pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Teledyne Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cepton quarterly revenues are $547K, which are smaller than Teledyne Technologies quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Cepton's net income of -$10.6M is lower than Teledyne Technologies's net income of $262M. Notably, Cepton's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Teledyne Technologies's PE ratio is 23.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cepton is 2.86x versus 3.99x for Teledyne Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.